STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE CLOSEOUT REPORT Date: f une 28,2002 SO NAME & NUMBER: "Increased Incomes of the Poor" 527-002 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION OF SO (NATIONWIDE OR SPECIFIC REGION): Nationwide, with emphasis in the extremely poor population living in the highlands and the poor living in rural and peri-urban areas. CHANGES IN RESULTS FRAMEWORK DURING THE LIFE OF SO: Added in 1998: IR 2.5.1 Increased access to financial services by microentrepreneurs and small farmers Dropped in 1998 : IR 2.4 Strengthened OrganizationaI Outreach SO-LEVEL IMPACT (IEXF'ECTED VS. ACTUAL): Overall the SO capacity to increase incomes of the poor were hindered by the impacts of the El NSo in 1998, the global financial crisis in 1999, and the political instability of 2000 and 2001, which seriously hampered the country's economic growth. The GDP growth rate dropped from 7.2% in 1997 to less than 1% in '1998 and stayed that low for the following years. In spite the economic recession of the last four years, in the regions in which USAID'S poverty reduction efforts are focused, interventions were directly responsible for increasing incomes and employment of USAID's customers. 5. IR-LEVEL IMPACT (EXPECTED VS. ACTUAL): 1R 1: Improved Policy environment for broad based growth USAID's major contributions to improve GOP's policies can k summarized in the WP's adoption of the economic corridors approach to reduce poverty, which was an outgrowth of the USAID'S Food Security Strategy; current GOP's efforts to consolidate its nutrition programs; and GOP's efforts to improve targeting of its social programs, as well as establishing clear performance indicators to improve their efficiency. The outgrowth of the 1995 Food Security Strategy generated new tactics and approaches to reduce poverty. It proposed to focus investments and services in secondary and tertiary (intermediate) cities where income and employment opportunities exist for the poor and where effective fonvard and backward linkags with agriculture and rural enterprises can be effectively developed and strengthened. This approach, which later developed into an "economic conidors" strategy, is currently used by the GOP as a central element to reduce poverty in the medium tern USAD support for the development of a Proposal for a National Strategy for Reducing Chronic Malnutrition was based on a series of studies, workshops and analysis of best practices, with the participation of stakeholders (GOP, donors. NGOs, academic institutions) working in the area of fd assistance and nutrition. The strategy paper generated consensus among decision-rnakers on the need to establish dear priorities and focus interventions, evaluate and consolidate current programs and replicate proven effective approaches. Poverty Forums - During 1998-2001, in a collaborative effort, twenty bilateral and multilateral donors brought together key institutional players in a series of workshops that are attempting to capitalize on the kt experiences to date in interventions leading to poverty reduction, with a view to influencing the strategies developed by the COP, NGOs and other development organizations. This efforts have led the GOP to refine Peru's poverty map and develop criteria to prioritize public social investment; and to reactivate an interministerial commission to better coordinate activities in health, nutrition, education, welfare and justice. In addition, it has created consensus on the need to establish clear and measurable objectives, as well as performance monitoring systems to improve efficiency of social investments. Other interventions were directed to improve the poIicy environment to promote private sector investment. For example, under the Policy Analysis, Planning and Implementation (PAPI) project, implemented with the public and private sectors, efforts had a direct impact on the GOP's reduction of selected taxes, thereby making Peruvian export industries more price competitive in international markets; influenced the GOP decision to provide concessions of road and potable water construction and maintenance to private entities; provided public sector training in the operation of commodities exchanges which has facilitated the formal establishment of the Lima Commodities Exchange at the beginning of 1998; strengthened the Consumer Protection and Intellectual Property Rights Agency (INDECOPI) on improved oversight and enforcement of Peruvian competitive processes; and facilitated mining that resulted in the simplification of &e property titling process which directIy improved the operations of the GOP titling institution. More recently, a USAID study established that there would be $200 million in lost "oppormniry costs" associated with the poor conditions of the Carretera Marginal over the next seven years. USAID'S Economic Service Center in the region, the local association of municipal leaders and private investors have established a commission to analyze options for a public-private sector partnership to finance the improvement of this critical road. l[R 2: Increased Market Access for Microentrepreneurs and Small Farmers USAID activities through the private sector exporters association (ADEX) helped rnicroenmprenem and small farmers enter new Iocal and foreign markets, and strengthened its market share. During the strategic period, coastal agricuItural products such as garlic, onions, lime, and grapes were successfully introduced in Colombia, Ecuador, Venezuela and the U.S, while mangoes and beans increased their market share in tbe US and European markets. Today, coastal crops that "graduated" from the program, such as se9tlyellow onions, export $15 million per year, providing jobs to 2,600 people. Starting 1998, emphasis shifted to expand market linkages with producers of highiand and jungIe crops. As such, the products featured were Andean grains (quinoa), potatoes, prickly pear (and cochineal), as well as coffee and cacao, which gained markets in the US and Europe, as well as Lima high-income markets. In addition, alpaca products (meat, skin, and sweaters) entered new markets in Li and Europe. S&ng in 2000, as a result of PRA efforts, Spain is a new market for French beans. Also, pineapple produced in Huancayo is now being provided to a processor who had been sourcing his material from Ecuador, and corn producers in Huanuco are now meeting the extensive needs of local chicken farmers. Assistance to microentrepreneurs in clothing, shoes and handicrafts also proved to be huge successes. In shoes, the most notable was the introduction of Peruvian shoe production to Austria. The MSP's assisted handicrafts program now works almost exclusively for the U.S. home accents market (e-g. Pottery Barn, Crate & Barrel and Pier 1). Likewise, pottery from Chulucanas and Ayacucho has gained market share in U.S. and European markets. Partner export companies begun joint investment agreements with artisans to meet the quality standards and production volumes that the market demands. As a result of USAII) market access activities, over 11,000 small farmers and microentrepreneurs increased their sales' for domestic and foreign markets from $1.7 million in 1995 to f 12.2 in 1997. Starting 1998, the program graduated coastal crops and the Alternative Development program started financing selva products. I Used as a proxy measurement for producer income 2 Nevertheless, the SO2 program assisted an avenge of 3.500 clients per year - microentrepreneurs and producers from noncoca growing areas -, who, despite the El Niiio and financial and political crisis, increased their sales by $8.8 million in 1998 to $34 million in 2001. Furthermore, during 1997-200I.28.300 new jobs were created. Women accounted almost half of them, in agricultural and non-agricultural enterprises, especially in handicrafts and clothes. IR 3: Improved Capacity of the Extremely Poor The Title It program - implemented by six cooperating sponsors (ADRA. CARE, CMAS. CRS, PRISMA, andTechnoServe) -- has kn responsible to improve the capacity of extremely poor population in the rural Sierra and Selva areas, where levels of poverty and extreme poverty are the highesr in Peru. During the 1997-2001 period, the program started a phase-out strategy that led to narrow its focus, in terms of target population, geographic areas and approaches, which has increased its efficiency. Based on its improved monitoring, assessing and learning, the program moved progressively from a poverty alleviation approach, based on food distribution and nutrition rehabilitation, to a poverty reduction approach, based on income generating activities and an integrated attack on chronic malnutrition. Elements such as health, sanitation and education played an important role, focusing on children under five. Overall, P.L. 480 Title 11 programs addressed the food security needs of approximateIy 1,800,000 people in over 5,800 communities. The program contributed to the reduction of chronic malnutrition by at least 15% in targeted communities with interventions focusing on the short-term needs of mahourished children and their families, and the medium-term needs of increasing household revenues to enable faklies to acquire basic needs reIated to poverty reduction. Interventions reached a yearly average of 290,000 malnourished children under the age of five years and their mothen, designed to achieve a sustainable and healthy growth trend, including completion of vaccinations, education and training events for mothers, and monitoring of weight gains. In addition, an average of 130,000 ruraI families per year received food-for-work rations while re￾constructing roads, building latrines, potable water systems, and health posts, rehabilitating irrigation systems, and undertaking terracing of agriculmd land. They benefited not only from the shon-tem nutritional value of the ration, but also have laid the foundation for sustainable, longer-term gains in f&y incomes and improved health through improved living conditions and increased skills. Complementary to these inhstructure investments, the program has also helped an average of over 124,000 farmers per year increase the productivity and quality of selected crops to meet market opportunities and improve their family income. IR 4: Strengthened Organizational Outreach Activities in this area, implemented through the US PVO PACT, strengthened management and implementation capacities of 85 NGOs and 2 NGO networks who work in departments with high incidence of extreme poor populations. This has helped these NGOs to widen their possibilities to access other funding sources (GOP and other donors) and increase their outreach to a greater number of niral and extremely poor communities. Training and technical assistance to NGOs included subjects as personnel management, strategic planning, project design using the logical framework, monitoring and evaluation, and financial managernenthdgeting. PACT also provided training in participato~y planning; collaborating cIosely with municipal authorities in identifying priority needs and proposed solutions. IR 5: Increased Production and Productivity of microenterprises and small farms Increases in production and productivity have been confirmed in the increases in sales of these products. Increases in productivity surpassed expectations in the manufacturing area, where there was a reduction in unit production costs of near 40%, due to MSP's assistance to improve processing and management skills. The success of this assistance has resulted in the establishment of Centers of Technology Innovation in the area of apparel. Similar successes were achieved with highland products. which have increased their yields two to three￾fold over the strategic period. The quality of coffee for export was also improved by the adoption of water efficient de-pulping technologies. IR 5.1 Increased access to financial services by microentrepreneurs and small farms SO2 has had a resounding impact on the microfinance sector that exceeded expectations. The number of microentrepreneurs and small farmers that have had access to financial services increased from 6,900 in 1996 to 75,335 in 2001. USAIDdirectly supported micro-finance institutions increased their 1m portfolios from $14 rniIlion in 1997 to $25 million in 2001. During the 1997-2001 period, women accounted for 60 to 85% of the portfolio; 40% of the microcredits were directed to rural areas; and almost 70% of loans were for anti-poverty lending - less than $300. The average delinquency rate for USAID￾sponsored credit services was 5%, below nationwide rates. In addition to direct credit services, SO2 also expanded its assistance to microfinance institutions that provide credit to S02's target beneficiaries through the NGO COPEME (Consortium of Organizations that Support SmaIl and Micro Enterprises). COPEME developed a set of common services that has allowed for improved economies of scale for NGOs and formal microenterprise financial institutions. COPEME also conducted training and technical assistance activities to introduce best practices among such institutions, which has strengthened their intermediation capacity and dropped operating costs. COPEME is now directly providing services to 19 Microfinance institutions, including NGOs and EDPYMES (Development Entities for Small and Micro Enterprises) with a combined loan portfolio of over $44 million and near 90,000 clients, representing 65% of the total microfinance portfolio of NGOs nationwide. COPEME also provided other services geared to strengthen the Ms. The credit bureau service, in alliance with INFOCOW, is successfully servicing 39 h@I. A self-regulation program for credit NGOs started performing operational audits on 17 MFIs and is currently providing useful information for the programming of new training courses on accounting and banking principles, and management information systems. The SINFONED, MFIs monitoring system, has published 3 quarterly reports on the performance of the Peruvian MFIs, thereby establishing comparative benchmarks that will increase the efficiency of all participating MRS. A major contribution of USAID microfinance activities was the recognition in the sector of the importance of sustainability of the operations in order to provide services to the poor. Another important breakthrough was the establishment of two guarantee programs with MIBArVCO and Solucidn Financiers de Crkdito. The Mission and the Office of Development Credit used the Development Credit Authority that will increase the commercial supply of funds to approximately 20,000 microentrepreneurs by $12 million over the next two years. This marks an important rniIestone for Peru, as it is the first time commercial banks have created loan portfolios specifically for microentrepreneurs. 6. LESSONS LEARNED IN IMPlLEMENTATION OF THE SO: There are many lessons that can be drawn from implementing as broad and far-reaching an SO as this one. Increasing incomes of the poor is a monumental challenge worldwide, and a particularly daunting one in a country in which over half the population is classified as poor, and where fully 15% of the country does not have sufficient resources to purchase food. One lesson that we fee1 is important to note is the need to differentiate between poveny reduction and poverty alleviation. In the Mission's terms, poverty reduction encompasses all those activities geared to generating sustainable economic growth and, with it. increased opportunities for the poor to earn a livelihood and gradually lift themselves out of poverty. Poverty alIeviation refers to actions and programs that address the critical needs of the most poor and isolated of society, and for whom basic subsistence is an ongoing problem. The goals in this instance are to ensure that their most basic nutritional and health requirements are addressed, to prevent further deterioration and, most importantly, to assure that permanent and irreversible damage to small children and infants is avoided. In the area of poverty reduction, it is vitally important that all efforts to enhance the prductivity and earning potential of the target beneficiaries be market driven. By this, SO2 means that all actions be taken to help its clients generate products for which there is an unmet demand. It makes little or no sense to engage in efforts to increase the production of, for example, potatoes in a given area because the conditions are appropriate for them, or because they are a traditional crop, when the market is, or will be, saturated with them at harvest time. It is far better for all concerned to first seek out buyers for particular products or crops, and then work with one's clients to ensure that production can satisfy the demands of these buyers. If these efforts are successful, the prospects for repeated and ongoing commercial relations are developed and enhanced. Such efforts can be classified as "demand pull" rather than "production push". The phrase that was developed to summarize this approach is "produce what you know you can sell, rather than try to sell what you've already produced. The beneficiaries of these efforts are admittedly, by and large, the more "economically viable" of the poor- those who have the wherewithal to provide goods and services that meet market requirements for quantity, quality and timeliness. The rationale for this is that this approach offers a means to assist a great number of poor to increase their incomes in what is expected to be a sustainable manner and insert them more soundly into a modern market economy. We nevertheless recognize that there are an extraordinarily high number of poor whose circumstances are direr, and who need more support and attention. In these case, we seek to alleviate their suffering by providing feeding supplements and nutritional counseling to those who are at the most risk. This means children under three years of age and their lactating mothers. The reasons for this are that our limited resources can be put to best effort by reducing the incidence of chronic malnutrition with this target population. If a child is chronically malnourished, its physical, mental and psychosocial development is thwarted, and no amount of subsequent feeding or nutritional support can overcome or reverse the damage done. In a country as poor as Peru, one can find evidence of chronic malnutrition wherever one looks. However, the highest incidence occurs in the rural sierra. SO2 has accordingly learned that the ,oreatest cost-effectiveness for our Iirnited assistance dollar comes fiom targeting efforts in those geographic areas where extreme poverty and chronic malnutrition are the highest. Well-conceived and well-implemented programs in these areas have the greatest impact in ensuring that future generations won't be as handicapped as their forbearers in seeking to escape poverty. Other lessons learned can be summarized as follows: Effectiveness of assistance can be increased with a geographical focus, clear objectives and precise indicators. Understanding of the difference between poverty reduction and poverty alleviation, has led to establishing different strategies, targeting population. objectives and timeframe for each stage- which has allowed to set up attainabfe targets at reasonable costs, and thus increase assistance efficacy. USAID capacities to influence policies were overestimated. Change in policies is very difficult for a sole institution. A unified donors' position is more effective. Interventions in policy dialogue cannot be charged to a contractor. The organization to work with in the area of policy dialogue has to have influence. decision-making power and political will to act. In addition, its members' decisions need to fotlow the organization's mandate. Donor assistance should be used not only as a financing instrument, but also primarily as a way to introduce innovative approaches that have been tested and validated in a replicable scale in previous experiences, which eventually could influence policies. Lessons learned from studies and USALD experience need to be disseminated effectively to inform strategy development. USAD, based on its successful experiences - in country and worldwide, should play a more active role in defining the conceptual framework of partners' development proposals. Greater knowledge of your "customer/client" is very efficient to develop adequate strategies. A degree of certainty on resources availability is needed to establish redistic targets. A change in USAD policies within an ongoing strategy affects implementation costs and resources use that should be taken into account when considering any modification of a strategy. Although the Title IT program is implemented by different Cooperating Sponsors, it has to be managed as an integrated program, in terms of focus -geographic and population \vise- and performance measurements, that responds to the needs of the host counny and the Mission strategy. The magnitude of Title II resources, in the case of Peru, is such that can be used as an effective mechanism to promote effective strategies and influence GOP and other parmers. Recipients need to be more accountable for the results they are delivering. However, grants that are USAID/W based usually reduce the monitoring role that Missions can exercise and diminish its capacity to resolve problems and improve efficiency and effectiveness of assistance. The strategy to identify markets and then identify speciaiized producers to adapt products to met proven demand is effective to assist small producers increase their incomes. The scale of agricultural production units is a constraint to expand a sellable supply. Small agricultural units do not have enough assets to support impredictable cases. Technology cannot be introduced in small units, or in areas where there are no technical support services. NGOs need to act as facilitators of market linkages, but not assume the cornrnercialization per se. There are other costs and knowledge that an NGO does not have. Besides, it is not sustainable in the long run. Efforts to improve the regulatory framework are needed. For example, land titling in valleys with productive capacity to foster the land market to consolidate productive units. A more efficient use of natural resources requires efforts to increase awareness on the economic value of natural resources (e-g. water, forest, land) and the environmental services associated to them, in addition to the economic benefits of the direct or indirect use of them. Mission should define one and only rnicrocredit policy, according to ADS 219. Interest ntes should take into account promoting the operational sustainabiiity of the MFI. USAIDfferu experience in microcredit has demonstrated that subsidized rnicrocredit that does not provide for the sustainability of the funds, in the long run causes the loss of the funds, and eventually affects the people we want to serve. The expansion of an NGO microfinance program needs to be gradual and not significantly at once because it will endanger the achievements in operationaI sustainabihty already made. The evaluation of the PVO Support project stressed the need to expand community participation in the participatory pIanning effort, provide more intensive training on indirect cats and operating efficiency of NGOs, train fewer NGOs more completely, work more intensively- with NGO consortia, and include gender training. A 2000 CDIE review of USAID'S Poverty Reduction Experience cited: "Another program notable for its use of an explicit poverty reduction goal is USAlDPeru. It's Slrategic Objective for economic growth is "t increase Incomes of the poor."l3 The Mission's "second cities" project identified over thirty economic comdors, combining economic potential with poverty incidence (Plunkett 8 Salinger 1999 p. 31). The second cities program is concentrated geographically in poor districts which are physically and economically linked to growing markets and intermediate cities (FY 2000 CP). According to the USAID'S 1997 Annual Progress Report, the Peru Mission also conducted innovative food security programming, combining maternal and child health, school and community feeding and income generation programs which were tightly focused on communities not benefiting from the country's economic revival @p. 140-11." 7. LIST OF EVALUATIONS/SPECIAL STUDIES: - Instituto Cuanto, Evaluacion de Impacto Nutricional de Comedores Populares en Poblaciones en Riesgo, June 1997 - Village Bank Evaluation in Peru, 1997 - Management Systems International. Peru PACT PVO Evaluation, 1997 - Evaluation of Title II microcredit programs, 1998 - Loui Berger, Evaluation of Title II Programs - 1999 IMPACT Evaluation of FINCA Microcredit program - Apoyo Consuitoria, Estartegia de Desarrollo SociaI. Enero 1999. - Instituto Apoyo, Evaluacion de Programas y Proyectos Productivos financiados con Recursos de PL480 Titulo a. Noviembre 1999 - Abt Associates, PAP1 Evaluation, May 1997 - Prisma, Panfar Evaluation ,2000 - Adra Peru, hfome Final. Evaluacion de Impacto 1997-1999, Febrero 2000 - Instituto Apoyo, Politica Nacional para la Reduccion de la Desnutricion Cronica en el Peru, Julio 2001 - Tufts School. of Nutrition Science and Policy. Proposal for a National Strategy to Reduce Chronic Malnutrition in Peru. October 2001 - Universidad del Pacifico. "Elementos para el DesarrolIo de Ias Ciudades Intermedias en Apoyo a la Lucha contra la Pobreza Extrerna - I Diilogo sobre Experiencias y Retos en la Lucba contra !a Pobreza, 1998 - I1 Dijllogo sobre Experiencias y Retos en la Lucha contra la Pobreza, Salud, Nutrition, Saneamieto, Justicia, 1999 - I11 Dijllogo sobre Experiencias y Retos en la. Lucha contra la Pobreza, Generation de Empleo, 2000 8. ESTIMATED OTHER DONORfPARTNEWCOUNTERPART CONTRIBUTXONS: During the FY 1997-FY 200 1 period, the GOP budgeted US5.5 billion in anti-poverty pro,mrns. Other donors financed several programs that complemented USAID poverty reduction strategy. Specific co￾funding examples include: European Union, for the GOP Executive Secretariat for Anti-Poverty Programs; the Swiss on a study on market potential for Andean grains; IICA on cost-sharing for technical assistance and training for the Lima Commodities Exchange; the World Bank, IDB, UNDP, and other bilateral and multilateral organizations on the implementation of the Poverty Forums. Pro,pms (grants and loans) from other donors (World Bank, IDB, Canada and Japan) in the area of economic growth and poverty reduction amounted $2,227 milIion. These programs were focused mainly on economic infrastructure, such as roads, energy, irrigations; structural economic reform, food security, credit, agriculture, and modernization of the public sector in areas such as tax, customs, trade and investment. 9. PEOPLE DIRECTLY INVOLVED WITH THE SO: DATES WORKING ON SO 8/986/02 8/92-8198 4101- to date 8/97-6101 8194-5/97 NAME Mike Kaiser Harry Wing Mike BurkIy Stan StaHa Robert Wilson Jaime Giesecke Alfredo Gutienrez Samuel Chincaro Pedro Cardlo Victor Merino I I 1 b 10. LIFE OF SO FUNDING: (In US $) TITLE Team Leader Team Leader Food for Peace Officer Food for Peace Officer Food for Peace Ofiker Jorge Alarcon t USAID TOTAL 1 George Baldino 1 Fernanado Chavez Eduardo Albareda Connie Gutierrez Juan Robles PRA ~cikit~ Manager Microfinance Specialist Title II Coordinator Title II Coordinator Title I1 Coordinator PVO Suppod f GRAND TOTAL $281,612,000 1 9197- to date 6199- to date 7/86 to date 6100- 3/02 7198-312000 10197-2/00 Title I1 Coordinator PAP1 Activity Manager Food Security Advisor M&E Coordinator MSP Activity Manager MSP Activity Coordinator PVO Support/ Title la coordinator 5195-10198 3187- to date 6/00- to date 11192- to date 919 1-9/98 9/91-8197 Note: This SO is carrying forward a pipeline of $6,592,655 of Development Assistance funds to support the continuation of some activities under the new Strategic Objective No. 10, Increased Economic Opportunities for the Poor in Selected Economic Corridors 11. SUMMARY LIST OF ACTIVITIES UNDER THE SO: Activity TitIelShort Description 527-0343 Policy Analysis, Planning and Implementation (PA PI) Assisted the GOP and the private sector in developing sound economic policies and strengthening the policy dialogue and decision-making process. 527-0353 PVO Support Project Strengthened the institutional capacity of Peruvians NGOs to work more effectively with community organizations in the delivery of health, agricuIture and enterprise development services. 940-0406 Microenterprise Innovation Project (MIP)* Expanded outreach of USAIDPeru microenterprise programs through expanded NGO financial services outreach, and the provision of non-financial services for microenterprises development. 527-0349 Microenterprise and Small Producers Support - - Project (MSP) Increases incomes and employment of microentrepreneurs, small producers and smallholder farmers and strengthen their member grassroots organizations through technical assistance and access to credit, entrepreneurial and managerial skills, production services, and strengthening the capabilities of ADEX, and NGOs to provide sustained technicaI assistance and market access services to microenterprises. 527-0387 Povertv Reduction and Alleviation Activitv ", (PM) Expands opportu;lities for sustained productive employment and income growth for the poor and the exbernely poor through the operation of Economic Service Centers (ESCs) and policy studies. The ESCs primarily facilitate information on markets, technical and management assistance, and access to financia1 services, in order to lower the costs of entry into markets and broaden the participation of local people in them; and act as an aggressive broker of deals between Iocal producers and foreign, domescic buyers and investors. Policy studies are directed to address constraints that restrict economic opportunities and competitiveness at the local and regional level identified by the Economic Service Centers; and constraints at the macro level identified by the GOP. the private sector and USAIDmeru. P.L.480 Title II Food Security Program Ensured the food security of populati& groups living in extreme poverty by satisfying essential food needs. stimulating production and income growth through labor-intensive productive activities among small farmers and microentrepreneurs, and improving the FY 1997- 2001 Funding Amount (US$) 2,309.393 4,963,337 3,637,000"* 19,7 16.198 8,078,633 242,908,060 health status of nutritionally at-risk families. * EG Bureau funds supported MSP related components: Credit Access Program, I Start and End Date 9120190 12n 9/97 7f23/92 9/30/00 91 1 19.5 9l30102 101~191- 9/30/M 10/1/99- 9/30/03 lO/l196- 1213 1/01 ti-Poverty Irnptementing Organizations Secretaria General de la Presidencia de la Republica DEG CONFIEP PACT AJlEX, COPEME CRS, CARE. FXNCA caritas Minka, Pirka, El Taller ADEX-Artesanias ADEX Louis Berger tnt'l Chemonics Technoserve CRS CARE FNCA COPEME COmIEP Chernonics CARE Caritas rnRA PRISM4 Technoserve CRS snding Microenterprise ~evel&rnent Services. ** Includes PD&S funds ANNEXES: All Results Frameworks (necessary) Completed FY 97-01 PMP indicator table (necessary) Other documentation important to the SO SO Team Clearances: Team Leader: Program Office Backstop: SO? - Results Frn~aework 3/29/Y6 Marketing Organization/ ------------------- Transportalion I I I I I ! Analysis INCREASED INCOMES OF INCREASED MARKET ACCESS INCREASED PRODUCTION/ PRODUCTIVITY I Legislalion Technology Capitalization ;r. I A IMPROVED POLICIES STRENGTHENED m ORGANIZATIONAL OUTREACH CAPACITY OF EXTREMELIY POOR I ---*-..-....---------- Productiv~ 1 NulrMonal 1 I Edctl 1 lnfrastructuro Rehabllltatlon I ! Management Systems I Selvlce Delivery RESULTS TRACKMG TABLES Strategic Objective Two: hlcrcwed Inconies of the Poor PERFORMANCE INDICATOR STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 1. Value of Expenditures per capita of the Poor. (Data analyzed by socio￾tconomic and geographic variables.) R4 Reported 2. Value of Expe~Kliturcs per capita ofrhc extrmncly Poor. (Data analyzcd by swio￾economic and gcograptiic variables.) -- "- . - - 3. Perccntayc of Poor in dic Populaio~r. Definition: The wr are defined as household whosc aer I ' lNDICATOR DEFINlTION AND DATA SOURCE UNIT OF MEASWIGMENT capita expenditurk is lower that the cast of the basic/minimurn consumption basket, which is the basic food nutritional basket plus the cost of other necessary goods and services. At current prices (lWG), a person is defined as poor if histher average daily expenditure does not exceed $1.75. Assumptions: (a) U.S. $2.2 for 1994 ad devaluation effects incorporated every year thereafter; (b) 1.7% annual population growth rate; and (c) average of six n~cmbers pc~ housclroldlycar. U~rll: U.S. 1894 dollars/capitalyear Dcfiition: The rxtremcly poor are defined as household INCREASED INCOMES OF THE POOR BASELINE DATA YEAR I VALUE whose per capita rxpenditk is lower that the cost of the biak food nutritional basket. At current prices (1996), a purson is clefincd as extremely Vr if hislller average (daily cxpcnditurc docs rm1 exceed $1.00. Assumptions: (:I) U.S. $2.2 for 1'994 and devaluation cffccts incorpratcrl every year thcreafter; (b) 1.7% annual population growth ratc; and (c) average of scven members per houscholdlycar. TARGETS I ACTUAL lW 1 1998 1 1!W 1 U)o 2031 Unit: U.S. 1994 dollarslcapidyear - .- - -- Dcfinlllon: 'Shc mr are defined as housclrold whosc wr capita cqn~wlitur;! is lowr hilt the cast of the bxiiclmii~imum consumption baskel, which is [he basic fwd rntritio~ul basket plus tlrc cost of other iucrssary goods and services. At current prices (lWG), a person is defined as por if hislhcr nvcrlgc daily cxpcnditure does lrot cxcccd $1.75. U@t: Ieynt _-. =.= LIC~IIW Thc cxnemcty Ijoor;i SU~SC~ ur III~wor ppuletion, arc defined as household whuc per ciipitrr cxlxnditurc is Iowcr tlun the cost of drc haslc fvod nutririo~ul baskcr ihat covcrs minimutn nulrilio~ul rct~uirctncn~s. The N(rtionn1 Living Slnndflrds S~rvey , xnducted by CUANTO. SA. The N(itiotrd Living St~u~dflrrk S~irvey , ~onducted by CUANTO, SA. nrr NorionnI Living Stn11r1ord.s Srirvey , co~lductcd by CUANTO, SA. T71e Noliotrfd Livlrrg Sirrtrrl~rr(b Sirrvey , co~wluctcd by CUAM'O, SA. 1994 Lima Rural Sierra Rural Selva Lima Female￾headed household MI (1) 1994 Lima Rural Sicrta Rural Sclva lNE1 (1) 1996 Lima Resf Urhn Rural Rural Sicrra Rural Sclvn lNLl (I) 1996 Lilil;~ Rcst Urban Rarirl Rural Sierra R~~ritl SCIVCI Ira1 (1) 5a** NIA 334 NIA ~~PERFo~NcB 1 INDICATOR DEANITION AND I DATA SOURCE I BASELINE DATA I TARGETS I ACTUAL ** Targcrs nay be adjusted down ward later in 1998 based on impact of El Niho, and final survei results. INEI (1) National ~ousehold Survey-IV quaner, used as a proxy for 1937-2000, revised in 2002. The 2001 data IS baed on a revised methodology. INDICATOR *ovcd Policy Environnient for Broad-hied Growth . Per Capita Social :xpnditure for the Poor COMMENTS: Socio-economic variabtes include: Sex, ducation, age. Geographic variables: urban, rural, Lima, coast, Sierra, Jungle. * Preliminar UNlT OF MEASUREMENT W Reported I YEAR I VALUE I IW I 8 I 1W I Uxxr 1 UKll Definition: Total social exnenditures of the central 1 Exnenditure 129 (original base W~S 158- budget , updated to expenditures) 69 government (which include's some transfers to regional governments), expressed in per capita terms. USAID uses the GOP dcfinilion of social expenditures, which includes three broad categories of expenditures: 1) basic; 2) focused or urgent; and 3) other. The entire budgets of the Ministries of Education and Health, the Basic Justice program, as well as a large number of more targeted programs opcraled by other COP ministries are included in d~e social cxpcnditure calculation (see allached notes for detailcd explanation). Expclwlitures are expressed in current U.S. dollars. Total population of the country is us~vl to dcrivc the per capita figure. Unit: Current U.S. dollars Definition: Social exptdia~res for he pr arc dcfined as all ccntnt government cxpmditures (which inctudes somc rra~afers to region71 governments) for GOP programs classified by the COP as 'urgent". There are currenlly 14 such progrms. An csdmak of the pmr population of the country is used to derive the per capita figure. The poor arc: defined as households whose percapita expenditure is lower than thc cost of the ~iclrninirnum consun~ption basket, which is the bask food nulritiorul baskel plus the cast of othcr necessary gds ad scrviccs. At current priccs (IflG), a person is defi~led as poor if l~isll~er avcrikge daily cxpnditurc docs not cxcccd $1.75. Uult: 1Y!6 U.S dollm Corirtnails: 'Ihrgcts ~uy tX: ndju~lcd downwnrd Iiitcr in 1998 bwcd on Impxt of 01 Nlho, a~wl B&?I survct results dais: The Ministry of Economy and Finance; data are drawn from two publica~ions: Peru in Nunrbers (Peru en Mlmeros) and Annun1 Public Sector Budget (Presrrpuesto del Sector Publico). Population data: National Iwtitute of Statistics (INEI) Expenditure data: Tf~e Ministry of Economy and Finance; daca are drawn from two publica~ions: Pem in Nun16ers (Pcnr et~ Nwneros) and Afvrrml P1f6lic Sector 01ldger (Prcsupuesfu &I Sector A~6llco). Population dm: Cuanro S. A. Living Stundurd Survey PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITION AND UW OF MEASUREMENT DATA SOURCE NIA BASELINE DATA. TARGETS I ACTUAL INDICATOR VALUE 114.4 4.8 20.3 45.G YEAR 1995 (D) Lima Rural Sierra Rural Selva rnI I. Selccr policy, legal or .sgulatory ruforms Definitiou: [NOTE: sprcific policies to be identified by he SO2 extended team bued on additional analysis.] 1 Oualitative information ske PAP1 repru Unit: Dcflnition: A household is defined as having unsatisfied basic needs if it demonstrates at least two or more of the following characteristics: - no sewage, drainage or toilet system; - more than three people per bedroom; - tcmpraty construction materials, i.e, dirt floors, straw mat walls, etc.: - head of family with incomplete primary school and more thian thrcc dcpmdents per income earna; - childre11 bctwecn the ages of 6 and 12 that do not attend school t. Prrccnt of households with two or more unsatisfied mic needs. National Household Survey, INEI ,Data analyzed by socio- :conomic and geographic tariables) PVO surveys undertaken by the coopcrating spomor (ADRA, CARE, PRISMA and CANTAS) National and Tide 11 activiry 1ased.1 Unil: Pcrccntage N: Nationiil PL: Title I1 cxoendihlrrs Tor d~c or include: 1. Min.of Economy and Finance fi lass of Milk" Program; 2. FONCODES (developmcnt social fund); 3. PRONAA ( food assistance) ; 4. COOPOP (community works); 5. INFES (Mucation & I.Ieallh Infrutructurc); 6. PAR (Displi~ccul Pcrsons Program; 7. Ministry of Agricullurc: (3 Supprt to Emergency Arcas, and (b) Pronamacla (soil comervation); 8. Ministry of the Prcsidency: Water and Scwagc Program; ). Ministry of Mucation: Schotar food and Education (breakfasts) : 10. Ministry ofTransp. & Communicatiom: Rural Roads program: 11. Ministry of Encrgy & Mining: Social Bl~micity Development Program; 12. Presidency of the Ministers' Council: Civic Action; 13. Ministry of HcalU~: Family Planning and Emergency Fund to figla epidemic diseases; 14. Min, of Economics & Fi~nce: Sacial Support Program/PL 480. 2) Iudic~lor droppcd. ljot.w~th!nUSAlD's seablc interest Irrtunrrtdiule Reid1 2.2: Incrc i. Value of exnora of 1 ;electid non-tr:dihi~l :xporr products. Slcctcd - Products Dry hala Garlic Y.Onions Y. Potatoes Key li~tw Grqm Coc1rine:tt Col'fcc flarrllcmRs Sllws Mangoes (a) products Lhar were not rxpdrted by Peru prior to lW, Customs or (b) prtxlucts that havc not ken expned on a regular Administnlion Agric~~llarnl products: itw dry km vikrictics; garlic; ycllow onlans; ycllow pomms: kcy lime; gritps, cochineal .coffee, Miercrntcrprisc prcxlucls: hi~~wllcr;ifts; shots basis during the last 5 years, Tlu FOB viiluc of exports of cwh sclcctcd prolluct is aggregatnl to prcxluce this indicator. Scle~tcd products rcprcsent goods produccd nuinly by small farmers and microcntcrpriscs. Tllc value of cxpuris for cach product is tracked scpanlcly, ;r~d is oygrcyltcd into otle annual figure. Unlt: 'l'hot~si~nds of currcnt W.S. datlt~rs I (SUNAD) A~uuiil Reports PERFORMANCE INDICATOR . Number of new export 7arkcts for selected clients. Activity based] ;. Annual valuc of sales of cleclcd products. Activity based] I. 1::rrln-gm or producer wicc as ;I pcrcc~~t;cgc of cnd )riccs. lNDICATOR DEFINITION AND UNlT OF MEASUREMENT Definition: A new market has been established when a client group establishes itself as a regular source of supply for an export market which it did not previously supply, A regular source of supply is defined as a minimum of one transaction annually for two consecutive years. Selected products to dare: dry beans, mangoes, key line. sweet yellow onions, garlic, Andean grains, yellow potalms, coffee, cacao, alpaca fiber, meat and skins, handicr;~fts (ceramics, rugs, painted wood products, knitwear), wearing apparel and shoes. hit: Numbcr of new markets in the given year. Delinition: Aggregate value of increased sales of USAID's cust&cri working with selected products. Sulected producu; to date: dry beans, mangoes, key lime. sweet yellow onions, garlic, Andean grains, yellow pomtocs, coffee, cacao, alpaca fiber, meat and skins, handicrafts , wearing apparel and shoes. U11il: Current US. dollars. . -. Defiultion: Numkr of ruii-he cquivalcnt jobs gcncratcd by irlcrcascd salcs of USAID-assistcd clicnls. lncludcs scasorul employment. In agrlculturc, 194 ~k~~01lldiIy~ wagcs is equivalent to one full-time crnploymcnf. . -. .- - - 1)eflnlilor: ~rrn-~tc/~tod~~;r~~ce is dclincd its the pricc paid to small famcrs or microentrcprcncurs for thcir products. Birch pricc is defincd ;is either the cxlwrl pricc (FOB), or tb dornestic wholesnla pricc. Sclcctcd prwlucts: coffcc, cacao, dry beans, wtatms. IATA SOURCE , BASELINE DATA YEAR 1995 Garlic Dry beans Mangoes Key lime Y .onions And.grains Y .potatoes Coffee Cacao Alpaca fiber, meat and skins, Handicrafvj Apparel Sl1oes. rtule fc~nalc No dis, Ministry of Agriculture Monthly Bullctin Cnlfcc Potuoes Appirrcl VALUE 15 1,731 2,419 30 1998 I0 12 15,164 8,757 .G,222 4,799 2,552 2,247 ." 45 NIA 1w 10 8 18,442 8,803 7,323 3,505 50 NIA m1 10 NI A 22.300 3.1,m 11,000 6,800 50 Nlh PEWORMANCE INDICATOR 5. Numkr of ~iicrocntrcprcncurs and mall farmers with mproved ~narkct acccss COMMENTS/NOTES: D :2) Indicator dropped. Nor w :3) Indicator used by irnplemt [ntcrrncdiate Result 2.3: 111 1. Chronic Malnutrition Rates. [Narional and Titlc II￾miviry based] :Data analyzed by ?,cographical chmctcristics) R4 Reported roved Productive Capacity 01 the Extremely Poor Definition: Cl~ildren aged under 60 months with a height for age more than two srandard deviations below the Narional Center for Wealth Starislics (NCHS) benchmarks Unit: Percentage N: Nation.?l R: Rural PL: Title 11 ** INEI estimates . INDICATOR DEFINITION AND UNlT OF MEASUREMENT Wearing apparel. Unit: Percentage Demographic Health Survey (DHS), undertaken by [he Na! ional Statistics Institure (INEI) PVO surveys underfaken by (lie cooperaling sponsor agencies (ADU CARE, PRISMA, and CARITAS) DATA SOURCE BASELIP DATA TARGETS ACTUAL , " YEAR VALUE 1997 1998 lW UX)O 2031 1996 N: National R: Rural 1994 (Cuanto) Na~ional Sierra Rural Selva Ruril Definition: equivalent to the number of clienrs in USAID-sponsored programs. Programs are structured to identiFy markers prior to identifying clients. Therefore, by definition, a program client has improved market access. Unit: Number Siern products: I I I I Semi-annual 1996 14,013 20,000 repolls from 20,741 28,327 (3) ADEX I crease from 1997 due to carly estimates of El Nillo damages in agriculture. hin USAID's manageable interest I I I I I I COMMENTSINO'I'ES: A special Tirle I1 report will include also: Numkr of cl~ildren in Tide I1 Nurririon aid Grow~h Monitoring programs; Children with con~pletc ir~ui~uniuriom under Tirle I1 program; Percent of childrun cnrollcd in Title 11 progrim who show psitivc growll~ trends; Average weight gains; Numkr of children graduating from feeding program; Beneficiaries tlut have complc~d cycle of training cvcnrs; Nu~abr of families wirh ncccss to new sanitaryll~calth facilities; Hectares and fnrnilies served that arc incurprated under improved production technologies: under new or rclnbilitatcd irrigation sysreins; Hccrarcs incorporated under inqxavcd soil comcrvatlon or trgroforestry practiccs; Nu~nbr of ~mrkering ir~frastrucrural works: Kilon~etcrs of ;lcccss roads rchabilltiitcd; Valuu of microcredit loui portfolio; Nurnbcr of loans; Delinquency rates; Loan dcfault rates; Tcmportrry employment gcncratcd undcr Titlc I1 Faod for Work programs; Families assisted in coca prducinl: zones: Projxl sulxrvision. Sce ublcs for Title 11 Inten~~cdl;~te Resutt 2,4: lucrc;~scd Produclivlty uf Mlcrocr~tcrpriscs und Sn~i~ll FIIPIIIC~S Ministry of 1995 0% 29.5 15.0 15.0 15.0 15,O Agric~rlturc, 50 (3) Office of Stafls~lcs 1. Yields jmr hccterc of sclcctcd small hrnlcr crol)s. dcflnitios: hvc;agc pcrccnfay lncrcasc in yiclds (output) per hcctarc of selected crops. Sclcc(cd crops We grown mitinly by small farmers. Co;iswl pruducts: - dry kons - swcct yellow onions PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITION AND DATA SOURCE! BASELINE DATA I TARGETS I ACTUAL INDICATOR UNIT OF MEASUmMENT YEAR 1995 VALUE 0 based on the 2000 8 NIA 199l 1N8 20 10 18) 17 14,315 results obtained by the activity 1 - yellow polaloes - Andean grains Selva products: - coffee - cacao Unit: Averagc yearly pcrcentage of change. 2. Reduction in production Definition: ~verahe prcenuge reduction in production :os~ pr unit of output of selected microenterprise pro(lluc~s. R4 Reported I/ Annual reports from ADRA. CARE. CARlTAS and PRISMA. Semi-annual reports from ADEX costs (as a mcasurr&nt of productivity) of ' microenterprises owned by USAID customers. Selected products arc handicrafts, wearing apparel and shoes. Unll: Average yearly percentage of change * Preliminary Data Dcll~iltiorr: Number of direct clients of USAlD projects tint are using improved technologies introduced by USAID. lmprovcd tcchnologirs are those directed to improve management, markcting and produclion skills. In addition, Number of non-direct clients will be trackcd. Non-direct clients are 111osc that are not receiving direct assistance from USAID, but arc part of the target groups. Semi-annual reports from ADEX. 3. Number of clicntslcustomers using improved technologics [activity-based) the year 20( Special studies. xrcent reduction Unit: Nunrkr .- h" ~rrcts prcscmd in the R4 FY97-FY99 conridcrcd a total 7( . .I rrccivcd during tllc R4 rcview, targcts wcr~lowcred down to a total 50 perccnr reduction by llre year 2001 Microe~~trcprc~~eurs und Small F 3) Indicator used by implenrentary agencies. Not reported I( ~nnuai reports from ADU. CARE, CARlTAS and PRISMA. Sotni-aanual rqnrls from ADEX mers 1996 Male Female 1995 l~~icroc~rrrepre~lcurs and stnall hrtncrs that have acccss to credit 6,m 3,500 snlall hrmers clients that have accessed USAID and non￾USAID crcdit sources; and number of microcn~rcprcl~eurs and stirall Lrnrrs clients of USAID￾assistcd crcdit retailer NGO financial inriitu[io~u. USAlD clicnts are dcdncd us those rccciving dircct technical assistance or training. USAID.assistcd crcdit rclailcrs are those that rcccivc technical assistance to irlrprove thcir credit providing capacity. [activity-based] It4 Reported Annual rcprw from ADRA, CARE, CARI'PAS and sponxored financial programs hrvc mrrdc rrviiil:hlc to low.incume proplr. Loan Portfolio PERFOIlMANCB INDICATOR DEFINITION AND INDICATOR UNITOFMEASUREMENT , , Unit: Thousands of U.S. dollars 3. Avcrage delinquency rate Dcfinition: Delinquency rates for each credit provider of USAID-sponsored credit and average rate weighted by size of total portfolio. activities. Unit: Average yearly rate. II supported NGOs rs;dizing n reduction in adlninistrative 11 costs at cither of two Icvcls: 11 [Note: dcfincd as :I nxasure of efficiency .] 2. Nu~nkr of USAlD￾supportcd NGOs tlta~ nwt or exceed ~xpected lcvcls 01 in~provcmei~t in tirgct ing poor disvicts eased Effectiveness and Eflicicncy of Organizations Pn Dcfinition: Administrative costs are defined as all uxpcndirurcs that do not directly support NCO program or activities. This is a cumulative indicator, aggregating over time the number of NGOs that realize the specified ;idministrative costs savings each year (USAID'S program works with a "ncw" set of NGOs each year). Administrative costs are calculated as a percaa of ovmll costs (administrative and program) when an NGO enters a USAID-supponcd program. The sarnc calculation is made a1 the conclusion of the program period and compared to the initial figure, The pcrccnl change detsrmines whctl~cr an NGO is included in ciher of the two cost swings categories. (For addirional dctail, refer to attached explanatory notes.) Unlt: Nurntar of NCOs - - -- .. - Defi~dtlurl: ~xpktcd lcvcls of improved targeting towards districk clussined as "high priority poor districts" are defined as follows: NGOs that syxnd up to 332 of tot:d program resourccs in poor districts are cxpecled to i~nprove targeting by at least 50 % (for cxarnplc tnoviny from all initiill lcvel of 2591 slxndtng in l~mr districv; 10 it lcvel of 38%); NGOs that sprrld txtwccn 34% and 66% of progranl resourccs iirc cxpctcd to i~nprovc targeting by at least 25%; i~ntl NGOs tlrht slx1K1 over 66% of prograln rcsourccs arc cxpcctcd to irnprovc targeting by tnt lean 12.5%. This is a cumulaivc indicator, aggregi~ting aver timd thc nutnkr of NGOs that mcct cxpcctetl ~argctlng lcvcls (USAID'S progriw works with a "new" set of NGQs each year). DATA SOURCE BASELINE DATA -, * =." YEAR I VALUE ?RISMA. Semi-annual .eports from I I ~DEX 4nnual reporb lrom ADRA, :ARE, ZARITAS and PRISMA. Semi-annual reports from idhg Assistance Accounting records of NGOs and PVOs participating in USAID￾supported programs relevant to SO 2 PVO Support, Title I1 and MSP). Gpore of NGOs and PVOs lint panidpate in programs or implcrncnt ;~ctivl~ics supported by USAID (I'VO Support, 'l'itlt: II :ind MSP). the Poor TARGETS I ACTUAL INDICATOR resources that have ken shifted to focus on the poor that use managemcnt systems INDICATOR DEFINM'ION AND Unit: Number Definition: Value of resources that llave been shifted from programs in districts not classified as poor to programs in districts classified as "high priority poor". The indicalor is meant to capture an improved focus over a one year period. This is a cumulative indicnror. aggregating ovcr time the annual value of program resources that have ken shifted to "poor" dislricts. Unit: US current dollars Dcfiaitio~~: An organization qualifies as having management systems in place-if it meets the following criteria: (1) uses the logical framework methodology as a planning and management tool; (2) has an operational monitoring and evaluation system in place; and (3) has an effective accounting system in place (to meet this criterion an accounting system must: be auditablc; bc transparent and use standard accounting techniques; and have an internal chccking system). Unit: Number I priority p&dis;rie~s arc those 419 districts classified b] DATA SOURCE .,, . Reports of NGOs and PVOs that participate in programs or implement activities supported by USAlD (PVO Support, Title I1 and MSP). Reports of NGOs and PVOs that participate in programs or implement activities supported by USAlD (PVO Support, Title 11 and MSP), ns well as assessments conducted by USAID implementing agents (c.g. I'ACT) hc Ministry of tl~v BASELINE DATA YEAR VALUE TARGmS I ACNAL 1w (4) 85 lest priority fc 1999 NIA ,cs cxlremcly rnI NIA 4 COMMEN'TSI NOTES: I Iigl (4) Indicator droplwd due to concerla o~~~atacol~cc~ion proy+njs - ---- - .. . . Pr-PICI? 0 0 0 7 mmm n rn~om v 1.932 Nln 4801 Nln Perfornwcc Indicator I-ieclares under lmproved Soil Conservation IAgroforestry Practices 6. Hectares incorporated under improved producrion rrchnologies 7. Hectares incorporated under new or rehabilitated irrigation sysrems 8. Kilonlc~crs of access roads rehabilitated !).-~urnber of marketing infrastructure bcilitirs coruitructed 10. Nunibcr of sanitarythcaltlr infrastruc~urr works co~~~tructcd or insralled - .---- ... . L A,--- I) l.Iccrares b)hrnilies 1,200 9,631 198 Nln 662 Nln 785 37r . - p5l . . 9,631 .-a.d I) Hectares b) Fa~nilics Indicator Definition and Unit of Measurement . . more of (he following: contour planring, terracing intercropping, reforestation, infiltration ditches and river defenses. Unit: a)Number of Hectares; b) Families served -,-..-- Definition: Hecrares affected by one or more of lhe following: the use of high yielding seed varielies, prop use of fertilizer, use of fertilizer, proper weeding and appropriate spacing. Unit: a) Number of Hectares; Nln 4 Nl" ,. PVO , . CARE CARITAS ADRA TOTAL ..-.-,.,.-.. ,.." ,,*. CARE CARITAS ADRA PRISMA PNS a) Works b)Rmilies 709 70' Actual 1997 Actual 1998 ' Actual 1999 Actual 2000 b) Fanlilies sewed Definition: Hectares affected by one or more of rlie following: construction or rehabilitation of canals, reservoirs or wells. Unit: a) Nu~nhr of Hcctarcs; b) Families served Definition: Rural roads * Includcs new and relrabilira~ed Unit: a) Numbcr of Kilonietcrs; b) Rmilies served Dufirritio~r: mrkcting and infr:rstn~cturc facilities include: warelrouses or packing, processing or markc tin& ~13jls. Unit: a) Nu~~rbcr of facilities; b) Families served Dcfinllion: Sanitarylhcalth i~lfr;~struc!urc works includc: latrines. suwage system, publc water systcrns, wells and Ireallh posts. IJnk ;I) Nunitxr of works; I)) Runilies served ,552 26,4a0( 6,9301 32,4391 24,8591 52,9251 20,36 I) llectares b) Families a) llectrres 1 b) Families I a) Hectares I b) Rnulics I a) Htetmws TOTAL -. CARE CARITAS ADRA TOTAL CARE CARITAS ADRA TOTAL CARITAS ADIU\ TOTAL CARE latrines CARITAS - latrincs &public toilets tonutludty fnW