Investing in Kenya’s People: Valuing the Benefits of the
U.S.-Kenya RelationshipChapter 4 (Part 2 of 3)
Finding 14: U.S. governance sector-focused assistance helps Kenya create
the right incentives for its elected officials to improve how
they deliver services and respond to citizen concerns.
Kenya’s Vision 2030 calls for the country to “move to the future
as one nation” and overcome a legacy of political division and
preferential access to services along ethnic or religious lines
(Masakhalia, 2011; Wanjobi, 2014). Under President Uhuru Kenyatta,
Kenya has committed to ensuring greater representation of diverse
voices (e.g., political ideologies, ethnic groups) in
decision-making, strengthening civil society, improving
transparency, and facilitating constructive political dialogue,
among other initiatives.
The United States and Kenya share a common interest in promoting
good governance and strengthening democratic institutions that are
inclusive of all Kenyans. Over the past two decades, the U.S.
government has conducted 37 technical assistance programs and
channeled over USD 257 million into activities to support and
improve Kenya’s governance practices (see
Figure 15). Between 2014 and 2018, the United States directed
approximately USD 19.6 million annually to activities related to
democracy, human rights, and governance.
Figure 15. U.S. government-directed democracy, governance, and human
rights assistance to Kenya, 2001-2018
↩
Notes: This graph depicts U.S. official development assistance
disbursements to Kenya that are earmarked for democracy,
governance, and human rights between 2001 and 2018 in constant
2019 USD.
Source: USAID Foreign Aid Explorer Data.
Governance interventions, by nature, take many years to bear
fruit, but Kenya has already made important strides forward. The
country has created space for a growing diversity of political
voices. Historically a one-party state (1982-1991), Kenyans formed
17 new political parties between 2000 and 2009, and more than 14
parties have been registered from 2010 to the present. Meanwhile,
citizens have had greater opportunities to exercise their voices
at the ballot box, as there has been a steady increase in the
level of free and fair elections over the past decade, according
to the Bertelsmann Transformation Index for Kenya (BTI, 2018).
Competitive elections and diverse political representation create
powerful incentives for elected officials to improve access to
services and respond to voter concerns (Sen, A. 1999; Mehrotra, S.
2008). Therefore, we would expect to see higher levels of access
to services and citizen satisfaction with the government in line
with Kenya’s growing political diversity and practice of free and
fair elections.
In this respect, it is encouraging to see Kenyan households
reporting increased access to clean water (a 15 percent increase)
and electricity (a 40 percent increase) between 2000 and 2017,
according to the World Bank (WDI, n.d.). Kenyans’ optimism about
their government’s ability to reliably deliver these essential
services and overall confidence in their government officials are
also on the rise. Recent waves of the Afrobarometer survey suggest
that almost 70 percent of Kenyan citizens perceive the
government’s response to public demand for electricity positively
in 2018, up from only around 45 percent in 2008. Similarly, yearly
rounds of citizen surveys conducted by Gallup World Poll indicate
that the share of citizens who have confidence in Kenya’s national
government has also gone up, from 25 percent in 2009 to nearly 70
percent in 2019.
Kenya still has a long journey ahead to deliver on its Vision 2030
commitments. Nonetheless, the country has come far in terms of
creating political space through a growing diversity of political
parties and the practice of free and fair elections. This
political progress also appears to correspond with improving
access to critical services and growing confidence of citizens in
their government to respond to their needs. There are many factors
that likely contribute to Kenya’s success in realizing its good
governance commitments, but it is fair to say that the United
States has been an important partner in this effort in supplying
critical financial and technical support.
Finding 15: U.S. agriculture sector-focused assistance helps boost Kenya’s
rural productivity in order to increase incomes and reduce
inequality.
As Kenya positions itself to become a rapidly industrializing
middle-income nation by 2030, modernizing its agriculture sector
to increase crop yields will be essential to not only ensure the
country’s food security, but also improve rural livelihoods. The
United States has been a major financial and technical assistance
partner to Kenya’s agricultural sector, through both its bilateral
and multilateral assistance programs (see
Figure 16), as well as through microloans, grants, and technical
assistance from U.S.-based organizations and individuals.
Figure 16. U.S. agricultural aid and productivity of Kenya’s
agricultural sector, 2008-2018
↩
Notes: This graph visualizes the total productivity of Kenya’s
agricultural sector between 2008 and 2018 in constant 2019 USD.
Source: World Development Indicators, the World Bank.
Nearly three-quarters of Kenya’s population rely on agriculture
for either all or part of their income (USAID Kenya, n.d.).
Agriculture is also a large revenue generator for Kenya’s economy:
it generated 34 percent of the country’s GDP in 2018, up from 22
percent in 2008.
[29]
Notably, this does not reflect a shrinking economy, by any means,
as Kenya’s overall GDP experienced a steady growth rate of 5.15
percent on average during this same period.
[30]
Meanwhile, incomes per capita have steadily risen from roughly USD
1,050 in 2008 to about USD 1,400 in 2018
[31]
and income inequality has declined since the 1990s (Table 4). Although many factors could contribute to rising incomes and
declining inequality, the fact that the vast majority of Kenya’s
population relies on the agricultural sector for their livelihoods
makes it likely that at least some of these gains are due to
increases in agricultural productivity and associated revenues.
U.S. assistance has helped Kenya boost its agricultural
productivity in several important ways. One emphasis of U.S.
assistance has been on introducing improved agricultural
techniques, such that farmers are able to generate higher crop
yields and minimize disruptions due to climate-related shocks.
This creates a dual benefit for Kenya in both strengthening food
security through more stable supplies of staple crops—a priority
following the 2011-2012 East African drought—as well as helping
farmers minimize the risk from a potential loss of income. A
second emphasis of U.S. assistance has been in increasing access
to global export markets for smallholder farmers. Trade agreements
like AGOA have provided a helpful enabling environment for Kenyan
farmers to boost their incomes.
Table 4: Kenya’s GINI coefficient as a measure of income
inequality
↩
Year
GINI
1992
57.5
1994
43.1
1997
45.0
2005
46.5
2015
40.8
Notes: The Gini coefficient is a summary measure of the degree
of inequality in the distribution of family income in a country.
This table reports Kenya’s Gini coefficient from 1992 to 2015.
Higher coefficients are associated with higher levels of income
inequality, while lower coefficients indicate lower levels of
inequality.
Source: World Development Indicators, The World Bank.