2021 June for Agency States United the of request the at .Inc ,A&ME by produced was document This Juan ,Leader Team ,Jessup Francesca by independently prepared was It .Development International Social and Gender ,Sánchez Margarita and Specialist Governance and Democracy ,Fontán Pablo .A&ME of Specialist Inclusion EVALUATION MIDTERM SALVADOR EL/USAID S’USAID OF EVALUATION PERFORMANCE IN PARTICIPATION CITIZEN PROMOTING SALVADOR EL IN POLICY PUBLIC 2021 7, September International for Agency States United the of request the at .Inc ,A&ME by produced was document This ,Fontán Pablo Juan ,Leader Team ,Jessup Francesca by independently prepared was It .Development .Specialist Inclusion Social and Gender ,Sánchez Margarita and ,Specialist Governance and Democracy MIDTERM SALVADOR EL/USAID OF EVALUATION PERFORMANCE CITIZEN PROMOTING S’USAID PUBLIC IN PARTICIPATION 1SALVADOR EL IN POLICY 2021 7, September :Date Submission -16-00002TO-519-AID-15-00024/I-OAA-AID :Number Contract 2022 31, March – 2016 1, August :Date End and Date Start Activity Valencia de Annie :)COR (Representative s’Officer Contracting Party of Chief ,Thompson Joy Randal :by Submitted Initiative Learning and ,Evaluation ,Monitoring USAID .Inc ,A&ME 210 Suite ,Highway West-East 4350 20814 MD ,Bethesda 301-652-4334 :Tel com.engl@rthompson :Email Participation Citizen and Policies Public Municipal on Course the in Participants :Photo Cover (Foundation Ungo Manuel Guillermo .Dr (Ungo Manuel Guillermo .Dr Fundación :Credit DISCLAIMER States United the of views the reflect necessarily not do publication this in expressed views’ authors The .Government States United the or Development International for Agency of Promotion “is name the Agreement Cooperation the in ,however ,Work of Statement the in title Activity the is This 1 .“Project Debate Public and Process Electoral the in Participation Citizen CONTENTS OF TABLE 1 SUMMARY EXECUTIVE 1 METHODOLOGY 1 RECOMMENDATIONS AND ,CONCLUSIONS ,FINDINGS MAIN 1 BACKGROUND 1. 1 PURPOSE AND AIMS 1.1 1 CONTEXT SALVADOR EL AND OVERVIEW 1.2 3 QUESTIONS EVALUATION 1.3 3 METHODOLOGY COLLECTION DATA 2. 3 APPROACH EVALUATION GENERAL 2.1 3 DESIGN METHODS-MIXED 2.2 4 REVIEW DOCUMENT 2.3 4 INDICATORS PERFORMANCE KEY ACTIVITY OF REVIEW 2.4 4 INTERVIEWS INFORMANT KEY 2.5 4 DISCUSSIONS GROUP FOCUS 2.6 5 SURVEYS ONLINE 2.7 5 SAMPLING INFORMANT 2.8 6 ANALYSIS INCLUSION AND GENDER 2.9 6 METHODOLOGY ANALYSIS DATA 2.10 6 LIMITATIONS METHODOLOGICAL 2.11 7 CONCLUSIONS AND FINDINGS 3. ACHIEVED RESULTS UNINTENDED AND INTENDED SIGNIFICANT MOST THE BEEN HAVE WHAT 1: EQ 3.1 ,UNDERSTANDING CULTURE POLITICAL) B ,MONITORING ELECTION) A OF TERMS IN USAID BY 7 ?EDUCATION YOUTH) D AND ,PROCESSES POLICY PUBLIC PARTICIPATORY) C 7 Monitoring Election :A1. EQ 3.1.1 8 Conclusions 9 Understanding Culture Political :B1. EQ 3.1.2 9 Conclusions 9 Processes Policy Public Participatory :C1. EQ 3.1.3 12 Conclusions 13 Education Youth :D1. EQ 3.1.4 14 cycle policy public the in participate to youth educating of Results 15 culture political electoral in youth educating of Results 16 policy public and government in youth educating of Results 17 policy public for) E&M (Evaluation and Monitoring in youth educating on Result 18 Conclusions POLICY AND REFORM ELECTORAL THE INFLUENCED ACTIVITY THE HAS EXTENT WHAT TO 2: EQ 3.2 18 ?AGENDA 18 Findings 3.2.1 20 Conclusions 3.2.2 STRATEGY OUTREACH AND COMMUNICATION S'ACTIVITY THE DID EXTENT WHAT TO 2.1: EQ 3.3 20 ?AGENDA POLICY AND REFORM ELECTORAL THE INFLUENCING TO CONTRIBUTE 20 Findings 3.3.1 21 Conclusions 3.3.2 UNDERSTAND BETTER TO CSOS OF CAPACITIES DEVELOPED USAID HAS EXTENT WHAT TO 3: EQ 3.4 21 ?PROCESSES ELECTORAL MONITOR AND CULTURE POLITICAL 21 Findings 3.4.1 21 General 23 Leaders Emergent Young 25 Conclusions 3.4.2 25 General 25 Leaders Emergent Young RECIPIENTS THE WHERE INSTITUTIONS THE OF MAKERS-DECISION AND RECIPIENTS DO HOW 4: EQ 3.5 26 ?LEADERS EMERGENT FOR PROGRAM POLICY PUBLIC AND GOVERNMENT THE VALUE WORK 26 Findings 3.5.1 26 General 27 Leaders Emergent Young 28 Conclusions 3.5.2 28 General 29 Leaders Emergent Young NEW THE APPLYING IN FACE RECIPIENTS THAT BARRIERS AND HINDRANCES THE ARE WHAT 4.1 EQ 3.6 EMERGENT FOR PROGRAM POLICY PUBLIC AND GOVERNMENT THE THROUGH GAINED KNOWLEDGE 29 ?LEADERS 29 Findings 3.6.1 29 General 30 Leaders Emergent Young 30 Conclusions 3.6.2 31 CONCLUSIONS INCLUSION AND GENDER GENERAL 4. 31 MEN AND WOMEN YOUNG FOR RESULTS 4.1 31 INCLUSION AND GENDER ON PERFORMANCE ACTIVITY OVERALL 4.2 32 PROGRAMS 2025–2020 CDCS THE FOR LEARNED LESSONS AND PRACTICES GOOD 4.3 33 RECOMMENDATIONS 5. 33 MONITORING ELECTION ON 5.1 33 UNDERSTANDING CULTURE POLITICAL ON 5.2 34 AGENDA POLICY PUBLIC AND REFORM ELECTORAL ON 5.3 34 STRATEGY OUTREACH AND COMMUNICATION ON 5.4 34 LEVEL LOCAL THE AT POLICIES PUBLIC INCLUSIVE AND PARTICIPATORY MORE PROMOTING ON 5.5 35 INCLUSION AND GENDER ON 5.6 37 ANNEXES 38 WORK OF STATEMENT 1: ANNEX 48 VERSION ENGLISH PROTOCOLS :II ANNEX 54 INTERVIEWED INFORMANTS KEY OF LIST :III ANNEX 56 BIBLIOGRAPHY :IV ANNEX 58 TEAM EVALUATION :V ANNEX 59 AGREEMENTS CONFLICTS AND DISCLOSURE-NON :VI ANNEX 71 DIFFERENCES OF STATEMENT :VII ANNEX TABLES OF LIST ii Recommendations and ,Conclusions ,Findings of Summary 1: Table 1 Overview Activity 2: Table 4 Group Focus of Type by Participants of Number 3: Table 5 Rates Response Survey Online 4: Table Persons Young by Course Diploma the in Acquired Knowledge the of Use of Examples 5: Table 26 FIGURES OF LIST Elections 2019, and 2018 the for Calendar Release Reports Observation and Monitoring 1: Figure 8 ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 10 Level Local the at Policy Public for Advocacy Citizen on Course on Response Citizen 2: Figure 11 Level Local the at Policy Public for Advocacy Citizen on Course on Response Citizen 3: Figure 12 ...........................................................Course Participation Citizen and Policy Public Municipal 4: Figure 12 ...........................................................Course Participation Citizen and Policy Public Municipal 5: Figure 14 .......... Perspective s’Citizen a from Policies National and Local Formulating of Process 6: Figure Training and Experience Field with Observers Election Surveyed of Level Satisfaction 7: Figure 22 ..........................................................................................Elections 2021 and 2019, 2018, During Received Training and Experience Field with Observers Election Surveyed of Level Satisfaction 8: Figure 22 ..........................................................................................Elections 2021 and 2019, 2018, During Received ACRONYMS Unión La de Crédito y Ahorro de Cooperativa Asociación for acronym Spanish .L.R de ACACU (Union the of Credit and Loans for Association Cooperative( for Associations (Comunal Desarrollo de Asociaciones for Acronym Spanish ADESCOS (Development Communal System Directives Automated ADS Representative s’Officer Agreement AOR Republican Nationalist (Nacionalista Republicana Alianza for acronym Spanish ARENA (Alliance Strategy Cooperation Development Country CDCS Democracia la de Promoción y Capacitación de Centro for acronym Spanish CECADE (Democracy for Center Training( Party of Chief COP 2019 Disease Coronavirus -19COVID Organization Society Civil CSO Party of Chief Deputy DCOP Office Security and Governance Democratic DGS Objective Development DO Question Evaluation EQ Team Evaluation ET Discussion Group Focus FGD Latin (Sociales Ciencias de Latinoamericana Facultad for acronym Spanish FLACSO (Sciences Social of Faculty American Nacional Liberación la Para Martí Farabundo Frente for acronym Spanish FMLN (Liberation National for Marti Farabundo( Mínima Vivienda y Desarrollo de Salvadoreña Fundación for acronym Spanish FUNDASAL (Housing Minimum and Development for Foundation Salvadoran( Guillermo .Dr (Ungo Manuel Guillermo .Dr Fundación for acronym Spanish FUNDAUNGO (Foundation Ungo Manuel National (Desarrollo el para Nacional Fundación for acronym Spanish FUNDE (Development for Foundation Enterprise (Social Acción la para Empresarial Fundación for acronym Spanish FUNDEMAS (Action Social for Foundation y Económico Desarrollo el para Salvadoreña Fundación for acronym Spanish FUSADES (Development Social and Economic for Foundation Salvadoran(Social (Foundation Savior World (Mundo del Salvador Fundación for acronym Spanish FUSALMO for Alliance Grand (Nacional Unidad la por Alianza Gran for acronym Spanish GANA (Unity National Partner Implementing IP for Initiative Social (Democracia la para Social Iniciativa for acronym Spanish ISD (Democracy Mujer la de Desarrollo el para Salvadoreño Instituto for acronym Spanish ISDEMU (Women of Development the for Institute Salvadoran( Center Rights Human and Aid Legal Jerusalem JLAC Interview Informant Key KII Intersex and ,Transgender ,Bisexual ,Gay ,Lesbian LGBTI Evaluation and Monitoring E&M Plan Learning and ,Evaluation ,Monitoring MELP Institute Democratic National NDI Organization Governmental-Non NGO National of Party (Nacional Concertación de Partido for acronym Spanish PCN (Reconciliation (Party Democratic Christian (Cristiano Demócrata Partido for acronym Spanish PDC (Elections of Plan General (Elecciones de General Plan for acronym Spanish PLAGEL Medio y Desarrollo sobre Investigación de Regional Programa for acronym Spanish PRISMA (Environment and Development on Research for Program Regional (Ambiente Office Program Regional RPO Work of Statement SOW Promoting) USAID (Development International for Agency States United activity The Activity Salvador El in Policy Public in Participation Citizen (Tribunal Electoral Supreme (Electoral Supremo Tribunal for acronym Spanish TSE José (Cañas Simeón José Centroamericana Universidad for acronym Spanish UCA (University American Central Cañas Simeón (University Bosco Don (Bosco Don Universidad for acronym Spanish UDB (University Eastern (Oriente de Universidad for acronym Spanish UNIVO Development International for Agency States United USAID ABSTRACT (USAID (Development International for Agency States United the of Evaluation Performance Midterm The inform to intended is”) activity the (“Activity 2Salvador El in Policy Public in Participation Citizen Promoting electoral in participation citizen improve to contribution s’activity the) 1 :regarding Salvador El/USAID organizations society civil how) 3 and; received training the in satisfaction’ beneficiaries) 2; processes the) 1 :determine to sought It .processes electoral monitor to capacity greater developed have) CSOs( influenced activity the which to extent the) 2; achieved results unintended and intended significant most CSOs of capacities developed activity the which to extent the) 3; agenda policy and reform electoral the the of value the) 4 and; processes electoral monitor and culture political understand better to recommendations and practices Best .Leaders Emergent for Program Policy Public and Government employed team The .phase second s’activity the for inputs useful as serve should review this from derived online an ,interviews informant key ,review document including design collection data methods-mixed a and monitoring electoral found evaluation The .discussions group focus and ,survey stakeholder ,processes electoral 2021 and 2019, 2018, the document accurately to helped have reports observation proposals reform electoral The .independence and ,reliability ,rigor their for recognized widely are and positively participants society Civil .relevance and feasibility technical of terms in strengths present the at policymaking public for advocacy citizen on courses the of effectiveness and quality the regarded for Program Policy Public and Government the of Course Certificate the of Recipients .level local institutional and personal their strengthening to contributed program the agreed Leaders Emergent the of proposals policy public eight The .tools knowledge useful and relevant them providing ,capacity consulted widely and ,extensive ,diverse a present to effort systematic a represented Agenda Presidential .election 2019 the during candidates presidential to agenda Electoral the in Participation Citizen of Promotion as FUNDAUNGO with agreement cooperation the in Named 2 .Project Debate Public and Process 1 SUMMARY EXECUTIVE recommendations and ,conclusions ,findings primary the of overview an presents Summary Executive This Development International for Agency States United the of evaluation performance midterm the of noted As .3”)activity the (“Salvador El in Policy Public in Participation Citizen Promoting Activity) USAID( Performance Midterm this of purpose the ,USAID by formulated as) SOW (Work of Statement the in citizen improve to USAID of contribution the) 1 :regarding Salvador El/USAID inform to is Evaluation training the regarding have beneficiaries that satisfaction of level the) 2; processes electoral in participation monitor to capacity greater developed have) CSOs (organizations society civil how) 3 and; received :(d-a 1:Q see (EQs￾sub six and) EQs (questions evaluation four following the answered evaluation The .4processes electoral terms in USAID by achieved results unintended and intended significant most the been have What 1. policy public participatory) c ,understanding culture political) b ,monitoring election) a of ?education 5youth) d and ,processes ?agenda policy and reform electoral the influenced activity the has extent what To 2. to contribute strategy outreach and communication s’activity the did extent what To 2.1 6?agenda policy and reform electoral the influencing culture political understand better to CSOs of capacities developed USAID has extent what To 3. ?processes electoral monitor and the value work recipients the where institutions the of makers-decision and recipients do How 4. ?Leaders Emergent for Program Policy Public and Government knowledge new the applying in face recipients that barriers and hindrances the are What 4.1 ?Leaders Emergent for Program Policy Public and Government the through gained METHODOLOGY document included that design collection data methods-mixed a employed) ET (team evaluation The .(FGDs (discussions group focus and ,survey stakeholder online an ,)KIIs (interviews informant key ,review seven from informants key with KIIs 45 conducted and activity this about documents 104 reviewed ET The .groups stakeholder key RECOMMENDATIONS AND ,CONCLUSIONS ,FINDINGS MAIN are evaluation performance the from recommendations and ,conclusions ,findings main the of summary A .below 1 Table in presented Electoral the in Participation Citizen of Promotion as FUNDAUNGO with agreement cooperation the in Named 3 .Project Debate Public and Process Citizen Promoting USAID the of Evaluation Performance Final Salvador El/USAID 2021. .)SOW (Work of Statement .USAID 4 .Salvador El ,Salvador San ,Mission USAID .Salvador El in Policy Public in Participation .old years 29 and 18 between population the by constituted is USAID by defined as Youth 5 .activities these includes document Description Project the in Agreement Cooperative The 6 2 Recommendations and ,Conclusions ,Findings of Summary 1: Table Conclusions Findings ,monitoring election) a of terms in USAID by achieved results unintended and intended significant most the been have What 1: EQ ?education youth) d and ,processes policy public participatory) c ,understanding culture political) b monitoring Election) a accurately to helped have reports observation and monitoring Electoral .processes electoral 2021 and 2019, 2018, the document and local of level high a have exercises observation electoral s’activity The of scenarios potential useful extremely be may which ,credibility international .country the in uncertainty electoral future interviewees of) men percent 93 ,women percent 100 (percent four-Ninety and monitoring electoral the in independence and ,reliability ,rigor recognized .reports observation local ,press the feed to source reliable a as serve can credibility of level a Such the for ,facing especially ,actors political and ,institutions international and political a and position minority a in opposition political a ,future foreseeable .counterweights institutional few with system electoral and percent 69 and manner timely a in published always not were reports The they that mentioned interviewees of) men percent 64 ,women percent 100( .recommendations and conclusions the of dissemination limited perceived and ,forcefulness ,volume greater in disseminated been have could results The .corrections immediate for needs and complaints out point to time real processes electoral of validation facto de giving of risk a is there ,Otherwise in frauds democratic substantial or/and deficiencies structural present may that .future the understanding culture Political) b field electoral the in study panel a of implementation the facilitated activity The a building in strides made also activity The .Salvador El in time first the for .behavior political s’people in changes measure to framework s’people in changes measure) 1 to capacity local a place in leaves activity The more or two between relationships causal for search) 2 and behavior political political more so exploited be to potential the has measurement This .variables .benefit can CSOs and actors .conclusions central highlighting or recalling in difficulty some had Respondents those of) men percent 86 ,women percent 100 (percent eight-Eighty had but studies the of usefulness and relevance the highlighted interviewed .conclusions or findings specific mentioning in difficulty some academic between” translation “or bridge a establish to necessary is It and ,authorities ,CSOs by information of consumption the and production and formats different in publications making implies This .actors political the facilitate to language and ,content ,form in audiences different to adapted among ,conclusions and findings the of positioning and ,recall ,consumption .others agreed interviewees the of) men percent 93 ,women percent 100 (percent four￾Ninety .information the of made be can use more that perceived Respondents .tapped be to yet has that potential great have studies the that processes policy public Participatory) c survey online of) men percent 95 ,women percent 92 (percent four-Ninety statement the with agreed completely or agreed) 82 of out 77 (respondents through ,leaders local as capacities their strengthened had course the that effectively communicate and identify to communicate to capacity their building surveyed of percent) 80 (Eighty .attention public merit which themes at authorities municipal ,course the of result a as ,that agreed participants toward predisposition positive and openness greater a felt levels different the of opinion favorable a held participants of percent 60 and ,agendas citizen participating 20 All .spaces audience in agendas citizen of presentation level local the at policymaking public for advocacy citizen on courses The collective a present and analyze to capacity their strengthened successfully public existing improve to recommendations generate as well as ,problem competently ,content to respect with designed-well were courses The .policies ‘participants to tailored-well and ,facilitators experienced by implemented citizen and policymaking public municipal The .needs and characteristics increased functionaries and actors municipal to provided courses participation policies public of construction participatory of notion the to receptivity .problems level-local regarding 3 Conclusions Findings problem local common a identified which documents produced municipalities .issue the address to steps initial and and activities organize to tools effective with participants provided Courses adopt to officials municipal and candidates party political persuade to strategies more proved agendas citizen the of adoption the although ,agendas citizen .challenging the in included not 1, Component to dimension up-follow a integrate to Failing learned lessons meaningful draw to ability’ participants limited ,design original advocacy and building-capacity of effectiveness range-longer the regarding .training public municipal on functionaries and actors municipal to provided courses The of notion the to receptivity increased participation citizen and policymaking .problems level-local regarding policies public of construction participatory the with ended not had it if impact increased have might 1 Component to support technical additional provided rather but ,course the of termination the analyze to proposals their of adoption the advocate to efforts CSO .agendas citizen the disseminate and socialize to strategies the of effectiveness education Youth) d those including ,leaders male and female emergent young that show Findings opportunities education the of advantage taken have ,groups vulnerable from their in practice into training the put have and activity the by provided these for demand more is there that and ,work of places and organizations .opportunities build and education provide to tools useful some developed has activity The :including ,capacity and skills training of development ,them delivering for methodologies ,contents Course across bridges build to experience practical build also that environments .issues promote jointly to alliances of creation and ,points polarized and recruit and ,settings urban and rural in youth reach to practices Successful and equality gender regarding profiles diverse with participants course select .inclusion ?agenda policy and reform electoral the influenced activity the has extent what To 2: EQ present and relevant are 2 Component under proposals reform electoral The percent 76 ,women percent 100 (percent) 81 (one-Eighty .feasibility technical the of state the within are proposals the that agreed interviewed those of) men the that agreed) men percent 86 ,women percent 100 (percent) 88 (eight￾Eighty .levels regional and national the at both ,agenda reform electoral of art .supported adequately and justified technically are proposals technical of terms in strengths present proposals reform electoral The promoting and educating to contributed have They .relevance and feasibility electoral with forward move to need the of actors political among awareness .reforms electoral and Congress of Members with discussions depth-in were There .experiences international to exposure as well as authorities .viability political of terms in is proposals reform electoral of challenge main The should parties political with dialogue of processes the ,feasibility its increase To to issues the of definition scope and ,approach ,selection during mainly occur political and dialogue in intense are that processes Reform .reformed be tend that ones the usually are ,phases initial the during starting” ,negotiation“ .day of light the see to (100) hundred One .challenges faced reforms the of feasibility political The political with dialogue in experience with representatives CSO of percent would viability political that agreed interviewed deputies the as well as parties of timing and ,approaches ,topics of selection the if favored highly been have .parties political the with depth in more discussed been had reforms the (4 Component (Agenda Presidential the of proposals policy public eight The interviewees of percent) 100 (hundred One .agenda substantive a represented ,diverse a present to effort systematic a represented effort the that agreed during candidates presidential the to agenda consulted widely and ,extensive .election 2019 the structured-well a represented agenda presidential the of proposals The of channel a opening allowed that approaches term-medium with ,exercise .candidates presidential the with dialogue 4 Conclusions Findings (90) Ninety .election presidential next the for valid remain will proposals The the and issues of selection strategic the that agreed interviewees the of percent expire to not them allow reforms proposed the of approach systemic/macro .time in quickly so The .candidates presidential the with channel dialogue a opened 4 Component the providing campaigns presidential four the of each with event an held activity .proposals eight the of three receive to opportunity and nature the with familiar more become to CSOs for need a is There electoral to according processes plan to and—teams campaign of dynamics is policy public of design the for production Academic .cycles campaign with interaction greater requires but advocacy political with compatible information and dynamics the on based designed processes and actors political .makers-decision and parties political of needs limited had and extemporaneously documents produced activity The .teams campaign the with interaction policy and reform electoral the influencing to contribute strategy outreach and communication s’activity the did extent what To 2.1: EQ ?agenda were events 20 ,)2020 September (activity the of year third the of end the At electoral Salvadoran the improve to proposals and studies present to held to related proposals policy public present to held were events 13 and system percent 50 ,events these attended people 354 ,total in (agenda presidential the and reform electoral the received actors level Top .)men percent 50 ,women ,CSOs relevant of leaders and members included These .proposals policy public as ,advocacy policy public and agenda electoral the on working organizations .authorities electoral and political top as well and recipients key reaching in successful been has strategy communication The fulfills This .events private and public different during information transmitting and strategy outreach the by established channels promotion two the of one and electoral the on proposals reform promoting for space a up opened has .agenda policy public public ,strategy dissemination and promotion media the with compliance In ,workshops ,reports of presentations ,events launch of consisted have events .discussions closed and ,events online ,conferences press press and networks social via dissemination been has there Although media traditional or digital articulated no been have there ,conferences one as strategy outreach and communication the in established as ,campaigns .activity the of promotion of forms two the of underpin to efforts in short fallen have campaigns media traditional or Digital public and reforms electoral the to related messages key of installation the and promotion active the includes advocacy policy Public .agendas policy make to order in time of periods long relatively for messages key of repetition .opinion public or/and makers-decision on impact an the on reports) E&M (evaluation and monitoring no also were There a included have reports annual and Quarterly .such as strategy communication results or up follow no but out carried events public the of record detailed .registered were evaluation ?processes electoral monitor and culture political understand better to CSOs of capacities developed USAID has extent what To 3: EQ field the in supervisors and observers 2,200 deployed and trained activity The electoral the covered which ,elections 2021 and 2019, 2018, the during by developed) Boards Receiving Vote (Votos de Receptoras Juntas for instructive instruments observation election the ,)TSE (Tribunal Electoral Supreme the through data observation election of transmission the and ,activity the by built .purpose that for designed application electronic an Ungo Manuel Guillermo .Dr (institutions academic four leaves activity The University American Central Cañas Simeón José ,]FUNDAUNGO [Foundation Sciences Social of Faculty American Latin ,]UDB [University Bosco Don ,]UCA[ undertaking of capable base citizen new a and]) Program Salvador El Flacso[ This .practices best international following ,observation electoral independent are parties opposition the where ,scenarios future potential in tool useful a is 5 Conclusions Findings field the and training the of quality the with satisfied are observers election The supervisors and observers the of percent 75 ,Furthermore .experience election an in time first the for participated having reported surveyed .(men percent 71 ,women percent 77 (exercise observation Juntas in did traditionally they than presence less have may and diminished .processes electoral the during counterweights exercise to ,Votos de Receptoras to FUNDAUNGO trained University Vanderbilt from specialist academic An .behavior political in changes measure and study methodology panel a develop panel in challenges technical main two the managed adequately activity The stop who people the of percentage (rate attrition low a keeping :studies conditioning the to attention adequate and) time over surveys the answering when interviewees of responses the in arises that bias the .,e.i ,problem .time in moments different at questions same the answering political changing of time a at relevant is studies panel conduct to ability The political a as democracy for support citizen where ,Salvador El in behavior only not ,Furthermore .years 20 last the in percent 50 by decreased has regime by dropped forces political national main two the for sympathy party has percent 81 from shrank share vote legislative combined their but ,percent 45 2021. and 2006 between percent 19 to groups vulnerable and Youth of CSOs :Inclusion and Gender on knowledge updated for conduit good a been have participants CSO Young .organizations their to related policy public on particularly ,culture political the .perform they work the into skills and knowledge new their apply to tend They and ,political ,civic the for asset an created activity the ,youth trained the In of majority the ,leaders emergent young the sponsored that CSOs academic The .groups vulnerable of representatives including ,women were whom leaders emergent—men young 652 and women young 674 provided activity to abilities and knowledge strengthened the with—policy public in interested purposefully more act to and parties political or CSOs of members active be individual as or ,government in officials elected as ,institution public a within their and ,CSOs by sponsored were youth the of proportion high A .citizens capital social Political .capacities organizational strengthened have skills new civil of sectors different from alumni course of consisting ,developed also was .issues shared on networks advocacy form who society public and Policy Public and Government the value work recipients the where institutions the of makers-decision and recipients do How 4: EQ ?Leaders Emergent for Program course the where institutions the among consensus strong was There to contributed significantly Program Diploma the that worked participants by ,s’institution their as well as ,capacity professional’ participants strengthening ,Furthermore .tools knowledge useful and relevant with participants providing s’offering course the cited who ,participants the by valued highly was it their to tailored-well was it that noting ,applicability practical and relevance .needs that areas thematic of range a in training provided Program Diploma The .institutions respective their in use practical into translated participants a in course the from derived knowledge apply to able were participants The the of utility and relevance the to testifying ,areas concrete of range wide insights useful provided ET the by conducted Survey the While .content course program ,recipients the by valued was Program Diploma the how regarding ,needed was results training for mechanism E&M a that strongly felt participants .utility range￾long its and training the of sustainability the analyze to up follow as well as in impact measure that mechanisms monitoring in-built require courses Such the ,numbers participation track that systems than rather ,building-capacity .limited is which of utility 6 Conclusions Findings important an filled it as Program Diploma the valued particularly Participants political rigorous receive to Salvador El in opportunities few are there—gap to pointed also Participants .experts and analysts experienced highly by training effective especially Program Diploma the made that features unique of range a of many ,participants the of diversity/plurality the :including ,powerful and and views political differing with persons to exposure previous little had whom by generated confrontation-non and tolerance of atmosphere an and; positions a in rare environment discussion a ,implementers/organizers course the .polarization significant of context political national and ,decade last the over Salvador El in CSOs of growth significant the Given to seek should FUNDAUNGO ,opportunities training political of paucity the possibly and ,broadly more component this of results the share and disseminate and politically similarly are that courses mounting in institutions other enlist .robust academically Leaders Youth Emergent :Inclusion and Gender knowledge the applied have they how shows themselves youth from Evidence ,(informants female (organizations their in programs promoting in gained male (organizations their of members young other to them transmitting ,projects .,e.i (work their in products different developing in or ,)informants .(.etc ,proposals their within change of agents as act to youth motivated have courses The into gained have they knowledge the putting ,workplace their or organizations .activities diverse in practice and Government the through gained knowledge new the applying in face recipients that barriers and hindrances the are What 4.1: EQ ?Leaders Emergent for Program Policy Public course of majority The .barriers few encountered leaders young Emergent their to barriers significant encountered they that report not did participants to ,making-decision of positions in including ,institutions their within placed￾well were they that felt Many .obtained knowledge new the of application included applications of range The .knowledge acquired the of use active make ;(percent 19 (organizations their of members or/and peers training to reality social current on capacity analytical s’organization their strengthening policies public for proposals preparing); percent 17 (solutions policy formulate make to strategies and ,plans action ,recommendations preparing); percent 14( by participation political improving); percent 9 (councils municipal in decisions political and social effective more developing); percent 7 (CSOs other joining train to and lobby to projects preparing); percent 4 (activities communication proposals policy public present to efforts joint making and); percent 2 (leaders .(percent 2 (process electoral the in implications their and a generated has usefulness its and training the with satisfaction’ Participants particularly ,policy public and culture political in training more for demand This .policy public formulating through problems solving to oriented when work they whether ,groups vulnerable and ,women ,men to extends demand .parties political in candidates aspiring as or CSO their in advocacy in negligible are learned have participants training what applying to hindrances The and rigidity the of factor external the ,However .organizations their within a is and addressed be to yet has systems party political the of nature closed .factor limiting the in challenges to training the of application the in barriers few faced CSOs greatest the faced parties political to linked those while ,workplace hindrance one The .knowledge new their of use making to impediments .systems party political the of nature closed and rigidity the was identified of lack ,change to resistance the regarding evidence substantial is there As transformation generational and innovation of absence and ,democracy internal such of use make can CSOs ,Salvador El in parties political traditional the within .change effect to alliances institutional effective more build to training political Leaders Youth Emergent :Inclusion and Gender about enthusiasm expressed groups focus and survey online the in Informants Youth .work their of aspects different to gained knowledge the applied having acquired of application the to barriers perceive not did leaders emergent Young .knowledge 7 Conclusions Findings in actions social the complement to response institutional of lack the noted not did but ,disappointing it finding ,gained knowledge the applied they which ,barrier potential a lines party political considered Informants .efforts their stop .themselves it experienced they said none but initiative overall the in results Inclusion Social and Gender with compliance measure to indicators establish not did designed as activity The regarding 090716_mab200 ADS and 205) ADS (System Directives Automated .activities its in analysis inclusion/gender of application the gender) MELP (Plan Learning and ,Evaluation ,Monitoring its met activity The of areas the in it surpassed and participation for indicator inclusion and equality broad a of inclusion the in as well as participation youth and equality gender .groups vulnerable and ,society of sectors diverse ,territories of selection the and agendas citizen municipal the in issues s’women key of inclusion The Empowerment Female supported politics in women on study research s’activity and disaggregation sex incorporated studies research Activity All .objectives .gaps gender on remarked participants the in equity gender had Program Diploma the Although teaching the of composition the ,)women were participants 177 of percent 55( .(women for were ,slots teaching 24 of 8 ,percent 33 (balanced less was staff targeted select and ,recruit ,reach to practices effective employed activity The .methodology survey panel effective an and groups vulnerable an in indicators inclusion and equality gender including that concluded ET The and -gender the enriching as well as perform to incentive an as acted initiative .generated knowledge and information related-inclusion social and gap gender staff teaching the addressing include improvement for Areas studies of framework research the within analysis gender incorporating the of segments different in policies public in problems of effect the highlighting population the and groups vulnerable targeted select and ,recruit ,reach to practices The collaborative in .,g.e ,applicability broader have methodology survey panel .USAID in learning Recommendations Monitoring Election On with alliances establish FUNDAUNGO that request should USAID ,results disseminate further to and observation electoral of rigor scientific maintain To .recommendations and findings presented the of impact the enhance to advocacy to dedicated institutions partner specialized Understanding Culture Political On ,hypotheses ,questions investigate to order in elaboration s’study a to prior audiences potential with interviews and workshops conduct should FUNDAUNGO to feedback them audiences potential providing ease would This .have may) journalists or representatives political .,g.e (actors that demands information and .questions their studies panel implementing continue should FUNDAUNGO ,basis ongoing an on behavior political in changes measure to capacity the increase and maintain To .post ex and ante ex event electoral each sample or horizon time year-five a over year a once .,g.e—depth greater in sampling of relevance the analyze and such courses for support continue should USAID ,opportunities training political of paucity the and decade last the over CSOs of growth significant the Given positive’ participants Given .parties political and CSOs in leadership emergent toward oriented ,Policies Public and Government in Course Certificate the as 8 Conclusions Findings courses conduct and develop to institutions other enlisting possibly and ,permanent course training this making consider should FUNDAUNGO ,responses .robust academically and politically similarly are that Agenda Policy Public and Reform Electoral On reform electoral preparing when parties political the of agenda political and calendar the consideration full into take should FUNDAUNGO and USAID of definition the during especially ,parties political the of that and reforms electoral of vision s’society civil between ground middle find better to proposals .process advocacy the of phase this in helpful be may lobbying or advocacy to dedicated institutions partner specialized with Alliances .scope reform like) IPs (partners implementing help may This .documents policy public of design the to contribute to manuals advocacy systematized employ should USAID the of analysis ,phases mapping stakeholder :as such ,steps defined clearly with ,process advocacy the of scheme structured more a design FUNDAUNGO ,plan activity and strategy influence the of definition ,channels influence of analysis ,spaces making-decision of analysis ,actors political and campaigns of needs .others among Strategy Outreach and Communication On with alliances establish FUNDAUNGO that request should USAID ,effectively more it use and produced information the of rigor scientific the maintain To and findings present effectively more to) agencies media .,g.e (media digital and traditional in campaigns communication in specialized institutions .recommendations .,g.e (guidelines editorial account into taking ,documents published the of versions different produce teams communication that ensure should FUNDAUNGO simpler using ,years and countries between situations comparing ,points illustrate to examples using ,audiences different to according findings the dividing .(.etc ,infographics ,language Level Local the at Policies Public Inclusive and Participatory More Promoting On training of quality and impact measure to mechanisms E&M rigorous require CSOs for activities based-course that ensure should FUNDAUNGO and USAID advocacy as well as design policy public both include which courses training For .actions the of sustainability the judge to means and learned lessons obtain and were policies public which to extent the explore can which activities up-follow include should FUNDAUNGO ,parties political and actors municipal with goals .not why or why reasons the and adopted the on one the as such courses in activities of phase lobbying the during dimension support advocacy robust a in build should FUNDAUNGO and USAID which organizations with partner actively CSOs ensure ,toolkit the of part not is support advocacy If .groups society civil for agendas citizen of elaboration .skill important crucially this on focus or developed have Inclusion and Gender On :USAID To adequate ensure that indicators made-custom designing by activities future in requirements formal inclusion and equality gender Strengthen expertise criteria a as include personnel technical for Reference of Terms that requiring and populations target for desired results the of measuring .content material teaching developing for and ,research for ,training in positions for particularly ,analysis inclusion and gender of application the in their for initiatives USAID other in IPs to and ,initiatives future of planners to activity this in developed tools and practices good the Disseminate .program Salvador El/USAID the in actors all involving practice of community a promoting by ,use and adaptation 9 Conclusions Findings in activities the of impact the track to populations migrant potential among opinions tracking in methodology survey” panel “the of advantage Take .migrate to desire and motivation their :FUNDAUNGO To ,gay ,lesbian the and ,indigenous ,disabilities with persons ,youth ,women are who groups vulnerable inclusion of concept its into Incorporate .community) LGBTI (intersex and ,transgender ,bisexual them incorporate to ways formulate and Analysis Inclusion and Gender and Theory Gender of knowledge with capacity institutional its Enhance .policies public on work its of effectiveness the improve to order in ,research and training particularly ,practices institutional its into persons among discussions promote to environment respectful a foster to how and ,training for recruitment inclusive in practices promising its Share Knowledge the through IPs other and officers USAID with them sharing and practices these documenting by opinions diverse very with .USAID at point focal Inclusion and Gender and Management .perspective inclusion and gender a of application the in competent researchers men and women young with roster talent its Expand course the for and ,Policy Public and Government on course certificate the for perspective gender a incorporate to content course the Review .Policy Public in Evaluation and Monitoring 1 BACKGROUND 1. PURPOSE AND AIMS 1.1 Performance Midterm the from recommendations and ,conclusions ,findings primary presents report This Citizen Promoting) USAID (Development International for Agency States United the of Evaluation to is evaluation this of purpose The .7”)activity the (“Activity Salvador El in Policy Public in Participation the) 2; processes electoral in participation citizen improve to USAID of contribution the) 1 :determine society civil how) 3 and; received training the regarding have beneficiaries that satisfaction of level .8processes electoral monitor to capacity greater developed have) CSOs (organizations Democratic the ,Management Mission specifically ,Salvador El/USAID for prepared was evaluation This audiences Secondary .)RPO (Office Program Regional the and ,Office) DGS (Security and Governance and ,Planning ,Policy for Bureau the; Caribbean the and America Latin for Bureau s’USAID include to intends Mission The .Assistance Humanitarian and ,Conflict ,Democracy for Bureau the and; Learning potential and ongoing to evaluation this in identified practices best and learned lessons the disseminate all that ensure to sought have evaluators the and ,actions future s’activity the for stakeholders and ,)IPs (partners implementing ,USAID to useful and ,applicable ,realistic are made recommendations well as issues management key on analysis incorporates evaluation The .relevant deemed as beneficiaries s’Salvador El with recommendations align to aims and activity this from resulting initiatives learning the as .realities contextual current or ,Foundation Ungo Manuel Guillermo .Dr (IP prime the were evaluation the in participants main The local and national the at both ,institutions public relevant ,CSOs ,beneficiaries activity ,)FUNDAUNGO evaluation The 2021. 3, March on initiated was Evaluation Performance Midterm This .USAID and ,levels 2021. 30, April through 2017 26, October from period performance the covers 2021. 30, June to 2020 25, October from extended was date finalization program the 2020, 23, April On and 2024, 31, May to 2021 30, June from ,time second a for extended was activity the 2021, 23, June On $9,996,209. to $4,996,209 from increased was ceiling award the CONTEXT SALVADOR EL AND OVERVIEW 1.2 Overview Activity 2: Table Funding Dates /Number Award Partner Implementing Activity $9,996,209 -17-00004A-519-AID Foundation FUNDAUNGO Citizen Promoting 31, May – 2017 26, October José :activities some for Partners Public in Participation 2024American Central Cañas Simeón Salvador El in Policy Bosco Don ,)UCA (University Latin the ,)UDB (University Sciences Social of Faculty American 9(Program Salvador El FLACSO( public the strengthen to seeks activity Salvador El in Policy Public in Participation Citizen Promoting The policy in actors political and social different of participation increasing by Salvador El in cycle policy democratization Despite .governance improved for challenge pending a as seen long ,formulation Debate Public and Process Electoral the in Participation Citizen of Promotion as agreement cooperation the in Named 7 .Project .(SOW (Work of Statement :I Annex See 8 participation) NDI (Institute Democratic National obtain to possible not was it that stated FUNDAUNGO .cit .op ,SOW USAID 9 .implementation activity the in 2 in citizenry the and parties political the between gap the ,10Accords Peace the by motion in set processes in weaknesses main three identifies description program s’USAID .large remains policies public shaping :process formulation policy the into them translate and proposals their formulate to organizations society civil in capacities Weak) i“( population vulnerable more among accentuated is situation This .makers policy with discussion for topics to State the in mechanisms institutional Weak) ii); (others among ,elders ,women ,people young (groups for spaces Limited) iii (and; policies public of topics relevant in specialists and citizens the to listen 11“.parties political the and ,State the ,organizations society civil between interaction more promoting by governance democratic improve to was activity the of objective principal The electoral of transparency and integrity the strengthening by and policies public inclusive and participatory activity the ,past the in faced has system electoral the challenges and complexity the Given .processes electoral the improving for reforms electoral of proposals formulating in society civil involve to aimed legislative 2018 the including ,processes electoral monitor rigorously to capacity build to as well as ,process .elections municipal and legislative 2021 the and ,elections presidential 2019 the ,elections municipal and :activity this constituted components Four with spaces discussion and agendas citizen of construction the to contributes 1 Component● groups society civil with agendas citizen of elaboration ,candidates council municipal and mayoral framework discussion and debate a of promotion and ,interests thematic diverse representing .platforms into proposals policy of integration the promote to citizens and candidates between processes electoral the of monitoring effective ensure to capacity build to seeks 2 Component● a undertake ,proposals reform electoral of formulation and) cycle 2018/2019/2021 the for( studies technical disseminate and elaborate and ,process electoral the of evaluation participatory .processes electoral the and system electoral the on for Program Policy Public and Government the of Course Certificate a provides 3 Component● It .parties political and CSOs the in leadership emergent the toward oriented ,Leaders Emergent public and ,system political the ,government understand better to capacities strengthen to seeks respectful and ,plural ,diverse a create and; capacity analysis political greater develop; policies .participants among dialogue civil for forum elaborating of process participatory a through” Agenda Presidential “a develops 4 Component● in ,diagnoses’ experts policy technical by produced ,issues policy public key on proposals .CSOs with consultation :are 12results expected principal three he them present and proposals policy public and agendas citizen prepare stakeholders s’society Civil● .authorities government the and ,candidates their ,parties political the to independent an out carry capacities strengthened with organizations society civil and Academic● of set a formulate also and ,cycle 2018/2019/2021 the for process electoral the of monitoring .process and system electoral the improve to proposals T the to end an brought which 1992, 16, January on signed agreements peace of set a were Accords Peace Chapultepec The 10 National Martí Farabundo the and government Salvadoran the between peace established treaty The .War Civil Salvadoran .(FMLN (Front Liberation 16. .p ,Salvador El ,Salvador San ,Mission USAID ,FUNDAUNGO -17-00004A519- AID Description Program 11 17. .p .,cit .Op 12 3 citizen ,governance democratic of understanding improved have CSOs of members and Leaders● .cycle policy public the and ,rights QUESTIONS EVALUATION 1.3 has ET The .order priority in ,)EQs (questions evaluation four following the identified Salvador El/USAID excluded historically including ,groups social or gender with associated differences of analysis incorporated when ,women and men for separately these report and ,).etc ,disabilities with people ,youth (groups .possible in USAID by achieved results unintended and intended significant most the been have What 1: EQ policy public participatory) c ,understanding culture political) b ,monitoring election) a of terms ?education youth) d and ,processes ?agenda policy and reform electoral the influenced activity the has extent what To 2: EQ to contribute strategy outreach and communication s’activity the did extent what To 2.1: EQ 13?agenda policy and reform electoral the influencing culture political understand better to CSOs of capacities developed USAID has extent what To 3: EQ ?processes electoral monitor and the value work recipients the where institutions the of makers-decision and recipients do How 4: EQ ?Leaders Emergent for Program Policy Public and Government knowledge new the applying in face recipients that barriers and hindrances the are What 4.1: EQ ?Leaders Emergent for Program Policy Public and Government the through gained METHODOLOGY COLLECTION DATA 2. APPROACH EVALUATION GENERAL 2.1 notes 14Policy Evaluation USAID The .evaluation performance a of category the into falls evaluation This ,achieved has program or activity particular a what “regarding questions pursue evaluations performance that other and ,occurring are results expected whether ,valued and perceived is it how ,implemented being is it how this ,such As” .making-decision operational and management ,design program to pertinent are that questions to respect with directly attribution measure to seek to than rather and ,study impact an not is evaluation several of one is program the which in situations examines which ,analysis contribution applied it ,activity the also it ,activities specific of results the analyzed evaluation the While .causes contributory potential .change of explanations alternative considers DESIGN METHODS-MIXED 2.2 methods collection data quantitative and qualitative five the of consisting design collection data methods￾mixed a utilized evaluation The 14. May–8 April from place took evaluation the for fieldwork Primary in rigor and quality highest the ensure to selected were methods collection data The .below described They .resources evaluation existing and evaluation the for purpose the given EQs the answering (systematizations ,reports annual ,reports progress ,papers technical (review document) :1included ,Evaluation ,Monitoring s’FUNDAUNGO of database (indicators performance key activity of review) 2 for designed those and surveys available) 4); KIIs (interviews informant key) 3]); MELP [Plan Learning and .(FGDs (discussions group focus) 5 and; evaluation this .activities these includes document Description Activity the in Agreement Cooperative The 13 3. .p ,Policy Evaluation USAID 14 4 REVIEW DOCUMENT 2.3 FUNDAUNGO by provided activity the to pertaining documents 71 reviewed) ET (team evaluation The the by found documents as well as ,)systematizations ,reports annual ,reports progress ,papers technical( is evaluation the for reviewed documents of bibliography A .search literature own its during team .V Annex in presented INDICATORS PERFORMANCE KEY ACTIVITY OF REVIEW 2.4 2018, Years Fiscal for implementation s’activity the monitor to MELP a developed FUNDAUNGO 2018, In to experiences significant most the systematize and activities key evaluate to and 2021, and 2020, 2019, all of database the analyzed and to access full had ET The .practices effective and learned lessons illustrate .area geographic and ,age ,sex by disaggregated also is which ,participants activity INTERVIEWS INFORMANT KEY 2.5 informants key of) persons 2-3 (groups small or individuals with KIIs structured-semi conducted ET The selected of list initial an provided FUNDAUNGO .groups stakeholder program principal representing knowledge hand-first had ,activity the in participation or position their to due ,who ,KIIs for stakeholders Chief ,staff implementing FUNDAUNGO the included interviewed informants Key .EQs the to relevant of participants; members alliance academic); DCOP (Party of Chief Deputy and ,)COP (Party of of participants); level municipal the at policymaking public and participation citizen (1 Component for Course Governance (3 Component of participants); monitoring and reform electoral (2 Component the interviewed also ET The .)Agenda Presidential (4 Component of participants and); Leaders Emergent ET the ,list supplied-FUNDAUNGO the on Based .)AOR (Representative s’Officer Agreement USAID .KIIs 45 conducted DISCUSSIONS GROUP FOCUS 2.6 aspects technical and inclusion of areas the about information gather to virtually FGDs conducted ET The rural 1, Component for :included FGDs the for identified informants The 4. and 3, 2, 1, Components of for; participants reform electoral and observers electoral 2, Component for; participants urban and training and researchers 4, and 3, 1, Components from and; participants Program Diploma 3, Component persons 18 ,participate to invited persons 63 Of .FGDs seven conducted ET The .teachers/facilitators .group focus of type by list the provides 3 Table .invited those of percent 28.5 or participated Group Focus of Type by Participants of Number 3: Table Participated Who .No Attend to Confirmed .No Invited .No Type Group Focus 18-) youth Urban 1: Component woman 1 3 8) old years 29 18-29) youth Rural 1: Component women 2 3 6) old years man 1 Component supervisors woman 1 Supervisor 1 20 and Observers 2: Component participants woman 1 2 10 Program Diploma 3: man 1 and Monitoring 4: Component Course Policy Public of Evaluation participants (adults (women 3 6 8 (adults (men 2 woman 1 4C & 2C 1,C from 4 6 staff Teaching men 3 woman 1 4 5 Researchers man 1 (28.5%) 18 (36.5%) 23 (100%) 63 Total 5 SURVEYS ONLINE 2.7 invitations sent ET The .EQs the for evidence quantitative provide to surveys online used evaluation The those of exception the with ,participants activity s’FUNDAUNGO of database entire the to participate to .component activity each for questionnaire survey a designed also ET The .addresses mail-e no had who .rates response survey the shows 4 Table .evaluation the of duration the for online remained surveys The Rates Response Survey Online 4: Table Component Total Component Participants to Sent Surveys Email with Those Addresses % as Sent Surveys Responses Total Participants All of to Responses % as Survey the Invitations of Sent 720 1 Component 545 ,men 55%( (women 45% 76% 46 ,men 57%( ,women 41% (women trans 1% 8% 111 1,635 6.8% ,men 41% (98% ,men 49% (1,666 2 Component (women 59%) women 51% 3 Component participants 177 completed 161( (course the 156 ,men 46%( (women 54% 88% 46 ,men 57%( ,women 41% (women trans 2% 26% 20 45 44% ,men 40% (100% ,men 36% (45 4 Component (women 60%) women 64% 4. Component for reasonable and 3, and 2, 1, Components for low were rates response ,above seen As of number higher a was there ,activity component each of timeframe the and context the Examining were ago longest completed were activities whose Respondents .activities recent most the for responses .respond to likely least SAMPLING INFORMANT 2.8 the from informants selected ET the ,KIIs For .sampling the for approaches two utilized evaluation The subjects interview suggested of universe the of size the to Due .FUNDAUNGO by sent list informants key by sent informants key of list complete the interview not could team the ,constraints time s’ET the and :names of determination final the conditioned criteria additional two ,Consequently .FUNDAUNGO the of components the in engagement and involvement of degree’ individuals and availability’ individuals facilitators and ,trainers ,advisors technical interview to effort particular made ET the ,example For .activity .offerings course for for defined variables the to according database participant component the filtered ET the ,FGD the For political ,CSO ,territory .,e.i (inclusion for variables applied then and) rural ,sex ,youth for age .,e.i (FGD the Logistical .females 20 and males 20 selecting ,participants the down narrowed and) .etc ,municipality ,party the accepted had FGD per persons eight required the until lists those in people the contacted support invitation the to acceptance of level this achieve to possible not was it ,cases most in ,However .invitation .limitations on section the in stated reasons the for 6 ANALYSIS INCLUSION AND GENDER 2.9 to respond to components activity four the of each across inclusion and gender analyzed evaluation The :steps following the included analysis inclusion and gender The .EQs the including ,trends participation determine to data performance activity of Analysis 1. types and types organization different across geography and ,age ,sex by disaggregation .received training of the answer to participants with survey online an and FGDs through trends data of Exploration 2. the reviewing by and ,EQs general the as well as ,questions analysis inclusion and gender the into issues inclusion and gender integrated they how see to publications FUNDAUNGO .analysis and research with components activity four the across trends statistical triangulating by data of Triangulation 3. .review document and ,KIIs ,FGDs the from findings qualitative group target particular a ,youth of segment the as well as women to analysis gender of Application 4. .project this of METHODOLOGY ANALYSIS DATA 2.10 and reports activity and ,documents technical ,FGDs ,KIIs of analysis qualitative conducted ET The .data performance activity and results survey online of analysis data qualitative and quantitative conducted relating results the for ,perspective after-and-before a :approaches qualitative two used analysis data The the on conclusions draw to approach analysis inclusion/gender a and ,participants of building capacity to .EQ each for ,youth particularly ,groups target for variables inclusion to relating results the of implications LIMITATIONS METHODOLOGICAL 2.11 a through methodologically overcome to sought ET the that limitations several faced evaluation This the as evaluation this for selected design methods-mixed the applied rigorously team The .steps of variety complementary enabled which ,challenges research common mitigating or overcoming of means principal .conclusions and results the validate and ensure best to triangulation information .FGDs and KIIs to and survey online the to rate response low very a was encountered limitation key A to ,Initially .EQs the for analysis quantitative of use the excluded survey online the to responses low The the of percent 100 at informants of size sample the set ET the ,response low potential a overcome sending for exclusion only the as email of lack with ,survey online component each for list participant .use in longer no were that addresses with emails returned many were there ,Nevertheless .invitations survey the and events between lapses time longer that theory the formulated ET the ,results the on Based .rate response lower a in resulted qualitative the for surveys online the in information the used ET the ,rate response low the of result a As FGD and KII for search The .FGDs and KIIs from obtained information the complement to ,analysis from informants potential many called team logistics the Although .challenges same the showed informants .responded list the on informants the of half one than less ,FUNDAUNGO by provided list the the for conclusions ,Thus .analysis qualitative the on solely relied has ET the ,limitations above the Given .findings quantitative with corroborated be not may that insights qualitative on based are EQs :included limitations Other constraints the of because virtually collection data all conduct to need the to linked limitations The● of lack’ respondents from ranging ,pandemic) -19COVID (2019 disease coronavirus the of have may latter The .access internet’ respondents in limitations to platforms virtual with familiarity and frame time specified the within survey the complete to respondents some for difficult it made .rates response survey low to contributed thus 7 some reduced participants former and activity the between communication of absence The● .survey the for call cold a to responding in interest’ respondents identify to variables of database participant the in absence the ,inclusion and gender of area the In● intersex and ,transgender ,bisexual ,gay ,lesbian as such ,USAID by targeted groups vulnerable these of data the in underrepresentation in resulted ,persons indigenous and individuals) LGBTI( .activity the in groups CONCLUSIONS AND FINDINGS 3. obtained information on drawing ,conclusions and findings primary s’evaluation the presents section This In .MELP s’FUNDUNGO from data the and ,FGDs and ,surveys online ,KIIs ,review document the during relative with emerged that themes primary those on largely focused has ET the ,findings KII the presenting .importance particular of be to judged ET the ,context the given ,that issues on or KIIs the during frequency or notes interview from taken quotes include also findings the ,only purposes illustrative For .themes key the of some of understanding the enrich which systematizations to apply often and ended-open and broad are) SOW (Work of Statement s’USAID by posed EQs The components specific the to linked findings The .activity this constitute that components four the of several .question the addressing section each in identified be will AND INTENDED SIGNIFICANT MOST THE BEEN HAVE WHAT 1: EQ 3.1 ELECTION) A OF TERMS IN USAID BY ACHIEVED RESULTS UNINTENDED PARTICIPATORY) C ,UNDERSTANDING CULTURE POLITICAL) B ,MONITORING ?EDUCATION YOUTH) D AND ,PROCESSES POLICY PUBLIC Monitoring Election :A1. EQ 3.1.1 observation and monitoring electoral the ,it In .issues electoral with deals 2 Component s’activity The (18) Eighteen .processes electoral 2021 and 2019, 2018, the document accurately to helped have reports election the after and before published been have documents observation and monitoring election electoral three the of organization the for) TSE (Tribunal Electoral Supreme the by out carried processes .events 15(16 of out 16 (interviewed authorities electoral and ,representatives CSO ,specialists electoral the of All instruments three the cover comprehensively reports observation and monitoring electoral that agreed the ,)PLAGEL (Elections of Plan General The :elections the of organization the for TSE the by used .Calendar Electoral the and ,Budget Election Extraordinary and monitoring electoral the of independence and ,reliability ,rigor the of recognition wide a is There ,specialists electoral of) men percent 93 ,women percent 100 (percent) 90 (Ninety .reports observation reports s’activity the that agreed) 16 of out 15 (interviewed authorities electoral and ,representatives CSO ,methodology the in transparency ,sampling statistical constructed rigorously by characterized been have the allowed has This .bias partisan without ,information and data relevant of presentation impartial and .credibility international enjoy and institutions national for reference a as serve to reports nine-Sixty .effectiveness their limited reports observation and monitoring the of release Delayed (16 of out 11 (interviewed stakeholders of) men percent 64 ,women percent 100 (percent) 69( of recommendations and conclusions the of dissemination limited perceived they that mentioned after and during ,before time real in published been have should which ,reports electoral the weeks three to two reports monitoring presented activity the that found ET The .day election to prior months five to up activities covered reports the that fact the despite ,day election before .women were two and men were interviewees 16 of out) 14 (Fourteen 15 8 nine report second election 2018 the presented activity the ,case extreme an In .day election 2018 the presented and delivered activity the ,However .)1 Figure see (day election after weeks were who ,personally magistrates TSE to reports observation and monitoring electoral 2019 and TSE all to sent was report 2021 The .recommendations the of recipients main the among .well as magistrates after day next the as soon as reports observation preliminary released activity the that found ET The see (day election after days three as late as report election 2018 the published it ,However .day election the that important is it ,sensitive-time extremely are processes electoral within events Since .)1 Figure .future the in times publication hastening considers activity election after weeks 13 to nine between reports observation final released activity the that found ET The agreement the under) days 60 (weeks eight within published be to supposed were they although ,day .(1 Figure see (TSE with signed 2018, in reports monitoring of publication and preparation the between lag time the to Due in 2021 and 2019 for topic single a on focused reports monitoring publish to decided FUNDAUNGO .publication their expedite to order 2019, and 2018 the for Calendar Release Reports Observation and Monitoring 1: Figure Elections .month each within dates represent) blue in marked (cells the in numbers The :Note .project the of Reports Work Quarterly s’Activity on based elaboration ET :Source Conclusions :A1. EQ to related conclusions following the drew ET the ,presented previously evidence the on Based ,credibility international and local of level high a have exercises observation electoral s’activity The● the in uncertainty electoral future of scenarios potential given useful extremely be may which and local ,press the for source reliable a as serve can credibility of level a Such .country ,future foreseeable the for ,that given especially ,actors political and ,institutions international 9 system electoral and political a and position minority a in opposition political a faces Salvador El .counterweights institutional few with to fashion timely more a in disseminated been have could results monitoring and observation The● .activities electoral during TSE the by corrections immediate for needs and complaints highlight more with recommendations the disseminated and published have could also FUNDAUNGO processes electoral of validation facto de giving of risk a is there ,Otherwise .frequency and clarity .fraud electoral substantial or/and deficiencies structural present may that Understanding Culture Political :B1. EQ 3.1.2 in capacity new a place in leaves activity The .Culture Political with deals also 2 Component s’activity The possible it made activity The .behavior political and opinion public in changes measure to FUNDAUNGO the for) behavior political of analysis (field electoral the in study panel a implement to FUNDAUNGO for one ,three (interviewed experts opinion public all and ,suggests 16literature The .Salvador El in time first of collection the that are studies panel of advantages main the of two that ,agreed) men two and woman and; behavior political s’people in change of measurement) 1 :allows) cut longitudinal (time over data .,e.i (variables more or two between correlations identify which ,)collection data single a (studies sectional￾cross to contrast in is This .variables more or two between relationships causal of identification) 2 .(other the causes one which in not but other each to related are variables which in .studies behavior political of conclusions central highlighting or recalling in difficulty some had Interviewees (16 of out 14 (interviewed those of) men percent 86 ,women percent 100 (percent) 88 (eight-Eighty in difficulty some had but studies behavior political the of usefulness and relevance the highlighted for difficult it makes duration activity year-four the While .conclusions or findings specific mentioning .messages clear few retained interviewees ,studies published the from points specific recall to people during studies the on commented who those of percent 100 that found also ET the ,Nevertheless mention to able were ,evaluation this during interviewed were who and ,)five of out five (events launching .notes their consulting when findings the of many (94) four-Ninety .studies behavior political the in produced information the of made be can use More studies the that agreed) 16 of out 15 (interviewees the of) men percent 93 ,women percent 100 (percent that ,example for ,mentioned interviewees different Five .tapped be to yet has that potential great have that and ,changes political ongoing the of reading deep a have to seem not do actors political traditional .studies the of contents the from benefit could they Conclusions :B1. EQ to related conclusions following the drew ET the ,presented previously evidence the on Based in changes understand and measure to capacity technical’ stakeholders increased activity The● political more benefit to potential of lot a has activity of type This .country the in behavior political .CSOs and actors the and production academic between” translation “or bridge a establish to necessary is It● study improve would This .actors political and ,authorities ,CSOs by information of consumption different to them adapting and formats different in available publications making requires but usage of positioning and ,recall ,consumption the facilitate to language and ,content ,form in audiences .conclusions and findings Processes Policy Public Participatory :C1. EQ 3.1.3 participants ,theme this On .processes policy public participatory with deals 1 Component s’activity The Public for Advocacy Citizen on courses the of activities training the that agreed society civil from .surveys Panel 1989. .eds ,Singh .P .M and ,Kalton .G ,Duncan .G .,D ,Kasprzyk 16 10 a present and analyze to capacity their strengthening in effective were Level Local the at Policymaking ,KIIs .policies public existing improve to recommendations generating in as well as problem collective with ,provided courses the with satisfaction of degrees high underscore all survey online the and ,FGDs agreement in) 82 of out 77 (respondents survey online of) men percent 95 ,women percent 92 (percent 94 local as capacities their strengthened had course the that statement the with agreement strong in or public merit which themes effectively communicate and identify to capacity their building by ,leaders had training the that agreed also) men percent 86 ,women percent 95 (percent) 90 (Ninety .attention produced activity the in participated that municipalities 20 All .organization their for useful proven the in whether ,issue the address to steps initial the and problem local common a identifying documents .(3 and 2 Figures see (process development policy new a initiating or policy existing improving of form Local the at Policy Public for Advocacy Citizen on Course on Response Citizen 2: Figure Level 11 Local the at Policy Public for Advocacy Citizen on Course on Response Citizen 3: Figure Level .Salvador El in Policy Public in Participation Citizen Promoting s’USAID of Evaluation Performance Midterm ,Survey Online ET :Source persuade to strategies and activities organize to tools with participants course provided activity The citizen the of adoption The .agendas citizen adopt to officials municipal and candidates party political of) men percent 91 ,women percent 82 (percent 87 While .17challenging more proved ,however ,agendas inclusion the promoting the at aimed activities in participated had they said) 82 of out 71 (attendees course or little that said) men percent 60 ,women percent 46 (percent 54 ,recommendations’ participants the of percent 54 (percent 46 Almost .agenda municipal the in included been had proposals the of nothing up follow no was there As .adopted been had amount sufficient a or some said) men percent 40 ,women the of some whether ascertain to possible not was it ,completion course after activity the into built .point later a at adopted or resubmitted were proposals Citizen and Policymaking Public Municipal on functionaries and actors municipal for provided course The policies public of construction participatory of notion the to receptivity increased generated Participation surveyed those of) men percent 67 ,women percent 100 (percent) 80 (Eighty .problems local address to and openness greater a felt levels different at authorities municipal ,course the of result a as that agreed held) men percent 67 ,women percent 50 (percent 60 and ,agendas citizen toward predisposition positive percent 100 (percent) 80 (Eighty .fora public in agendas citizen of presentation the of opinion favorable a them for useful been had courses the that felt also respondents survey of) men percent 67 ,women roles the ,policymaking municipal of understanding their enhancing in ,institutions their for and ,individually .policymaking local of dynamic and processes the and ,council municipal the of attributions and percent 50 (percent 40 ,members CSO for course the of participants the with findings the to Similar citizen the from everything or most the said surveyed actors municipal of) men percent 33 ,women percent 67 ,women percent 50 (percent 60 and ,agenda municipal the into integrated been had agendas to this attributed actors municipal among respondents KII .integrated been had nothing or little said) men targeting course one ,However .)women percent 44 ,men percent 56 (municipalities 20 in participants 720 had Component The 17 municipal targeting course complementary a while ,)women percent 54 and men percent 46 (persons 386 by attended was CSOs the constituted women ,Thus .)women percent 33 and men percent 67 (persons 334 by attended was staff and members council .positions Council Municipal from minority a and society civil from participants of majority 12 of context the in dialogue for capacity limited” “,participation of tradition/culture civic a of lack “the “.parties political of culture closed “the and” ,polarization political Course Participation Citizen and Policy Public Municipal 4: Figure Course Participation Citizen and Policy Public Municipal 5: Figure .Salvador El in Policy Public in Participation Citizen Promoting s’USAID of Evaluation Performance Midterm ,Survey Online ET :Source Conclusions :C1. EQ to related conclusions following the drew ET the ,presented previously evidence the on Based ,content to respect with designed well as participants by recognized broadly were courses The● and characteristics the to tailored-well and ,facilitators experienced by implemented competently enabled FUNDAUNGO from team facilitating the of experience The .participants the of needs educational the to content training and methodology the adapt to need the to respond to them 13 the in participating specialists and analysts for need the as well as ,participants the of backgrounds to capacity specialized more to policymaking public in expertise their adapt effectively to courses to responding in flexibility and resilience demonstrated activity The .problems local to respond .project the of course the during arose that challenges technical and methodological diverse original the in included not was which ,component this in up follow of integration the of lack The● about learned lessons meaningful draw to ability s’activity the limited significantly ,design activity ,ended course the After .training advocacy and building-capacity of effectiveness term-longer the eventually were proposals policy which to extent the track to action formal no took activity the or improved be can efforts training such how analyze to difficult it made This .adopted citizen of adoption the to barriers and obstacles constitute factors what identify or ,strengthened in building capacity of process a represents component this that aware is ET the While .proposals the on exclusively validated not is that municipalities with building bridge and generation proposal to not opportunity lost a is it ,not or agendas citizen the adopt municipalities whether of basis .results such affect that work at dynamics and factors underlying the explore additional Providing .impact the limited course the of termination the with component this Ending● the analyzing and proposals their of adoption the for advocate to CSOs to support technical have would agendas citizen the disseminate and socialize to strategies the of effectiveness have not need process advocacy the to support This .course the of impact the increased that cycle policymaking the of feature key a represents it ,rather ,activity additional an constituted Support .18classroom the beyond experience the expand to dimension a introduced have would could it; FUNDAUNGO by provided been have necessarily not need process advocacy the for .activities such in specialize that institutions or organizations other by provided been have Education Youth :D1. EQ 3.1.4 educational the in leaders emergent young of participation to pertaining findings the presents section This .project the by offered opportunities include that those as understood be should” Groups Vulnerable “,inclusion analyzing of purposes For Country The .community LGBTI the and ,persons indigenous ,disabilities with persons ,youth ,women internally on focus increased an includes also 2025–2020) CDCS (Strategy Cooperation Development .persons displaced four all under Salvador El in policy public in youth of participation the promoted has activity The the illustrating 4, Figure in cycle a as depicted is promoted has activity the that process The .components .levels government national and local the at policy public of advocacy and formulation for route ended course the after months for ,design component original the in contemplated not was it as ,level informal an At 18 of advocacy the for participants course the to support and advice practical provide to continued instructors the of some ,fora dialogue citizen ,organizations community to presented were proposals these of Some .proposals agenda their .proposals original the enriched which process a ,functionaries municipal and 14 s’Citizen a from Policies National and Local Formulating of Process : 6 Figure Perspective .identified process underlying illustrating design ET :Source level local at whether ,cycle the of stage a in advancement promoted has activity the of component Each ,groups vulnerable incorporating ,)4 and 3, 2, Components (level national the at or) 1 Component( presented data All .disabilities with persons and ,individuals LGBTI ,communities rural ,youth particularly .women of inclusion the illustrate to sex by disaggregated are cycle policy public the in participate to youth educating of Results advocacy an initiate to municipalities in citizens young of capacities the strengthened 1 Component to continued have they said interviewed participants the ,training the After .policy public local for process pregnancy teenage ,protection civil ,graveyard Zaragoza .,g.e (municipalities the in agendas their follow more needed they felt youth ,However .changed governments municipal their though even ,)prevention to assistance technical and proposals out flesh to building capacity further with ,course the after support this in participants total The .issues their advance help could that institutions other with collaborate percent 64 ,settings rural from percent 36; women percent 54 ,men percent 46 (386, were component ,Component this in participants total the of percent 43 represented Youth .)settings urban from percent 60 (communities rural from were youths all of percent 40); men percent 45 ,women percent 55( .(men percent 40 ,women formulate to participation citizen use to how in and policy public in trained were officers municipal Young show to detail more provide could proposals ,officers municipal to According .policy government local the in them promoting for process the simplify and implemented be could advocated solution the how percent 24; women percent 33 ,men percent 67 (participants 334 had training municipal The .council percent 38 (youth were percent 13.4 ,officers these Among .)settings urban from percent 76 ,rural percent 32 ,men percent 68 (settings rural from were percent 42 ,those Of .)men percent 62 ,women .(women percent 42 and men percent 58 (settings urban from percent 58 and) women 15 policy public the for improvement of areas showed survey online 1 Component the in responses 87 The percent 20 including ,)women percent 17 ,men percent 20 (respondents of percent 37 among training percent 2 and ,LGBTI percent 2 ,youth male percent 7 ,youth female percent 9 (groups vulnerable from :included Inclusion and Equality Gender for improvements ,areas these Among .)rural or mothers were who some for since ,day teaching the of length the Shorten :issues Participation● .challenge a was day whole the staying ,caregivers .youth and women of representation increase ,staff teaching the Among :issues Inclusion● topics in presenters were women two only cohort my In .men older were presenters of majority the“… (FGD 3 Component ,Youth Male” (.communications to related is improve to aspect An .trainers as persons all from representation more need generations new“… (FGD 3 Component ,Youth Male” (.presenters as youth and +LGBTIQ ,women more) have to( as ,perspectives diverse disaggregate to tools analytical provide to need is There :analysis Gender● group vulnerable of presence the ,However .tools concrete provide not did activity the during understood and heard be to perspectives their in differences the allowed participants .tools analytical of lack the for compensated partially This .discussions analytical culture political electoral in youth educating of Results the during process electoral the of observers as people young of participation the encouraged activity The 18 between were observations the in participants all of percent 62 of total A .elections 2019 and 2018 percent 51 ,men percent 49 (observers election of percent 79 constituted Youth .age of years 29 and persons of percent 8 and ,)women percent 56 ,men percent 44 (supervisors the of percent 13 ,)women different from came people young These .)women percent 47 ,men percent 53 (substitutes as reserve in .(men percent 19 ,women percent 81 (citizens independent were ,percent 35 ,category largest the ,sectors academic from came ,)men percent 40 ,women percent 60 (percent 22 ,category largest second The ;(men percent 25 ,women percent 75 (CSOs from percent 9 :included categories Other .institutions regional from percent 7); men percent 75 ,women percent 25 (institutions public from percent 9 institution cooperation international an from percent 4); men percent 67 ,women percent 33 (institutions .(men percent 14 ,women percent 86 (other ,percent 15 and); women all( compliance its assess to how on them trained and process electoral the to youth exposed 2 Component evidence of process the to participants exposed further component This .regulations and laws with .norms legal with compliance verify to ,observation through gathering The .participants of perceptions the to insight some provide 2 Component for results survey online The electoral the in) 1,635 (participants overall the of percent 6.8 represent that responses 111 had survey percent 70 ,persons 46 (percent 42 were persons young ,respondents these Among .database observer of some as following the perceived respondents that showed survey The .)men percent 30 and women :observers electoral as participation the of effects the the evaluate to trained well feel people young made experience observation electoral The● (percent 61 (persons 28—observe to designated were they boards receiving-vote the of activities were) percent 39 (persons 18 and ,)men percent 29 ,women percent 71 (agreement full in were .(men percent 33 and women percent 67 (agreement in —participants survey young of percent 89 to according ,others train to enough trained felt Youth● percent 41 and) men percent 27 ,women percent 73 ,participants 22 (agreed percent 48 .(men percent 37 ,women percent 63 ,participants 20 (agreed completely 16 policy public and government in youth educating of Results ,governmental the of knowledge acquire to opportunity the youth of sets diverse provided 3 Component the ,approved and formulated are policies public which in environment economic-socio and ,political of quality the praised Respondents .cycle policy public the and ,development their in trends historical .presenters the of strength and delivery ,it presented and history the knew that persons with space privileged ,small a have to pleasure a was It“ 3 Component ,Youth” (.presentations luxury with compensated was this ,tired being of spite in that so (FGD people 109 ,total In .country the throughout leaders young emerging targeted Program Diploma The ,(men percent 49.5 and women percent 50.5 ,participants 161 of percent 68 (program the completed .(men percent 37 and women percent 63 ,participants total of percent 32 (adults young were whom of 52 of replicas four the throughout equality gender and diversity of level high a reflected participants These :including ,program the departments 14 the of 11 in municipalities 41 from came participants Program :diversity Territorial● percent 59 ,participants 161 the of percent 57 (participants) 91 (one-Ninety .country the in Salvador San :departments three in municipalities four from came) men percent 41 and women .(percent 3 (Ana Santa and ,)percent 4 (Libertad La and) percent 13 (Tecla Santa ,)percent 37( .municipalities 37 from originated) men percent 51 ,women percent 49 (participants 70 other The participated ,Libertad La from man a ,disabilities with person one ,participants 161 the Of :Disability● .program the in ,youth as such ,vulnerabilities acknowledged-self showed also survey online The :groups Vulnerable● were who respondents) 22 (two-Twenty .rural and ,identity gender and orientation sexual .(transgender percent 5 ,male percent 45 ,female percent 50 (participated persons vulnerable ,women nine ,people 15 (youth percent 68 included they ,vulnerability of type by Disaggregated woman one including ,)men two ,woman one (LGBTI percent 24); ages various of ,men six and and ,youth one ,men two (rural percent 9 and; woman transgender one and rural/LGBTI/)female( .(adult young one and inclusion on perceptions the of some provided 3 Component for survey online the in Responses percent 29 representing ,survey the completed persons) 46 (six-Forty .training the during equality gender Diploma four the in) transgender percent 2 ,men percent 57 ,women percent 41 (participants 161 the of ,(13) women percent 45 (old years 29 to 18 from were percent 63 or persons 29 ,range age By .Programs .((16) men percent 55 to according ,course the taking after vote to youth motivate to was learning the of effect secondary A Among .)transgender percent 2 ,men percent 48 ,women percent 35 (respondents survey of percent 85 .percent 46 was this ,participants group vulnerable used respondents survey youth the of percent 18 that analysis political for capacity developed course The ,policies public for proposals of design the approach to percent 6 another and ,context social the analyze to municipalities in) men young three ,women young three ,man adult one and youth three (persons 10 while .making-decision for recommendations and ,strategies ,plans formulate to it used Male…” (groups the with context current the of analysis the and processes learning to contributed It“ (Survey Online ,youth Male…” (acquired knowledge the practice into put have I agreements municipal for decisions making In“ (Survey Online ,adult 17 incisive an preparing in works government how of knowledge the apply to able was participant Another .displacement internal forced on proposal practical and through ,that policies public and ,system political the ,government the of knowledge provided course The during problems shared have that groups influencing successfully of chances s’youth improved ,proposals ,men percent 54 ,women percent 40 (respondents of percent 96 to according ,processes electoral .groups vulnerable from respondents of percent 52 including ,)transgender percent 2 and environment confrontational-non ,open an in work to possible is it that youth taught course The percent 54 ,women percent 39 (respondents of percent 95 to according ,view of points different discuss ,Further .groups vulnerable from respondents of percent 54 including ,)transgender percent 2 ,men is it indicated) transgender percent 2 ,men percent 46 ,women percent 26 (respondents of percent 74 to sectors among alliances form to capacity the promotes that environment an have to possible also vulnerable from respondents of percent 39 only ,However .proposals agenda or policy public their advance .similarly responded groups policy public for) E&M (Evaluation and Monitoring in youth educating on Result consultation the during occurred area this in participation youth for opportunity one 4, Component Under percent 57 ,people 158 of participation a with ,events eight (territories the in delivered workshops ,people 43 of participation with ,events four (workshops thematic the and ,)men percent 43 ,women known not is it so registered not were ages’ participants ,However .)men percent 46 ,women percent 53 .process this of part were youth whether young to opportunity an provided Policy Public for Evaluation and Monitoring on course s’4 Component basic presenting by policies public of progress the up follow to capacity develop to leaders emergent public monitor to indicators how of knowledge incipient and ,E&M ,cycle policy public the of knowledge .developed are policies by offered course online one the in participated) men percent 36 ,women percent 64 (people 45 ,Overall In .)men percent 33 ,women percent 67 (participants the of percent 47 constituted Youth .activity the two although ,residents urban as registered were participants the of all ,diversity participant of terms :sectors of variety a from came participants Young .rural as reported-self respondents survey online ,CSOs from) men percent 40 ,women percent 60 (percent 22 ,institutions sector public from percent 47 percent 9 ,)NGOs (organizations governmental-non from) men percent 50 ,women percent 50 (percent 9 ,academia from each percent 2 and ,)men percent 50 ,women percent 50 (government local from .media the and ,institutions cooperation international respondents 19 with survey online 4 Component the from responses by informed are below results The women percent 57 (percent 37—youth were seven whom among ,)participants course of percent 42( :included youth these among course the of Results .))three (men percent 43 and) four( topics the of understanding and experience adequate and good had youth ,delivery training In● percent 50 ,women percent 50 (respondents survey youth) seven of four (percent 57 ,taught .agreed completely)) one (men percent 33 ,)two (women percent 67 (percent 43 and agreed) men ,involved stakeholders the and problems public identify to capacity s’youth built course The● .((two (men percent 33 ,)four (women percent 66 (respondents of percent 86 to according by manage ,instruments policy public identify to respondents youth 19 the trained course The● and) four (women percent 57 to according evidence on based policy public approach and ,results .(three (men percent 43 and ,functions ,objectives the understand to respondents youth 19 the trained course The● men percent 43 and) four (women percent 57 to according system monitoring a of structure .(three( 18 types and ,characteristics ,usefulness the define to respondents youth 19 the trained course The● .(three (men percent 43 and) four (women percent 57 to according ,E&M for indicators of with evaluation an understand to trained felt they said) six (percent 85 ,respondents youth Among● .((three (men percent 50 ,)three (women percent 50 (focus gender a :the included strengths course 2021, 3, May on participants with conducted FGD virtual a to According ;policies public of demands and management on provided bibliography date-to-Up● who those for recordings including ,materials transferring in crucial was which ,classroom Virtual● ;sessions attend not could and; profiles professional different of participants to useful was which ,content Course● and responsibilities and agendas work overcome to easier it made which ,format virtual/Online● .anywhere ,moment any at lessons the take opt to courage the have to me allowed course The “.learning continue to inspiration an it found also Youth good the of because ,policies public of research the in management knowledge in degree s’master virtual a for (participant FGD ,youth Male” (.course this in had I experience Conclusions young among capacity and skills build and education provide to tools useful developed has activity The monitoring and ,advocating ,formulating in ,groups vulnerable across and sexes both of leaders emergent selection participant inclusive an from range tools These .levels national and local the at issues policy public comprehensive a and ,perspectives diverse discuss to environment respectful a providing to ,process .Program Diploma the for curriculum training accountability and advocacy of area the in initiatives other strengthen only can that practices Promising that environments training of development the and ,methodologies delivery ,contents course include collaboratively to alliances and view of points opposing across bridges build to experience practical provide .ground common through issues promote urban and rural both in youth reach to practices successful developed also has activity the ,Operationally and equality gender support to profiles diverse with participants course select and recruit and ,settings .inclusion ELECTORAL THE INFLUENCED ACTIVITY THE HAS EXTENT WHAT TO 2: EQ 3.2 ?AGENDA POLICY AND REFORM Findings 3.2.1 ,women percent 100 (percent 88 to according ,feasible technically are proposals reform electoral The eight the in proposals the that agreed who) 16 of out 14 (interviewed those of) men percent 86 of view of point the from either ,supported adequately and justified technically are memoranda s’issue institutional-political or/and ,jurisprudence and legislation Salvadoran ,legislation comparative .evolution agreed also) 16 of out 13 (interviewees the of) men percent 76 ,women percent 100 (percent) 81 (one￾Eighty .system electoral Salvadoran the to relevant are proposals reform electoral the of contents The and national the at both ,agenda reform electoral the of art the of state the within are proposals the that Latin or/and Salvador El in years several for discussion under been have reforms These .levels regional discussion this promote to society civil of call the to contributes proposals the of Publication .19America .reform of type this as well as .Latina América en Electorales-Político Reformas Las .)2018 (.C Mendoza Uribe .,F Freidenberg 19 19 and Congress of Members with reforms electoral about discussions depth-in facilitated activity The third s’activity the of end the At .experiences international to exposure as well as authorities electoral electoral the improve to proposals and studies present to held were events 20 ,)2020 September (year deputies ,CSOs of representatives with) third the in six and second the in six 1, Year Fiscal in eight (system of Members All .magistrates TSE and ,Assembly Legislative the of Commission Reforms Electoral the of approach the valued) men all ,three (TSE the of officials and) man one and woman one ,two (Congress for allowed meetings closed for space and speakers international the of quality the that highlighted and .discussions level-high experience with CSOs of representatives the All .challenges faced reforms the of feasibility political The ,two (interviewed Congress of Members the as well as ,)five of out five (parties political with dialogue in of selection the if favored highly been have would viability political that agreed) man one and woman one .depth-in more parties political the with discussed been had reforms the of timing and ,approaches ,topics ,bills drafting) 1 :to discussions preliminary of phase the from advance to possible it made have would This the into bills incorporating) 3 ,)ley de initiative (Assembly Legislative the into bills introducing formally) 2 Commission the in opinion favorable a issuing) 4 ,discussions and agenda s’Commission Reforms Electoral onset the ,hand other the On .plenary legislative the in reforms the approving) 5 and); favorable dictamen( the of as authorities government by declared lockdown mandatory the and pandemic -19COVID the of Reforms Legislative the of agenda the modified and difficult work the made 2020 of quarter first .Assembly Legislative the of and Commission substantive a represented) 4 Component (Agenda Presidential the of proposals policy public eight The to effort systematic a represented effort the that agreed 20)10 of out 10 (interviewees the of All .agenda the during candidates presidential the to agenda representative widely and ,extensive ,diverse a present percent) 90 (Ninety .election presidential next the for valid remain will proposals These .election 2019 selection strategic the that agreed) 10 of out nine (interviewees of) men percent 88 ,women percent 100( period longer a for relevant be to them allow reforms proposed the of approach macro the and issues of .time of alliance academic three the and FUNDAUNGO .versions two in drafted were proposals eight The of development technical and approach the with document a prepared) FLACSO ,UDB ,UCA (members reading candidate and team campaign facilitated which” ,document proposal “shorter a as well as ,topic the .document the of the of each with event an Holding .candidates presidential the with channel dialogue a opened activity The with directly proposals eight the of three share to opportunity the provided campaigns presidential four and presidential the ,)FMLN (Nacional Liberación la Para Martí Farabundo of case the In .candidates the the only ,coalitions/parties three remaining the of case the In .participated candidates presidential-vice Republicana Alianza ,País Nuevo un para Alianza coalition the For .participated candidates presidential-vice and ,)PDC (Cristiano Demócrata Partido ,)PCN (Nacional Conciliación de Partido ,)ARENA (Nacionalista presidential-vice both ,)GANA (Nacional Unidad la para Alianza Gran and ,)DS (Salvadoreña Democracia .plans government s’party their of preparation the of charge in were candidates the with interaction limited had and extemporaneously documents produced activity the ,However the At .election 2019 the of date the beyond extended documents the of Production .teams campaign document final the and ,produced been had documents eight the of three only ,election the of time documents drafting of process the time not did activity The 2021. in completed was) education inclusive( four the among coordination for need and requirements research rigorous the meet to adequately percent 50 ,percent 75 (interviewees four of out three to according ,activity the of institutions member beyond ,addition In .process editing or production documents the in involved) men percent 100 ,women .women were two and men were interviewees 10 of out Eight 20 20 staff or teams campaign the with interaction no or little had activity the ,event delivery document the .proposals the of discussion or ,explanation ,up follow for members Conclusions 3.2.2 2: EQ to related conclusions following the drew ET the ,presented previously evidence the on Based .relevance and feasibility technical of terms in strengths present proposals reform electoral The● of actors political among awareness promoting and educating to contributed have proposals The .reforms electoral with forward move to need the ,feasibility increase To .viability political is proposals reform electoral the of challenge main The● and ,approach ,selection the during occur should parties political with dialogue of processes the dialogue in intense are that processes Reform .reformed be to issues the of scope of definition is This .day of light the see to tend ,phases initial the during starting” ,negotiation “political and increasing :as such ,interest much had not have parties political where issues in ,especially ,case the .financing their regulating or women of participation political the .candidates presidential the with dialogue of channel a opening allowed that approaches term￾medium with ,exercise structured-well a represented agenda presidential the of proposals The● teams campaign the of dynamics and nature the with familiar more become to need a is There● design the for production Academic .timelines campaign electoral to according processes plan and political with interaction greater requires but advocacy political with compatible is policy public of and parties political of needs information and dynamics the on based design process a and actors .makers-decision AND COMMUNICATION S'ACTIVITY THE DID EXTENT WHAT TO 2.1: EQ 3.3 REFORM ELECTORAL THE INFLUENCING TO CONTRIBUTE STRATEGY OUTREACH 21?AGENDA POLICY AND Findings 3.3.1 events 20 held Consortium Academic the) 2020 September (activity the of year third the of end the At and studies present to) three year fiscal during six and ,two fiscal during six ,one year fiscal during eight( ,authorities governmental ,members CSOs year to system electoral Salvadoran the improve to proposals fiscal during four (events 13 held Consortium Academic the ,way same the In .institutions academic and presidential the to related proposals policy public present to) three year fiscal during nine and two year events These .events the attended) men percent 50 ,women percent 50 (people 354 ,total In .agenda closed and ,events online ,conferences press ,workshops ,presentations report ,events launch :included One .activity the of strategy dissemination and promotion media the with compliance in ,discussions electoral the received they ,periodically ,that confirm also interviewees the of percent) 100 (hundred .FUNDAUNGO from mail-e via documents and observation members included Recipients .proposals policy public and reform electoral the received actors level-Top and political top as well as ,advocacy policy public and agenda electoral in CSOs relevant of leaders and s’activity the in defined as ,recipients secondary and main to outreach accomplishing ,authorities electoral proposals mentioned the sent FUNDAUNGO ,extent lesser a To .strategy outreach and communication .journalists and representatives media to press and) networks social in posts (networks social via dissemination traditional been has there Although for media social and ,technology ,media mass of use creative of evidence little found ET the ,conferences .activities these includes document Description Activity the in Agreement Cooperative The 21 21 Cooperative the of) Plan Marking and Strategy Branding (D Attachment in stated as ,promotion activity the 22.FUNDAUNGO and USAID between Agreement to indicators quantitative any contemplate not did plan strategy and branding the that found ET The annual and Quarterly .effectiveness promotion and communication s’activity the evaluate and monitor follow for indicators no but out carried were that events public the of records detailed included reports .results outreach intended the evaluate to difficult it makes This .up Conclusions 3.3.2 2.1: EQ to related conclusions following the drew ET the ,presented previously evidence the on Based transmitting and recipients key reaching in successful been has strategy communication The● to space opening and way traditional a in events private and public different during information .agenda policy public and electoral the on proposals reform promote to related messages key underpinning in short fallen have campaigns media traditional and Digital● Public .technology of use creative more a through agenda policy public the and reforms electoral long relatively for messages key of repetition and promotion active the requires advocacy policy .opinion public on and makers-decision on impact an make to time of periods TO CSOS OF CAPACITIES DEVELOPED USAID HAS EXTENT WHAT TO 3: EQ 3.4 ELECTORAL MONITOR AND CULTURE POLITICAL UNDERSTAND BETTER ?PROCESSES Findings 3.4.1 General and 2019, 2018, the during field the in supervisors and observers 2,200 deployed and trained activity The Vote (Votos de Receptoras Juntas for instructions electoral the covered training The .elections 2021 and ,activity the by built instruments observation election ,TSE the by developed) Boards Receiving The .purpose that for designed application electronic an through data observation election of transmission ,elections 2021 and 2019 the for supervisors and observers for manuals training produced also activity .practices international best following the Of .experience field the and training the of quality the with satisfied are observers election The ,survey the answered who supervisors and observers) men percent 41 ,women percent 59 (111 percent 77 (exercise observation election an in time first the for participated having reported percent 75 ;trainings the of quality and duration the with satisfied were them of percent 94); men percent 71 ,women very felt them of percent 98); men percent 94 ,women percent 92 (experience field the with percent 98 ;(men percent 96 ,women percent 95 (exercise observation the of end the at empowered and trained well felt percent 87 and ,)men percent 96 ,women percent 97 (again participate to willing are percent 96 men ,percent 82 women (8 and 7 Figures in shown as ,else someone train or explain to confident .(percent 93 section Promotion Project 83, .p 22 22 and Experience Field with Observers Election Surveyed of Level Satisfaction 7: Figure Elections 2021 and 2019, 2018, During Received Training and Experience Field with Observers Election Surveyed of Level Satisfaction 8: Figure Elections 2021 and 2019, 2018, During Received Training 2021. April ,activity the of supervisors and observers electoral to survey Online :Source 23 methodology panel a develop to FUNDAUNGO trained University Vanderbilt of specialist academic An the ,specialists pollster academic interviewed to According .behavior political in changes measure to study attrition low relative a maintaining :challenges technical main two the managed adequately studies panel the to attention adequate and) time over survey the answering stop who people the of percentage (rate same the answering when responses’ interviewees in arises that bias the .,e.i ,problem conditioning panel time in moments different at questions Leaders Emergent Young culture political understand better to capacity CSO of development the ,leaders emergent young Among knowledge new their taking members CSO youth through occurred has processes electoral monitor and of spread This .colleagues with share or/and work their in use to organizations their to back skills and the at organizations grassroots many of capacity the enhanced and reached has skills and knowledge testimonies these of Examples .territories in CSOs level-national and NGOs as well as ,level municipal :that state achieve to power the with institutions the to take to strategies these formulate to taught were We“ (participant FGD 1C ,member CSO ,youth Female…” (them working was I youth to procedures these taught I ,Everything with Youth of team the in trainer a was I“ 1C ,member CSO ,youth Female…” (knowledge of transfer a was there course this to thanks ,with (participant FGD participants the when continued building capacity significant that indicated participants women with KIIs capacity organizational largest the possibly ,training 1 Component the after CSOs their to returned and ,action of lines followed ,issues the of ownership assumed CSOs These .activity the in building .rule the or exceptions were interviewed those if unclear is it although ,efforts advocacy continued she organization the (in ,difference the see we organization an in working now ,gender to regard With“ .(participant FGD 1C Female…” (childhood since applied is it) works currently (pregnancies teenage (problem the visualized government local the that was) course the of (benefit One“ agenda s’association our of part as it with through follow to Then .it for solution a seek maybe will and (informant member CSO ,Female 1C…” (benefit another was municipality the within it on work to and be could CSOs on effect the ,participants of database FUNDAUNGO the using by 1, Component In 119 numbered CSOs from participants Youth .participants CSO of number the on based estimated from were Most .participants all of percent 73 represented and) men percent 45 ,women percent 55( cultural ,brigades ,councils ,committees ,associations youth including ,organizations youth level-community Development Community as such organizations adult from and ,networks ,centers outreach ,organizations ,sectors other from came participants remaining The .Techo as such NGOs and) ADESCOS (Associations ,(percent 6 (individuals unaffiliated ,)percent 5 (programs institution public ,)percent 16 (academia mainly .(percent 1 (parties political and and observers of affiliation organizational the record not did database participant the 2, Component In sample small the given findings extrapolate cannot but question this asked survey online The .supervisors four (11 of total a with ,)percent 6.6 or participants 1,666 with component a in respondents 111 (size percent 68 (respondents young 47 the among ,However .CSO of members as) men seven ,women ,them Among .CSO a to belonged) men two and women three (persons five) men percent 32 ,women .statement the to indifference expressed man the while others training of capable felt women the only Diploma all of) men percent 68 ,women percent 32 ,persons 34 (cent per 21 only 3, Component In national as well as territories the from CSOs included These .CSOs from came participants Program :included They .NGOs ;Network s’Educator Morazán● 24 ;Salvador El of Children the of Friends● ;(CECADE (Democracy for Center Training● ;Cuscatlán in Youth of Empowerment● ;(ISD (Democracy for Initiative Social● ;Tutal Somos● ;(.L.R de ACACU (Miguel San ,Union the of Credit and Loans for Association Cooperative● ;(FUNDEMAS (Action Social for Foundation Enterprise● ;(JLAC (Center Rights Human and Aid Legal Jerusalem● ;Salvador El of Students and Youth of Association● ;Person Young the of Council National● ;Colatino Diario● ;(FUSALMO (Foundation Savior World● ;Salvador El of Leaders Voluntary and Solidarity● ;Service Social Passionist● ;Culture and Art Through Action in Youth● ;(FUNDASAL (Housing Minimum and Development for Foundation Salvadoran● and; Young Vote● .Transforming Women● of cycle the of understanding an and advocacy in skills stronger from benefit can that organizations are All .policy public (16) Sixteen .parties political and sector academic the included sectors society civil participating Other of University the including ,sector academic the from came participants Program Diploma the of percent National ,FUNDAUNGO included that tanks think and ,Delgado Matias José University ,Salvador El Development Social and Economic for Foundation Salvadoran the ,)FUNDE (Development for Foundation on Research for Program Regional and ,FLACSO ,Studies Strategic Higher for Center ,)FUSADES( ,members Consortium Academic the with KIIs to According .)PRISMA (Environment and Development universities the of capacity advocacy ,manner limited more a in ,and research the strengthened activity the .project the with associated strengthened were parties political from individuals While .activity the in participated also parties Political the ,officials elected become to successfully it using many ,capacity and knowledge political their in from aside ,program the from benefit to likely less are ,rules traditional their imposing by ,institutions Nuevas ,FMLN ,Democrático Cambio from participants young had program The .seats elected gaining ,PDC ,FMLN ,ARENA of Groups Parliamentary the and ,PCN ,Vamos ,ARENA ,Tiempo Nuestro ,Ideas the that perception the noted participants Program Diploma with interviews in ,However .GANA and formal party established by hampered is parties political the within acquired knowledge the use to ability .practices informal and content the on based was leaders young by transmitted culture political of understanding improved The content course the ,D1. EQ in discussed previously as ,Program Diploma the of case the In .courses the of ,Salvador El in culture political in trends current and origins the of understanding better a to contributed :included topics Program Diploma .cycle policy public the to relevance its and ;system political the Understanding● ;State Salvadoran the for foundation legal The● ;communication political in Skills● of perspective historical a from process social and ,economic ,political the of Understanding● and; Salvador El .policies public of cycle the of framework contextual and conceptual The● 25 the in actions to translated culture political of understanding better the ,responses survey online on Based .below 4 EQ in 5 Table in listed as products effective more to led that workplace Conclusions 3.4.2 General 3: EQ to related conclusions following the drew ET the ,presented previously evidence the on Based new a and) FLACSO ,UDB ,UCA ,FUNDAUNGO (institutions academic four leaves activity The● best international following observation electoral independent making of capable base citizen are parties opposition future the where scenarios potential in tool useful very a is This .practices de Receptoras Juntas in had traditionally have they than presence less have may and diminished .processes electoral the during counterweights exercise to Votos political in changes of time a at relevant is FUNDAUNGO by studies panel conduct to ability The● been has regime political a as democracy for support citizen where ,Salvador El in behavior parties political national main two the for sympathy ,23years 20 last the in percent 50 by reduced to percent 81 from gone has share vote legislative combined their and ,24points 45 by fallen has 2021.25 and 2006 between percent 19 researchers junior experienced more of cadre a ,research their conduct to methodologies date￾to-up more with members alliance academic three the and FUNDAUNGO provided activity The● of experience the and ,policy public create or improve to advocate to research conduct to .partners academic with working from move to FUNDAUNGO in observed was change no ,advocacy policy public to regards With● .products their using advocacy political deliberate towards role tank-think established its social add to than other ,change not did produced information the disseminating for Procedures fit to practices institutional of adaptation of evidence no was there; outreach of means a as media FUNDAUNGO Although .makers-decision political with advocacy of requirements the with their of number a presenting policymakers with groups discussion some and events organized .strategy advocacy formal a constitute not did this ,publications electoral of advantage take to time in purpose this for outputs produce not did activity The● key how of knowledge institutional in increase evident no was there ,addition In .opportunities deliberately not did activity the and; provided information the use to motivated be may makers￾decision when timing the of nor ,operate making-decision policy public in stakeholders political to adjustments internal make not did FUNDAUNGO As .delivery information after up follow ,future the in ,issues policy public of advocacy robust the towards talents considerable its channel and mandate whose organizations or institutions with alliances key make to imperative is it .advocacy of type this to suited are toolbox Leaders Emergent Young ,culture political on knowledge updated bring to conduit good a been have CSOs from participants Young new their apply to tend youth ,above seen As .organizations their to back ,policy public on particularly .perform they work the in skills and knowledge .CSOs from came sector the of percent 73 since impact for potential largest the had 1 Component this In .increase to have would participants youth of proportion the impact greater a have to ,However ,persons 119 (CSOs from youth were participants the of percent 16.5 only ,age of terms in ,program .(2018) Latinobarómetro :Source .percent 33 to percent 67 From 23 .(years several (Gráfica Prensa La :Source .percent 15 to percent 60 From 24 .(2021 2006,) TSE :Source 25 26 people young more had Program Diploma the 3, Component In .)men percent 45 ,women percent 55 percent 55 (persons 34 ,CSOs from came participants young of percent 21 only ,however ,participating .(men percent 45 ,women INSTITUTIONS THE OF MAKERS-DECISION AND RECIPIENTS DO HOW 4: EQ 3.5 POLICY PUBLIC AND GOVERNMENT THE VALUE WORK RECIPIENTS THE WHERE ?LEADERS EMERGENT FOR PROGRAM Findings 3.5.1 General course the where institutions the from respondents among consensus strong revealed evaluation The professional’ participants strengthening to contributed Program Diploma the that worked participants .tools knowledge useful and relevant with participants providing by ,institutions their as well as ,capacity ,women percent 50.5 ,participants total of percent 68 (activity the completed people 109 ,total In ,women percent 63 ,participants total of percent 32 (adults young were whom of 52 ,)men percent 49.5 .(men percent 37 the in useful content Program Diploma the considered participants survey 3 Component Online This .)transgender percent 2 ,men percent 45 ,women percent 37 (percent 84 to according ,workplace the where ,26course the of systematization s’activity the in reflected strongly also was sentiment a in ,as concretely institutions their in use to received training the put they felt interviewed participants .roles making-decision and influence of positions occupied already participants the ,cases of number of level the of perception the ,)section following see (participants course with FGD the in ,However merits which finding a ,respondents groups vulnerable with percent 42 to dropped course the of usefulness ,institutions those in staff and makers-decision other interview to possible not was it While .analysis future to staff returned consistently institutions these that fact the that noted directors and participants course .offered building capacity the valued they that reinforced training for courses the ,areas concrete of range wide a in course the from derived knowledge apply to able were Participants ,respondents survey 3 Component Among .content course the of utility and relevance the to testifying applications of range The .examples specific provided and useful Program Diploma the found percent 95 analytical the strengthening); percent 19 (organizations their of members or/and peers training :included policy public preparing); percent 17 (solutions policy formulate to reality social current on capacity in decisions make to strategies and ,plans action ,recommendations preparing); percent 14 (proposals ;(percent 7 (CSOs other joining by participation political improving); percent 9 (councils municipal to projects preparing); percent 4 (activities communication political and social effective more developing their and proposals policy public present to efforts making and); percent 2 (leaders train and lobby .(percent 2 (process electoral the in implications Young by Course Diploma the in Acquired Knowledge the of Use of Examples 5: Table Persons Course Diploma the in Acquired Knowledge the of Use Participant Youth CSO participation of areas different in analysis Political security citizen to related policies public of monitoring to linked research to Contributing (content training (processes political different in participation citizen youth promoting ,activities organizational In system political the of analysis daily Performing projects Formulating para elaborado consultoría de Informe .Públicas Políticas y Gobierno en Diplomado del Sistematización de Informe 2021. .Claudia ,Solís 26 systematization the for collection data of process The 2021. de marzo de 19 ,Salvador San .Ungo Manuel Guillermo .Dr Fundación la ,panelists ,professors ,directors ,coordinators (Diploma the of actors main the with interviews of cycle a through out carried was interviews collective ,)people young said nominated who people or organizations/institutions and ,Diploma the of graduates young .participants young with group focus a and ,team coordination and management the with 27 matters economic and social in policies public Analyzing elections last the in discussions political in involvement Increasing the of role the regarding learned was what relating ,Chalatenango in displacement forced on investigation an In state Salvadoran scenarios future possible the and country the of scenario political the about people different to Speaking organizations other for training political Facilitating .Course Diploma the from Participants FGD by Commentary :Source few are there—gap important an filled it as Program Diploma the valued particularly Participants .experts and analysts experienced highly from training political rigorous receive to opportunities :because ,informants three to according ,continue should Program Diploma The economic and social ,political the how know to and understanding allows ,useful very is content the“… (Survey Online ,youth Female…” (works country the of system Female…” (democracy in credibility little very and citizens the among training political of lack a is there“… (Survey Online ,youth going] is [participation and capacities leadership strengthen to parties political traditional of work the“… (Survey Online ,Youth Female…” (ago years two lived one the than greater crisis a through experience the made that Program Diploma the in features unique of range a to pointed Participants whom of many ,participants the of diversity/plurality the them among ,powerful and effective particularly of atmosphere an and ,positions and views political differing with persons to exposure previous little had discussion a ,implementers/organizers course the by generated confrontation-non and tolerance valued highly Other .polarization significant of context political national a in rare is that environment constitutional and juridical; management policy public on modules were course the of components its ,State the of structure the; challenges political and economic current of analysis rigorous a; matters .communication political strategic and; them between relationship the and ,functions institutional Leaders Emergent Young that institutions the to useful been has program the ,participants Program Diploma young to According with contact in remained has that informant key a to According .courses various the to them nominated council as some ,councils municipal in participating are beneficiaries 1 Component ,participants program ,program the during ,when awakened politics electoral in interest Their .advisors as others and members a longer no was logic party political the that ,problem larger a of part was problem their realized they .required was advocacy that and ,response valid an on worked who organization s’women local a from participant a ,level municipal the at CSOs Among its for recognition municipal gained organization her that reported pregnancies teenage prevent to agenda pregnancy teenage of issue the brought organization The .participation her of result a as area that in work issue the put organization the ,respond not did municipality the though even ,and council municipal the to prevention and education and advocacy conduct to action of line a developed and agenda own its in national gained also efforts advocacy s’organization The .schools municipal three in girls with activities a for Law the of accountability municipal for councils local of network the of support the and recognition .(ISDEMU (Women of Development the for Institute Salvadoran the of Violence of Free Life municipal a became ,party political young a of member a is who ,informant key female 3 Component A party her ,addition In .Program Diploma the in learned she what applied she where ,member council to led which ,programs other in participate to her encourages and knowledge new her welcomes trainings these of both in gained knowledge The .accountability social on program ISD an in participation .projects municipal for advocate to party her helped 28 become should courses these believes he that stated Program Diploma the of participant male young A already have who those for available become should courses up-follow that and ,nature in permanent of out that noted He .positions elected in now are participants if particularly ,Program Diploma the taken ,elections last the during positions to elected were seven or six ,course his in participants 30 to 25 national the “since ,topics the of knowledge their strengthening continue to need they that declaring “.issues these of vanguard the in be to need we persons young as and evolving is situation participants 161 the of percent 28.6 or respondents 46 had Program Diploma the for survey online The respondents total of) 29 (percent 63 represented respondents Young .program the completed that found they ,respondents the of perceptions the Among .))16 (men percent 55 ,)13 (women percent 45( ,women percent 41 (percent 91 to according ,workplace the in useful content Program Diploma the this ,However .respondents survey online 3 Component all of) transgender percent 2 ,men percent 48 uses the ,groups vulnerable Among .respondents’ groups vulnerable among percent 52 to dropped level their to capacity analytical improved an applying included acquired knowledge the of workplace the in ;proposals advocacy in or Assembly Legislative the for initiatives law of preparation the in it using; work political s’organization the improving; CSOs in especially ,colleagues among knowledge the replicating on stand political a take to youth other incentivizing and; CSOs other with articulating when participation .them to matter that issues new their of result a as opened been have work of areas new no said respondents survey of majority The ,However .)transgender percent 2 ,men percent 37 ,women percent 24 ,percent 63 (knowledge percent 22 including ,)men percent 20 ,women percent 17 (opened had areas new that said percent 37 .groups vulnerable among ((four (men percent 15 ,)three (women percent 9) (seven (percent 24 ,respondents survey young Among the during gained knowledge of result a as opened have that work of areas new of examples provided a ,post election popular new a ,policies public of analysis or studies :include These .Program Diploma the of application ,officer Project Health a ,Team Communications a ,affairs political of commission a from ,and ,teams planning project joint ,enterprises in) SDOs (Objectives Development Sustainable adult of percent 37 the Among .issue priority a as policies security monitoring ,participant LGBTI for Tables for methodologies and ,training ,processes training new seeking reported they ,respondents .listening active with Dialogue Conclusions 3.5.2 General 4: EQ to related conclusions following the drew ET the ,presented previously evidence the on Based that areas thematic of range a in training provided ,participants the by valued highly ,course This● highlighting ,institutions respective their in use practical into translate to able were participants .needs’ participants to tailored-well and ,practical ,relevant was course the could that impact building-capacity about information provided respondents survey 3 Component● measure that mechanisms monitoring in-built through implementation course during tracked be of utility the ,numbers participation track that systems than rather ,building capacity in impact .limited is which training political of paucity the and ,decade last the over CSOs of growth significant the Given● of results the share and disseminate to FUNDAUNGO for need and space is there ,opportunities .broadly more component this 29 Leaders Emergent Young change of agents as act to motivation the with people young provided have courses training s’activity The diverse in practice into gained have they knowledge the put and workplaces or organizations their within .activities ,advocacy toward applied be to continued knowledge ,particular in women ,informants key youth Among supporting toward and ,concern of issues resolve to help that programs implementing and planning toward were respondents The .peers training including ,organizations their of work the in actions diverse suggests strongly evidence Anecdotal .advocacy citizen in engaged remain to chosen have who participants into them steered and men and women young many of lives the impacted positively has activity the that .work they where institutions public and municipal the in or organizations their through roles citizen active RECIPIENTS THAT BARRIERS AND HINDRANCES THE ARE WHAT 4.1 EQ 3.6 THE THROUGH GAINED KNOWLEDGE NEW THE APPLYING IN FACE ?LEADERS EMERGENT FOR PROGRAM POLICY PUBLIC AND GOVERNMENT Findings 3.6.1 General knowledge new the of application their to barriers significant feel not did respondents of majority The that confirmed survey online and FGD the both from Statements .Program Diploma the in obtained were respondents of percent 85 ,survey 3 Component online the In .barriers few perceived participants ,(men percent 46 ,women percent 39 (Program Diploma the in acquired knowledge new the apply to able percent) 15 (Fifteen .)men percent 33 ,women percent 26 (group youth the of percent 39 including percent 2 ,men percent 11 ,women percent 2 (knowledge new the use not could they responded and knowledge new the apply to able were percent 48 ,groups vulnerable the Among .)transgender that felt recipients many ,fact In .)woman transgender percent 2 ,men rural percent 4 (not were percent 7 active make to ,making-decision of positions in including ,institutions their within placed-well were they closed and rigidity the was respondents by noted hindrance major The .knowledge acquired the of use .systems party political the of nature which in environment wider the included also knowledge new of application greater to constraints The impact the of sustainability The “:that noted program the of 27study A .embedded were participants the on depends also but ,participants young selecting and recruiting for strategies the ,offering course the on depends the where organizations in “that noting leader CSO one with” ,setting wider the of conditions political-socio the their with contribute can they where and ,heard be can they where space a have already t’don work graduates impossible it find might they ,parties political particularly ,institutions these of structure the to due and ,training new by characterized not are country the in parties political traditional The .capacities new their of use make to “.change to openness or innovation is leaders young surprised has that hindrance a ,leaders emergent party political among that revealed KIIs discourse the for lines party established are there because practice into put be can learned they all not that ,CSOs in ,KIIs to According .knowledge new their applying from them preventing barriers as centeredness￾adult older and parties political within processes democratic of lack the saw Youth .follow to actions and .barriers face not did sexes both of leaders young by acquired knowledge the of application the insights useful provided Program Diploma the regarding ET the by conducted survey online the While and measure to mechanism a that strongly felt participants program ,it valued recipients how regarding analyze to up follow as well as ,important was advanced course the as training the of results the evaluate three ,activity the of year third the During .utility term-long its and training the of sustainability the .cit .op .Claudia ,Solís 27 30 lecture master a provide to course the of ae/alumni all for held were” Graduates Diploma for Encounters“ ,knowledge acquired’ participants of utilization the on experiences share to and issue contemporary a on important an constituted events these While .participants by useful highly considered was that space a on feedback time-real important FUNDAUNGO offered have would mechanisms E&M ,activity up-follow greater for opportunities create to way the along enhanced and strengthened be can program the how .impact term-long Leaders Emergent Young application the to barriers any perceive not did respondents survey online most ,Program Diploma the In their of aspects different to it applied having about enthusiastic were they ,Rather .knowledge acquired of :example For .work Program Diploma the in acquired knowledge new the applied respondents ,survey 3C online the In● included This .))21 (men percent 46 ,)18 (women percent 39) (39 (percent 85 to according .youth were who)) 15 (men percent 33 ,)12 (women percent 26 (percent 59 to according ,barriers experienced they said old years 35 and 30 between men adult few a Only● stated barriers The .))one (women transgender percent 2 ,)two (men percent 4) (three (percent 6 the replicate to resources of lack ,)male one (work at policies public on done is Little :were .(male one and LBGTI one (it do to where places or knowledge mainly was Program Diploma the taking for leaders emergent young of motivation primary The● to according ,works system political the how and cycle policy public the of knowledge acquire to strengthen to or)); 11 (men young percent 22 ,)seven (women young percent 14 (,)18 (percent 36 ,(one (women young percent 2 (,)five (percent 10 to according ,capacity leadership political their .((one (transgender adult percent 2 ,)three (men adult and young percent 5 percent 67 ,purpose stated their served course the that found participants survey of majority The● and ,)transgender percent 2 ,men percent 43 ,women percent 22 (participants survey of Respondents .fulfilled was motivation their reported ,groups vulnerable among percent 30 influence they how and process their learned and policies public of cycle the learned I “:claimed regarding learning the with especially expectations exceeded “course the” ,development social “.contacts of network my strengthened I “and” ,communications political percent 35 (participants of percent 89 among content course the with satisfaction was There● .groups vulnerable among percent 82 and) transgender percent 2 ,men percent 52 ,women the in provided opportunities educational the with satisfaction expressed respondents ,Furthermore few are there that indicated responses KII ,addition In 4. and 3 Components for surveys online .aspirations political with leaders young for knowledge of type this acquire to available opportunities Conclusions 3.6.2 ,workplace the in challenges to training the of application the in barriers fewest the faced participants CSO their of use making to impediments greatest the faced parties political to linked participants those while of lack ,change to resistance of evidence substantial is there as surprising not is This .knowledge new traditional the within transformation generational and innovation of absence and ,democracy internal political such of use better make can CSOs that suggests also evidence The .Salvador El in parties political .change effect to alliances institutional effective more building including ,training its and training the with satisfaction Their .barriers few encountered have leaders young Emergent when particularly ,policy public and culture political in training more for demand generated has usefulness to extends demand This .formulation policy public through problems solving to oriented are trainings the candidates aspiring as or CSO their in advocacy in work they whether ,groups vulnerable and ,women ,men .parties political in 31 CONCLUSIONS INCLUSION AND GENDER GENERAL 4. MEN AND WOMEN YOUNG FOR RESULTS 4.1 political ,advocacy for interventions youth future in invest to assets generated has activity The :of consist These .accountability government and ,participation the with leaders emergent men young 652 and women young 674 Training :capital Human 1. abilities their strengthening; processes policy public in participate to skills and ,tools ,knowledge public a within purposefully more act to or parties political or CSOs of members active become to .citizens individual as or ,government in officials elected as ,institution young emergent select and ,recruit ,reach to practices effective ,new Developing :practices Effective 2. up opening thus ,levels national and municipal the both at groups population diverse from leaders .groups population excluded formerly from leaders male and female to access and ,methodologies teaching ,content educational implementing and Developing :content Knowledge 3. the for ,cycle advocacy and formulation policy public the of stages different for programs training .(4 and 3 Components in (level national and) 1 Component in (level municipal of perceptions the track to applied be could that methodology survey panel the Using :skills New 4. .groups population migrant potential and gathered be can that courses the of each from alumni) a :behind Leaving :capital Social 5. from alumni of range wide a) b and; issues shared of advocacy for networks form to strengthened different from advocacy for networks form can thus who society public and civil of sectors various .settings INCLUSION AND GENDER ON PERFORMANCE ACTIVITY OVERALL 4.2 surpassing ,MELP its in established targets indicator inclusion and equality gender the met has activity The of section broad a included has also It .participation youth and equality gender of areas the in targets the .groups vulnerable other ,activity the of part latter the in ,and ,society of sectors organized ,territories the of staff teaching the of composition the in was met not was equality gender where area only The the where ,politics electoral and culture political to related courses for particularly ,Program Diploma I Modules to related courses the for particularly ,professors 24 listed the of percent 34 was gap gender II and) System Political the of Analysis and Understanding Strengthen to Tools Theoretical of Provision( .(Based is State Salvadoran the Which Upon Framework Legal Institutional the on Knowledge of Provision( an as act both inclusion and gender on indicators monitoring performance that shows evaluation This .generated knowledge and information the enriches and perform to incentive in women on study research the in and agendas citizen municipal the in issues s’women key of Inclusion sex incorporate all studies research The .objectives empowerment women supported politics identifying to lead that issues explore not did they ,However .gaps gender on remarked and disaggregation would that domains analysis gender apply not did and matter research the in equality and roles gender .28violence school on study the in example for ,recommendations profound more to lead the in requirements 205) ADS (System Directives Automated fulfilling include not did design activity The of participation the for targets set it did nor ,Policy Empowerment and Equality Gender the of application Cooperative the since ,met not were terms these that state cannot evaluation the ,Thus .groups vulnerable .requirements targeted the in them include not did Agreement would there ,framework conceptual research the in included focus gender a been had there if ,researcher the by stated As 28 .matrix analysis gender the to related observations some on expand to opportunity an been have 32 particularly ,perspective inclusion and gender a apply to opportunities missed has activity the ,Nevertheless own s’FUNDAUNGO and produced work the to applied standards academic level-high the given :include omissions and achievements Some .norms inclusion and gender established increasingly it make to selection and recruitment of process the improved activity the While● research develop not did it ,)targets indicator meeting thus (balanced-gender and inclusive electoral for conducted investigations the into analysis gender incorporated that frameworks .proposals policy public for and reform content training of development the for or ,researchers or trainers for reference of terms The● and perspective gender a of application the in experience have to “criterion a as include not did “.tasks their of performance the in analysis gender USAID that training staff the of rest the with share to practice institutional not was it ,addition In● for Inclusion and Gender on activity the of life the during personnel monitoring to available made .29IPs the in analysis inclusion and gender apply to efforts that acknowledged staff activity the ,interviews In Management .assistance technical of lack and knowledge insufficient by hampered were research male majority for reason the and policy recruitment institutional an as meritocracy cited informants could matter content the ,Nevertheless .Program Diploma the for balance gender the in staff teaching issues gender address to important was it where out point to specialists gender by reviewed been have .content modify to and 2025–2020 CDCS THE FOR LEARNED LESSONS AND PRACTICES GOOD 4.3 PROGRAMS activity this ,)DOs (Objectives Development three its and goal 2025–2020 CDCS the of context the In extension the during applied be can that inclusion and equality gender for practices relevant developed has .initiatives program USAID upcoming in and activity the of phase subsequent the and ,Program Diploma the for groups vulnerable diverse recruiting in success s’activity The inclusion and equality gender for policies USAID with compliance that shows ,groups these of performance effective more these achieving to Key .results advocacy effective more promote can groups vulnerable of this that something is which ,beneficiaries targeted reaching for mechanisms the are efforts advocacy .successfully do to able was activity these (are 2025–2020 CDCS the of DOs the achieving to relevant activity the by developed practices The :(document the from cited excerpts are individuals vulnerable most the target to ,Migrants Likely for Increased Security 1: DO of Requirement● and national improve to strategies develop to; communities their and) migrants likely .,e.i( to and; communities and individuals vulnerable to provided services government municipal they services and ,programs ,policies the for advocate to communities and individuals empower :are results activity Useful .security and safety improve to need most those include that citizens selecting and targeting for practices developed 1 Component o to alliances make and priorities their identify to citizens these training for and ,vulnerable .governments local their in them for advocate and proposals formulate and groups vulnerable from leaders included ,Program Diploma the with 3, Component o through leaders elected as serve to whether ,policy public and culture political in them trained for training provided ,MEL for Initiative the through USAID ,program) MEL (Learning and Evaluation ,Monitoring the of part As 29 2018.–2017 from group Adaptation and Learning Collaborative Inclusion and Gender a supported and IP of staff monitoring 33 public in officers as serve to or ,CSOs their in citizens as advocate to ,parties political .institutions to “,Improved Transparency and Accountability ,Responsiveness Government 3: DO of Requirement● and ,for pay ,plan to abilities’ associations municipal and’ governments municipal targeted strengthen strong a on build to “with coupled” ,citizens to services public municipal and business ,security key deliver more and ,groups advocacy citizen vibrant and active more promote to foundation society civil :are results activity useful ,DO this For” .parties political responsive and representative ,agendas citizens formulating and ,researching ,identifying in skills developed 1 Component o municipal formulate to participation citizen of use make to councils municipal training and better for locally advocate to groups vulnerable enable will skills These .programs and policy .programs and parties political in roles up take to leaders emergent to skills provided 3 Component o .level national a at communities their for advocate to and CSOs to adolescents for programs training leadership linking require opportunities these ,useful truly be To coordinating means This .groups vulnerable more the targeting ,activity this in those like programs other and ,International Plan ,Vision World as such NGOs among training leadership other of supply the with more incorporate and boys and girls train to working already are which ,others among ,Children the Save .adolescents for training leadership in content politics electoral and culture political vulnerable in youth of advocacy and leadership strengthen to opportunities the complement To● inclusive more research their make can ,investigations policy public their in ,tanks think ,groups the of segments different affect problems how of evidence unveil to data disaggregating by .population who researcher a to according which ,methodology survey panel the introduced activity the ,addition In migrant potential in perception in changes track to suited well is ,implementation its in participated .populations RECOMMENDATIONS 5. MONITORING ELECTION ON 5.1 ,results the disseminate further and observation electoral of rigor scientific maintain To● to advocacy to dedicated institutions partner specialized with alliances seek should FUNDAUNGO are reports monitoring election of recommendations and findings which with clarity the strengthen .presented should FUNDAUNGO ,observation electoral independent for capacity the increase and maintain To● to years election between supervisors and observers electoral trained with contact periodic maintain electoral as such ,projects other or trainings Small .resources human in capacity installed losing avoid .time over observers with relationship a maintain to sought be can ,work field research UNDERSTANDING CULTURE POLITICAL ON 5.2 political as such (audiences potential with interviews and workshops conduct should FUNDAUNGO● information and ,hypotheses ,questions investigate to order in elaboration s’study a to prior) parties providing aid would This .have may) journalists or representatives political .,g.e (actors that demands .study the of effectiveness the increase and questions their on feedback with audiences potential ,basis ongoing an on behavior political in changes measure to capacity the increase and maintain To● in sampling of relevance the analyze and studies panel implementing continue should FUNDAUNGO 34 or horizon time year-five a over year a once .,g.e—behavior political monitoring for depth greater .post ex and ante ex event electoral each sample training political of paucity the and decade last the over CSOs of growth significant the Given● Certificate s’FUNDAUNGO as such ,courses for support continue should USAID ,opportunities CSOs in leadership emergent toward oriented are which ,Policies Public and Government in Course .parties political and Certificate their making consider should FUNDAUNGO ,responses positive’ participants Given● similarly are that courses hold to institutions other enlisting possibly and ,permanent Program .robust academically and politically AGENDA POLICY PUBLIC AND REFORM ELECTORAL ON 5.3 a as process electoral the and products of timing the in alignment ensure should FUNDAUNGO● necessarily not did reports and elections the of timing the that was evaluation this of finding principal .up line into parties political the of agenda political and calendar the take should FUNDAUNGO and USAID● between ground middle find better to proposals reform electoral preparing when consideration full the defining when especially ,parties political the of that and reforms electoral of vision s’society civil may lobbying or advocacy to dedicated institutions partner specialized with Alliances .reform of scope .process advocacy the of phase this in helpful be document policy public for procedures standard establish to manuals advocacy employ should USAID● ,process advocacy structured more a design FUNDAUNGO help may documents Such .formulation and campaigns of needs the of analysis ,phases mapping stakeholder :as such ,steps defined clearly with the of definition ,channels influence of analysis ,spaces making-decision of analysis ,actors political .others among ,plan activity and strategy influence STRATEGY OUTREACH AND COMMUNICATION ON 5.4 ,effectively more it use and produced information the of rigor scientific the maintain To● in campaigns communication in specialized institutions with alliances seek should FUNDAUNGO and findings present effectively more to) agencies media .,g.e (media digital and traditional .recommendations published of versions different produce teams communication that ensure should FUNDAUNGO● different to findings targeting/tailoring .,g.e (guidelines editorial account into taking ,documents using ,years and countries between situations comparing ,points illustrate to examples using ,audiences .(.etc ,infographics ,language simpler POLICIES PUBLIC INCLUSIVE AND PARTICIPATORY MORE PROMOTING ON 5.5 LEVEL LOCAL THE AT in mechanisms E&M incorporate CSOs for activities based-course that ensure should FUNDAUNGO● and ,course the during participants and trainers from feedback time-real provide to both design their the assess to means and learned lessons identify to training of quality and impact the measure later to .actions the of sustainability with objectives advocacy as well as design policy public both include which courses training For● support up-follow course-post include should FUNDAUNGO ,parties political and actors municipal This .participants the by advocated as ,proposals society civil presenting and developing for activities the of design the in phase lobbying necessary the for activities advocacy robust including requires If .groups society civil for agendas citizen of elaboration the for as such ,future in courses for activity which organizations with partner actively CSOs ensure ,toolkit the of part not is support advocacy .skill important crucially this on focus or developed have 35 INCLUSION AND GENDER ON 5.6 :USAID To 5.6.1 the in inclusion and gender for indicators made-custom including by performance IP good Ensure● measure and migration irregular to vulnerable most groups the for set targets measure to MELPs .situation their to appropriate are that results activity ,COPs includes that staff technical IP among practice of community a of establishment the Promote● practices promising of exchange the promote to ,personnel E&M and technical especially and ,DCOPs with best work and reach to how on particularly ,performance improve to adapted be can that .groups vulnerable share to leaders young among practice of communities of formation the IPs among Promote● .culture political and policy public in experiences and knowledge analysis inclusion and gender of application the in expertise include ,nature this of activities future In● technical for reference of terms the in mab201 ADS and 201 ADS and 205 ADS to according :as such ,personnel ;researchers and trainers of recruitment for Criteria o material teaching of development the in analysis inclusion and gender apply to Requirement o and; content ,collection data ,research of framework the in analysis inclusion and gender apply to Requirement o .recommendations of formulation the in for as well as investigations for analysis and to ,populations migrant potential among opinions tracking in methodology survey panel the Promote● .migrate to desire and motivation their in programs the of impact the track :FUNDAUNGO To 5.6.2 ,disabilities with persons as such ,groups vulnerable add to policy institutional inclusion its Expand● territorially and socioeconomically of definition broad the to ,individuals LGBTI and ,people indigenous .used currently populations excluded inclusion and gender adopt; associates and staff to building-capacity inclusion and gender Provide● of skills and knowledge the strengthen; institution the for knowledge of area new a as analysis inclusion and gender develop and; analysis gender and theory gender in associates and staff permanent proposals make thus and ,policies public in inequality of causes the address that practices research .population wider a for appropriate be would they as ,adopt to feasible more :as such ,products knowledge as practices inclusion promising share and Develop● and; 3 and 1 Components in developed processes selection and recruitment the for Guides o among debate and ,exchange ,discussion for environment respectful a fostering for guide A o and ,peaceful ,inclusive more a promoting thus ,society of sectors different from participants .democracy productive (men and women (researchers young of database a selecting and recruiting by roster talent its Expand● and gender a with topics approaching in competent are who ,politics electoral and culture political in with ,lectures review least at or ,courses teach to upon called be can who and ,perspective inclusion .experts other for perspective gender a of Evaluation and Monitoring and Policy Public and Government the for content course the Review● enhance would perspective inclusion and gender a where topics identify and courses Policy Public .perspectives these with topics those of content the strengthen and policy public 36 37 ANNEXES 38 WORK OF STATEMENT 1: ANNEX (SOW (WORK OF STATEMENT Salvador El/USAID Public in Participation Citizen Promoting USAID the of Evaluation Performance Final Salvador El in Policy Evaluation the of Purpose .A contribution the) 1 :on Salvador El/USAID inform to is Evaluation Performance Final this of purpose The that satisfaction of level the) 2 processes electoral in participation citizen the improve to USAID of more have organizations society civil the how) 3 and ,received trainings the regarding have beneficiaries evidence empirical provide to serve will evaluation the ,addition In .processes electoral monitor to capacity .improvement continuous and learning document will and issues management on the ,Management Mission particularly ,Salvador El/USAID be will evaluation this of audience principal The Other .)RPO (Office Program Regional the and ,Office) DGS (Security and Governance Democratic the and America Latin for Bureau the are results evaluation the in interested USAID inside audiences and Conflict ,Democracy for Bureau the and; Learning and ,Planning ,Policy for Bureau the; Caribbean .Assistance Humanitarian to evaluation this in identified practices best and learned lessons the disseminate will Mission The the apply even may Mission The .activities similar future for considered be to stakeholders Party Political and Integrity Electoral “awarded newly the in evaluation the of recommendations Processes Political and Elections for Consortium the by implemented ,”Activity Strengthening .Strengthening with 2021, FY of quarter second the of end the for scheduled is Evaluation Performance Final This period the cover will evaluation The .activity the of implementation of left months three approximately 2020. 31, December through 2017 26, October from Information Background .B and Number Award Partner Implementing Activity Funding Dates Citizen Promoting Public in Participation Salvador El in Policy “Ungo Manuel Guillermo .Dr“ (FUNDAUNGO (Foundation Central” Cañas Simeón José “:Others Don ,)UCA (University American Latin the ,)UDB (University Bosco Sciences Social of Faculty American National the and ,)FLACSO( (NDI (Institution Democratic -17-00004A-519-AID 30, June2017- 26, October 2021 $4,996,209 (“Activity the (“Activity Salvador El in Policy Public in Participation Citizen Promoting the of purpose The public inclusive and participatory more promoting by governance democratic improve to contribute to is leaders of capacities the improve and processes electoral of transparency and integrity the and policies electoral the on influence an have and participate can they so) CSO (organizations s’society civil and .agenda policy public of formulation and setting the on and processes :results intended three has activity The them present and proposals policies public and agendas citizen prepare stakeholders s’Society Civil 1.R .authorities government the to and candidates their ,parties political the to 39 independent an out carry to capacities strengthened with organizations society civil and Academic 2.R proposals of set a formulate to also and 2018/2019, cycle the for process electoral the of monitoring .process and system electoral the improve to democratic of understanding improved with organizations s’society civil of members and Leaders 3.R .cycle’ policies public the and rights citizen ,governance :components four has activity The and Mayor for candidates with discussion for spaces and agendas citizen of Elaboration 1. Component interests aggregate to contribute which groups from agendas citizen of construction :councils municipal the which in debate for framework a promote and groups local thematic and sectorial of preferences and proposals some of incorporation the assess and them know to get can parties political the from candidates from concerns more or one describe and address agendas Citizen .platform electoral respective their in for space a in candidates the to presented be could that solution for options develop and groups interest specific and services public to access as such issues local to refer may agendas the; discussion .rights participation or ,abuse ,discrimination as such approach complex a with issues or ,opportunities reform electoral of formulation and) 2018-2019 (processes electoral the of Monitoring 2. Component ,call ,register electoral ,)organisms temporary and permanent - institutions (process electoral :proposals final and ,transmission report electoral and counting ,campaign electoral ,candidates of registration technical of dissemination and preparation and ,process electoral the of evaluation participatory ,)results .processes electoral the and system electoral the about) papers (studies in Course Certificate “The :Policies Public and Government in Course Certificate 3. Component the in leadership emergent the toward oriented activity learning a is” Policies Public and Government about understanding better a for capacities Develop) i (:purposes three has that parties political and CSOs the for capacities practical some develop) ii; (policies public and system political the ,government the .participants the between exchange respectful of forum plural a create) iii (and; analysis political and develop to aims that initiative an is” Agenda Presidential “The :Agenda Presidential 4. Component developed ,policies public of topics strategic and key in proposals of set a way participative a in promote .organizations society civil with consultations ,diagnoses rigorous and technical on based specialists by Questions Evaluation .C El/USAID by identified been have ,order priority in ,questions evaluation main four following The terms in Report Final the in them present clearly and them answer should Team Evaluation The .Salvador questions-sub the answer should Team Evaluation The .purpose evaluation the to relate they how of main the answer to questions-sub the of analysis and collection data the use and report the in separately possible of analysis ,feasible extent the to ,incorporate should Team Evaluation the ,addition In .questions ,youth (groups excluded historically particularly ,groups social or gender with associated differences As .women and men for separately these report and ,).etc ,populations indigenous ,disabilities with people when barriers related-social other or ,age ,gender consider should Team Evaluation the ,example an .country the in knowledge new apply to obstacles the analyzing terms in USAID by achieved results unintended and intended significant most the been have What 1. policy public participatory) 3 ,understanding culture political) b ,monitoring election) a of ?education youth) 4 and ,processes ?agenda policy and reform electoral the influenced activity the has extent what To 2. to contribute strategy outreach and communication s'activity the did extent what To 2.1 ?agenda policy and reform electoral the influencing culture political understand better to CSOs of capacities developed USAID has extent what To 3. ?processes electoral monitor and 40 the value work recipients the where institutions the of makers-decision and recipients do How 4. ?Leaders Emergent for Program Policy Public and Government knowledge new the applying in face recipients that barriers and hindrances the are What 4.1 ?Leader Emergent for Program Policy Public and Government the through gained Analysis and ,Collection Data ,Methodology Evaluation .D a combines that design methods-mixed experimental-non a ,evaluation performance this For techniques qualitative customized with data quantitative existing of analysis rigorous ,comprehensive stakeholders and ,beneficiaries ,partners ,counterparts of range wide a from data primary elicit to designed linkages elucidate to data complementary of triangulation for allows approach This .recommended is methods possible of range a consider should Team Evaluation The .outputs and inputs activity between The .thoroughly questions evaluation the address to data the analyzing and collecting for approaches and among dialogue and collaboration enhance will that activities and methods participatory of use applicable follow should methods analysis and collection data ,Further .required is counterparts all of confidentiality and safety ensure to security data on guidance) IRB (Board Review Institutional .evaluation the of purposes the for information or data providing individuals the in included be will analysis and plan collection data ,approaches and methods evaluation finalized The begin collection data and visits field before approval and revision for USAID to submitted Plan Evaluation Evaluation USAID the with comply should proposed) s(method The .)below section Deliverables see( .Policy relevant of review desk a) i :minimum a at ,include will evaluation this for plan collection data The ;Plan Learning and ,Evaluation ,Monitoring; plans work and Agreement Cooperative the such documents group focus or/and interviews informant key) ii and; prepared papers or studies and; reports Performance El/USAID .applicable when men and women of participation of opportunity equal promoting discussions ,coded be will results the and; collected be to data quantitative and qualitative both expects Salvador alternate/additional propose to encouraged is Team Evaluation The .content for analyzed and ,triangulated robust ,stimulating yield can consider they that Plan Evaluation the in methods analysis and collection data .questions evaluation the of each answering in evidence ,validity of standards quality data five the with comply must data and systematic be shall collection Data will protocols group focus or/and ,survey ,interview Specific .timeliness and ,reliability ,precision ,integrity should questions the; CAM/USAID from approval with finalized and Plan Evaluation the to appended be this of purpose the address and document this in listed questions evaluation the answer to used be .evaluation as disaggregation of level much as have must questions evaluation the to response in collected data All data all ,Policy Empowerment s’Women and Equality Gender USAID per and ,minimum a At .possible men on effects between differences any for analyzed as well as ,sex by analyzed and disaggregated be must .participation female and male or women and documents relevant of review Desk cooperative the as such ,documents relevant all with Team Evaluation the provide will Salvador El/USAID ,results expected the including) s(amendment its and FUNDAUNGO and USAID between agreement documents these review must Team Evaluation The .etc ,achieved results the stating reports performance team initial the for preparation in others and Salvador El/USAID by provided literature existing other and is Team Evaluation The .interviews for stakeholders local with meeting before and meetings planning to Matrix Review a create and ,research literature contextual own their make ,these review to expected should Matrix Review The .Report Evaluation final the of part as Salvador El/USAID to delivered be to linked is methodologies other and documents reviewed from extracted information key how indicate .question evaluation each 41 Performance the to relevant documents following the review shall Team Evaluation the ,minimum a At :Team Evaluation the to documents these provide will Salvador El/USAID .Evaluation 2025 - 2020 Strategy Cooperation Development Country Salvador El/USAID● (applicable if (amendments its and agreement Cooperative● Plan Learning and ,Evaluation ,Monitoring● plans work Annual● reports Annual and Quarterly● Strategy Outrage and Communication● papers and studies Technical● reforms electoral of Proposals● training other and Policies Public and Government in Course Certificate the of Curriculum● courses Agendas Citizen● Assessment Youth Salvador El/USAID● analysis Supplementary its and Analysis Development Inclusive and Gender Salvador El/USAID● data context and performance of Review data contains that Plan Learning and ,Evaluation ,Monitoring specific-activity an has FUNDAUNGO Team Evaluation The .implementation activity during indicators performance of number a on collected in it on report should and analysis data the of part as indicators performance on data monitoring use will quality data relevant satisfies and above stated questions evaluation the to relates it as Report Final the .standards the answering when possible extent maximum the to included and analyzed be should data Context in found be can democracy and elections to related indicators context of Examples .questions evaluation (Dem-V (Democracy of Varieties ,Project Opinion Public American Latin the by Barometer Americas the .sources other and ,Institute discussions group focus ,surveys ,interviews informant Key ,interviews group ,interviews informant key through ,stakeholders interview will Team Evaluation The in women and men both include will Team Evaluation The .discussions groups focus or/and ,surveys short key provide will FUNDAUNGO or Salvador El/USAID .processes consultation’ stakeholders the .begins evaluation the once information contact informant :from information collect will Team Evaluation the ,minimum At DGS ,Representative s’Officer Agreement former and Current (staff Salvador El/USAID Key● (Management DGS ,RPO in Backstops staff FUNDAUNGO● (NDI ,FLACSO ,UDB ,UCA (partners s’FUNDAUNGO of Representatives● Policies Public and Government in Course Certificate the of Graduates● CSOs beneficiary of Representatives● Tribunal Electoral Supreme the of) s(Representative● parties political of) s(Representatives● Reforms Electoral for Commission Legislative the of) s(Member/)s(Representative● similar with involved needed as stakeholders other interview to encouraged is Team Evaluation The USAID into insight an provide can that actors other and) donors international other including (projects .impacts programmatic 42 of combination a or ,random ,purposeful as such; process selection the describing plan sampling A group focus and ,surveys ,interviews informant key for stakeholders and organizations for 30;approaches .Report Final and Plan Evaluation the in included be must discussions observation Direct ,applicable if ,select will Team Evaluation the ,FUNDAUNGO and Salvador El/USAID with consultation In developed plan sampling the on based be should Selection .observation direct for opportunities relevant .Report Final the in included and Plan Evaluation the for the during activity the by or hosted events at observation direct conduct may Team Evaluation The stakeholders with talk to events these use can Team Evaluation The .evaluation the of period fieldwork evaluation the answer to evidence as data additional collect and ,interviews conduct ,beneficiaries and events of list a with Team Evaluation the provide will FUNDAUNGO and Salvador El/USAID .questions .appropriate if ,begins evaluation the once meetings planning Team the and Salvador El/USAID between virtually held be will meeting off kick/planning-team initial An the of submission the before Team Evaluation the and FUNDAUNGO between and Team Evaluation ,Team Evaluation the from questions any clarify can Salvador El/USAID that so Plan Evaluation :to are meeting this of results expected The .guidelines and ,expectations responsibilities and role s'member team each Clarify● deliverables and timeline anticipated the Confirm● the in presented be to question evaluation by methodologies and tools collection data Discuss● Plan Evaluation and ,Salvador El/USAID ,Team Evaluation the how and logistics communications Identify● other each with communicate will FUNDAUNGO .Team Evaluation the or/and Salvador El/USAID by necessary deemed as held be may meetings Additional Deliverables .E 100) evaluation the of date starting the from services of days working 70 than more no that estimated is It During .SOW this under required as evaluation quality-high a complete to required be will) days calendar :deliverables following the submit shall team evaluation the ,frame time that Team Evaluation the by completed be to 12, size 31font Sans Gill Word in ,Plan Evaluation An 1. the of day starting the after days calendar 15 than later no ,Meetings Planning Team the after provide to it review and mail electronic via Plan Evaluation the receive will USAID .evaluation Plan Evaluation The .document the receiving after days working) 5 (five than later no comments must It .undertaken be will activities and ,tasks ,deliverables various the how of details provide will :least at include ;description Activity● the is proposed designs of mix or design one why of explanation the and ,32design Evaluation● ;addressed be will limitations these how and ,limitations its ,appropriate most case typical ,sampling theoretical ,sampling convenience ,sampling proximity ,sampling quota include approaches sampling Some 30 .etc ,sampling USAID the per as font approved other any use must they ,available family Sans Gill have not does Team Evaluation the If 31 .Guide Branding-Co Partners and Manual Graphics .etc ,design panel ,design study case ,design series time ,design after￾and-before ,design sectorial-cross ,design snapshot include evaluations performance for designs evaluation of examples Some 32 43 :question evaluation each per information following the summarizing matrix A● of mix or method one why of explanation the ,source data ,collection data for) s(Method o ;them address to ways the and limitations its ,appropriate most the is methods of mix or technique analysis one why of explanation the ,6analysis data for) s(Technique o .them address to ways the and limitations its ,appropriate most the is techniques live or notes interview ,example for (data of capture the describing Plan Management Data● to as manner a such in handled be will data all how and ,transfer and storage ,)recording could comments are there where situations any in informants of identities the protect .security or employment their on impact negative a have potentially and collection data for time starting tentative including ,Plan Milestone or/and Timeline● ;evaluation the under conducted activity each of duration ,(s(guide moderator group focus or questionnaires as such ,protocols collection data of Drafts● ;.etc ,33form consent ,scripts interview ;responsibilities and ,roles ,composition Team Evaluation● applicable if ,plan visit Site and evaluation the for Location● the ,discussions group focus or/and ,surveys ,interviews informant key includes Plan Evaluation the If :information following the include should Plan Evaluation questions evaluation the answer to help will surveys/interviews the How 1. ?so do to qualified are they why and surveys/interviews the conduct will Who 2. the of location and ,timing ,number the deciding for are methods and rationale the What 3. surveys/interviews recruited and selected be will participants the How 4. recorded be will surveys/interviews the How 5. presented and analyzed be will data survey/interview the How 6. focus and interview as well as ,protocols analysis and collection data the particularly ,Plan Evaluation The All .work field the and collection data of start the to prior USAID by approved be must ,guides group five another have will Team Evaluation The .Spanish and English in submitted be must protocols interview will Team Evaluation the ,approved is Plan Evaluation the Once .changes any make to days working) 5( be must Plan Evaluation the to change subsequent Any .PDF in copy electronic an USAID to submit .USAID by approved the on briefing preliminary a with Partner Implementing the and USAID provide may Team Evaluation The .collection data of beginning the to prior Plan Evaluation by evaluation this of manager the to submitted activities of reports bullet weekly Brief 1. .business of close the by Monday every due mail electronic that stakeholders other and ,FUNDAUNGO ,USAID for Briefing Findings Preliminary A 2. Evaluation the by identified findings preliminary the on necessary consider Salvador El/USAID .report draft the starting before and phase collection data the finalizing after immediately Team ,analysis content ,synthesis data ,multilevel ,sequential ,conversion ,parallel include techniques analysis data of examples Some 6 .etc ,analysis contribution make must Team Evaluation the ,evaluation performance this in participate will) old years 18 than less (persons underage If 33 .Protection Child to related regulations national all with comply to sure 44 briefing the If .Spanish or English in conducted be may briefing the ,audience the to According .present be to need would members Team local and Leader Team the only ,person-in held were Briefing Findings Preliminary The .attend should team whole the ,virtually held were briefing the If Final the of Draft the prepare to exercise feedback a as Team Evaluation the by used be will .Report other and ,FUNDAUNGO ,Salvador El/USAID from inputs get to is) s(workshop creation￾co the of idea The .evaluation the of recommendations the draft to) s(workshop creation-Co 3. and findings the on based ,activities election future improve can Mission the how on stakeholders the as well as needed workshops of number the define will Team Evaluation The .conclusions the at conditions sanitary national the on Depending .last will workshops the hours of number to responsible be will Team Evaluation The .virtual or person-in be can) s(workshop the ,moment .recommendations practical draft later no due review for submitted 12, size font Sans Gill ,Word in Report Final the of Draft A 4. Program The .mail electronic via Plan Evaluation the of approval the after days calendar 35 than with process review-peer the coordinating for responsible be will Salvador El/USAID in Office the to it distributing for and Washington/USAID and Salvador El/USAID within offices different consolidate will Salvador El/USAID .comments for stakeholders other and partner implementing a At .days working 10 within Team Evaluation the to back draft the send and comments all and Report Final the 201, ADS and Policy Evaluation USAID the with accordance in and ,minimum :sections following the include must versions draft its ,conclusions ,findings ,questions evaluation ,background ,purpose the of Summary Executive● ;(pages five than more no (recommendations and ;questions and purpose Evaluation● emphasis with ,34limitations/challenge any and design evaluation the of description Thorough● ;analysis data and collection data for methods and timeliness the on ;tables analysis data Relevant● 35;findings the of analysis the from drawn conclusions and Findings● the for responsibility defined with recommendations specific and ,practical ,oriented-Action● ;action the of users intended to recommendations and ,conclusions ,findings of plan dissemination A● ;and ,evaluation :Appendices● USAID by approved changes any with annotated ,SOW Original o interest-of-conflict with ,roles and composition team collection data and Evaluation o necessary if ,interest of conflicts perceived or real all for disclosures checklists and questionnaires including instruments and protocols collection Data o consulted documents of matrix Review o notes Meeting o any affect limitations the whether/how) b (and ,limitations mitigate to taken steps) a (identify must Team Evaluation The 34 .recommendations or ,conclusions ,finding particular techniques different through synthesized are findings how to as clear be must analysis the ,conclusions to findings from moving In 35 .etc; weighting; propensity; amalgamation and ,convergence ,divergence as such 45 interviews and ,meetings ,activities evaluation of schedule Complete o visited sites and ,contacted organizations and individuals of List o maps ,visits site during taken pictures ,graphs ,Tables o El/USAID .Team Evaluation the from Report Draft quality-high a receive to expects Salvador El/USAID the using Report Draft the of quality the assess will Salvador .Template Review and Report Evaluation the excluding ,body its in pages 40 than longer no 12, size Sans Gill font ,PDF in Report Final 1. .Appendices and; Acronyms of List; Contents of Table; page cover Ensure to Criteria 201, ADS and Policy Evaluation s’USAID to adhere must Report Final approved The incorporated have and Spanish and English in submitted be must and ,36Report Evaluation the of Quality the days working 10 Salvador El/USAID to due be will Report Final The .appropriate as ,comments s'USAID the after days calendar 90 than later no and draft the on comments receives Team Evaluation the after Report Final the of Spanish and English in copies bound ,printed quality-high Three .evaluation the of start .Report Final the of acceptance of days calendar 10 within Salvador El/USAID to submitted be must .sides both on printed be must Reports and ,conclusions ,findings ,purpose evaluation the of summary Page-One A 1. .PDF in Spanish and English in prepared be will summary Page-One The .recommendations ,drive flash or DVD (form electronic in collected) quantitative or qualitative (data raw Any 2. starting the after days calendar 100 than later no due is) .etc ,Excel ,Word of format original in Development the to submit must Team Evaluation the 540, ADS per As .evaluation the of date ,datasets any of copy a ,format proprietary-non ,readable-machine a in ,)DDL (Library Data an produce to) quality sufficient of or (used are that ,metadata and codebooks their and .Work Intellectual El/USAID by to agreed and Meeting Team the during identified as deliverables Other 3. .Team Evaluation the and Salvador .Salvador El/USAID by approved are they until versions draft considered be will papers and reports All .watermark in” DRAFT “word the with labeled be must documents draft These and ,data and evidence quantitative and qualitative strong ,facts analyzed as presented be must Findings ,findings unbiased ensure To .opinion s’people of compilation the or hearsay ,anecdotes on based not will Team Evaluation The .suggestions USAID on based modified be will findings that guarantee no is there ,findings the in incorporated is it before suggestion any objective as corroborate and ,investigate ,research .change the of record a have to as so document draft the in noted be will change the and organized-well and ,researched-well ,thoughtful be must presentations and reports submitted All Evaluation the ,report the writing When .questions evaluation the answer objectively and ,documents and understand to easy be should writing of style The .audiences different the remember must Team driven-data and accurate with issues and questions evaluation the address to sure making while ,concise list clearly should Team Evaluation The .37recommendations practical and conclusions justifiable ,findings ,bias recall ,bias selection (analysis and collection data both during exist that limitations or biases any of conflicts possible or real all ,addition In .).etc ,groups comparator between differences unobservable .writing in Team Evaluation the of member each by disclosed be must interest pdf.maa/1870/201documents/files/default/sites/gov.usaid.www://https at available ,maa201 reference mandatory ADS See 36 :Note To-How s’USAID the see ,Reports Evaluation of quality the ensure to criteria the on information additional For 37 Policy Evaluation USAID the of 1 Annex and ,”Reports Evaluation Preparing“ 46 or context the give always must Team Evaluation the ,report any in individual an quoting When rewording not but ,valid be may quote the in error grammatical a Correcting .quote the of circumstances do should Team Evaluation the ,another to language one from quotes translating When .phrase entire an to equivalent is translation the of tone the that ensure to taken be must care and way idiomatic an in so .texts report in language original their in presented be should Quotes .original the of tone the .Guide Format and Style ADS the and Manual Standards Graphic USAID the with comply must reports All submit and compliant it make will Team Evaluation the ,USAID by approved been has Report Final a Once USAID email will Team Evaluation The .38)DEC (Clearinghouse Experience Development s’USAID to it any to Annex an as Differences of Statement a attach may USAID .reports evaluation the for link DEC the .version final the in remain differences any if Report Final Management Evaluation .F Team Evaluation local or/and ,regional ,international multidisciplinary of combination a use will evaluation performance This :positions three following the minimum a at include must Team Evaluation The .experts Leader Team Evaluation Qualifications Minimum International ,Administration Public ,Sciences Political as such fields in degree s’Master :Education doctorate or .D.Ph .required is development international to related fields other or ,Economics ,Relations .plus a is candidacy Doctoral with professional or degree .plus a is evaluation and monitoring in training Formal IV Level Spanish and IV Level English American :Proficiency Language external rigorous conducting experience prior relevant of years eight least At :Experience Work monitoring and objectives development for methods qualitative and quantitative both using evaluations of understanding detailed and Knowledge .America Latin in preferably ,overseas programs and projects environment development its and characteristics political and ,cultural ,social ,economic s’America Central management project of years eight least At .plus a is America Central in experience Working .necessary is .plus a is teams multidisciplinary of management with Experience .required is development in experience they as particularly ,policies and ,operations ,approaches ,objectives Government .S.U with Familiarity .plus a is evaluations to relate related activities all coordinating and overseeing for responsible be will Leader Team Evaluation The :Role in deliverables quality of completion and production the ensuring for and evaluation performance this to .SOW this with conformance in ,manner professional a Specialist Governance and Democracy Qualifications Minimum related fields other or ,Policy Public ,Sciences Political ,Laws as such fields in degree s’Master :Education is candidacy Doctoral with professional or degree doctorate or .D.Ph .required is processes electoral to culture political of knowledge Demonstrated .plus a is evaluation and monitoring in training Formal .plus a .necessary is .IV Level Spanish and III Level English American :Proficiency Language by funded or produced materials projects assistance development and documents 540, System Directives Automated Per 38 .DEC the in inclusion for submitted be must USAID 47 experience level-professional ,responsible progressively of years five least At :Experience Work and ,studies communications political and culture political ,assessments capacity organizational conducting of application the with Experience .evaluation performance this to related studies similar other ,approaches ,objectives s’USAID with Familiarity .preferred is research science social for methodologies is America Central in experience Work .plus a is evaluations to relate they as particularly ,operations and .preferred Specialist Inclusion Social and Gender Qualifications Minimum ,Sciences Social ,Works Social ,Psychology ,Sociology as such fields in degree s’Master :Education doctorate or .D.Ph .required is analysis inclusion social and gender to related fields other or ,Economy is evaluation and monitoring in training Formal .plus a is candidacy Doctoral with professional or degree .necessary is culture political of knowledge Demonstrated .plus a .IV Level Spanish and III Level English American :Proficiency Language experience level-professional ,responsible progressively of years five least At :Experience Work .populations vulnerable other and ,disabilities with people ,gender ,youth on focused analyses conducting with Familiarity .preferred is research science social for methodologies of application the with Experience ,Policy Evaluation USAID to relate they as particularly ,operations and ,approaches ,objectives s’USAID Central in experience Work .plus a is Policy Development in Youth USAID and ,Policy Gender USAID .preferred is America evaluating and ,monitoring ,designing in experience considerable have should Team Evaluation The excellent have and Suite Office MS in proficiency have must They .programs assistance development and clearly write and conceptualize to ability the and skills presentation oral and ,proofreading ,written a with ,necessary is context American Latin the of Understanding .details to attention and concisely personnel key one least At .America Central in specifically experience work with personnel for preference producing and ,data quantitative analyzing ,data qualitative transforming in experience have must member .format digestible easily an in visualization data any indicating statement signed a USAID to advance in provide to required be will members Team All members Team Evaluation No .USAID to external someone be must Leader Team The .interest of conflict been has who Anyone .stage any in activity the of implementation the in involved directly been have shall not must years five last the in partners its or ,FUNDAUNGO ,Salvador El/USAID by employed directly .Team Evaluation the of part as considered be Logistics not may pandemic -19COVID the to due conditions sanitary the ,SOW this preparing of moment the At Salvador El/USAID and ,improve conditions If .person-in data collect or travel to Team Evaluation the allow support logistics all for responsible be will Team Evaluation the then ,allowed is travelling that considers required with (arrangements travel all ,administration office field including ,SOW this under necessary with coordination ,scheduling appointment and facilitation planning team ,)clearances Salvador El/USAID ,(copying and printing ,support computer (services administrative ,involved stakeholders and partners all .SOW this in forth set provisions with complying for and ,dissemination and editing report 48 VERSION ENGLISH PROTOCOLS :II ANNEX Component Type Informant Questions-Sub Question Evaluation 1 Question the been have What 1. 1:Q intended significant most results unintended and terms in USAID by achieved ,monitoring election) a of to used was assessment/diagnosis What :CSOs electoral for on design project the base What? processes observation and monitoring electoral the in priori a identify you did problems a identify you did challenges What? process the of capacities the to respect with priori ?observers electoral were think you do capacities of types What your with organization your in strengthened When? (activities project the in participation possible be will it ,documents project reviewing project the that capacities the into delve to .(strengthen to intended and leaders CSO members CSO individual .monitoring electoral in 2C electoral that consider you Do :CSOs strengthen to possible it made has monitoring on based proposals with process electoral the ?collected evidence the Electoral ,TSE ,CSOs Council Reform 2C to opportunity the that consider you Do has process electoral the for proposals formulate advocacy and research your strengthened you would What? aspects what In? capacities of type this for support about recommend ?future the in activity the in staff Research .association academic and staff FUNDAUNGO for advocated that CSOs .proposals the identifying in contributions main the are What the of weaknesses and strengths principal the ?cycle 2019 - 2018 the in held elections 2C 2C survey ,All proposals and reports the have receptivity What ?authorities electoral the among had have who TSE the in participated recipients and activities .proposals the of 2C the been have What 1. 1:Q intended significant most results unintended and terms in USAID by achieved culture political) b of ,understanding the of knowledge better that consider you Do policies public of cycle the and process electoral electoral the during them influence to how and in citizens of interest the increases process 39?activities these in participating of participants Youth 4.C 1,C activities 3C the of Participants .Diploma :PP 2,C :Electoral 4C3,C1,C young motivate activities these that think you Do ?vote and out go to more people of participants Youth 4.C 1,C activities 3C the of Participants .Diploma :PP 2,C :Electoral 4C3,C1,C electoral the of knowledge that consider you Do improves policies public of cycle the and process electoral influencing successfully of possibility the most the from proposals with processes ?groups population vulnerable and groups Vulnerable .people young 4C3,C1,C young motivate activities these that think you Do ?Why ? more vote and out go to people and groups Vulnerable .people young 4C3,C1,C compare and studies s’FUNDAUNGO in evidence the examine can team the ,evaluation the for out carried be to analysis the In 39 interest the in change of perception with it contrast to Report Development Human UNDP 2019 the of findings the with data the .vote and out go to motivation or 49 field the in observe you did developments What actors other and voters ,JRVs the of members in ?2018 to prior processes electoral to relation in of terms in attitudes different observe you Did ,disrespect or respect ,apathy ,participation ,hatred of expressions ,intolerance or tolerance ?others among to and leaders CSO members CSO individual .monitoring electoral in 2C relation in changed perceptions your have How and processes electoral in involvement your to the in participated having after ,policy public ?program 3C 3C in Youth the been have What 1. 1:Q intended significant most results unintended and terms in USAID by achieved public participatory) c of processes policy adopted been proposals policy public the Have they have far How? agenda presidential the on ?advanced that informants ,GOES them received 4C followed they that process work the was What ?proposals policy public the formulate to 4C Consortium Academic to out carried were actions advocacy What policy public of presentation the accompany ?agenda presidential the for proposals 4C Consortium Academic proposals agenda policy public municipal The which in ,degree what to and adopted were ?municipalities in elected Candidates 20 the in 2018 who ,municipalities proposals the received .activities project during 1C who leaders / CSOs did ,elections 2021 the In the to agendas policy public present trained were ?parties political of candidates the in participants 1-C building-capacity the in activities municipalities 1C agendas formulate to how of knowledge the Has by them present to how and ,interest citizen of to you motivated ,governments municipal elected electoral municipal the in involved more become ?How? process -1C the in Participants 20 the in course .municipalities 1C by achieved was participation much How What? activities training in officials municipal to officials municipal influence factors policy public local in demands citizen incorporate ?initiatives -1C the in Participants 20 the in course Municipal .municipalities youth and functionaries .participated that .Inf ,FU MELP (1C 3.Y motivated has knowledge this that think you Do in involved get To? vote to out go to more you .process electoral the of aspect other some ?(Which in participants Youth 4.C 1,C of activities the in Participants 3.C of course Diploma 4C 3,C1,C to opportunity the that consider you Do agenda presidential the for proposals formulate advocacy and research your strengthened has you would What? aspects what In? capacities of type this for support about recommend ?future the in research the in staff Research .association academic and staff FUNDAUNGO for advocated that CSOs .proposals the 4C 2,C studies of presentation the for events the Do process electoral the improve to proposals and ?why ,No or Yes? population target the reach the in staff Research .association academic and staff FUNDAUNGO for advocated that CSOs .proposals the 3Y INF UNGO￾FUNDA 2C the about highlight you do lessons What presidential the of teams the to approach the in staff Research ,associations academic 4C 2,C 50 you can and know not you did What? formulas the on impact the improve to future the in apply ?policies public of design and staff FUNDAUNGO for advocated that CSOs .proposals the the been have What 1. 1:Q intended significant most results unintended and terms in USAID by achieved ?education youth) d of have you which in activities the all Of think you do which ,project the in participated more become to people young other help would electoral the in participating in interested ?vote to out going in and process in participants Youth 4.C 1,C of activities the in Participants 3.C of course Diploma 4C3,C1,C ?participated you have activities project which In the with satisfaction of level your indicate Please Likert (activity each in obtained you learning .(satisfaction of levels for Scale ,participants All Youth by disaggregating( groups vulnerable / sex / of ,)municipality / 4.C 1,C activities 3C the of Participants .Diploma 4C3,C1,C have you which in activities the of Which to extended be should think you do participated citizen their strengthen to people young other ?participation ,participants All Youth by disaggregating( groups vulnerable / sex / of ,)municipality / 4.C 1,C activities 3C the of Participants .Diploma 4C3,C1,C citizen in leaders CSO of training the Does enough provide policies public local on advocacy public local analyze to participants for elements ?problems ,participants All Youth by disaggregating( groups vulnerable / sex / of ,)municipality / 4.C 1,C activities 3C the of Participants .Diploma .Inf ,FU MELP (1C 3.Y of management the in participants train you Do your in partners other include to strategies that so capacities build it Does? proposal participatory a in agendas build can participants ?way ,participants All Youth by disaggregating( groups vulnerable / sex / of ,)municipality / 4.C 1,C activities 3C the of Participants .Diploma .Inf ,FU MELP (1C 3.Y 2 Question the has extent what To 2.Q the influenced activity policy and reform electoral ?agenda encourage proposed reforms electoral the Will particularly ,population the by voting increased ?youth ,Review Document Reform Electoral KII .TSE ,Commission -2C OSC 2C encourage proposed reforms electoral the Will the by politics electoral in participation increased ?youth particularly ,population ,Review Document Reform Electoral KII .TSE ,Commission -2C OSC 2C reform electoral the to happened has What Did? FUNDAUNGO by presented proposals of Commission Reform Electoral the reach they your been has What? Assembly Legislative the since them to happened has what And? reception with done be can work additional What? then ?future the in actors other and them of novelties or contributions main the are What they do way what In? proposals proposed the ?system electoral the strengthen to help Reform Electoral ,TSE of staff ,Commission ,UCA ,FUNDAUNGO UDB ,FLACSO 2C 51 proposed the can challenges and obstacles What ?face proposals reform electoral temporary) 2 (,abroad Voting) 1( electoral) 4 (democracy party internal) 3 (bodies .women of participation political) 5 (financing in participated that CSOs the were How to advocacy in involved monitoring electoral ?proposals electoral present - OLS; 2C of OSC -KII 2C 2C electoral the from data the was How the of context the in generated observations the of content the in account into taken project ?presented proposals electoral FUNDAUNGO who researchers the formulated 4C 1,C ,proposals 4C1,C municipality the for agenda citizen proposed The What? How? useful they were ,received you that be process that can How? them with do they did ?better done people -3,C 4,C 1,C to elected were who ,councils municipal the in participated received and activities .proposals 4C3,C1,C to respond to difficult it make factors What take you when received proposals agenda citizen ?elected were you which for office the people -3,C 4,C 1,C to elected were who ,councils municipal the in participated received and activities .proposals 4C3,C1,C the did extent what To 2.1 communication s'activity strategy outreach and the influencing to contribute policy and reform electoral ?agenda dissemination and communication the was What ?component by ,activity the of strategy ,review Document of COP and DCOP 4C 1,C ,Fundaungo 4C3,C2,C1,C approaching of way this that consider you Do any had has policies public and reforms electoral ?them on influence of COP and DCOP ,FUNDAUNGO academic ,staff research leaders consortium 4C3,C2,C1,C influence this consider you do degree what To ?been have to of COP and DCOP ,FUNDAUNGO academic ,staff research leaders consortium 4C3,C2,C1,C most been has strategy the of aspect What electoral or / and PP influencing in successful ?reform of COP and DCOP ,FUNDAUNGO academic ,staff research leaders consortium 4C3,C2,C1,C 3 Question has extent what To 3.Q capacities developed USAID better to CSOs of culture political understand electoral monitor and ?processes project the in participating before ,you For the about understand you did what ,activities the in culture political the and process electoral ?country 4C3,C2,C1,C OLS is what ,activities the in participating after And you do what And? process electoral the ?culture political by now understand 4C3,C2,C1,C OLS ,in participated have you activities the Among strengthen to useful most been have ones which more participate to capacities personal your 4C3,C2,C1,C OLS 52 of list? (process electoral the in effectively (4c 3,c 2,c 1,c of activities discard you would analysis of elements What following the by presented results the from vote to intention the of Analysis :)s (document in adults and Youth ,panel electoral an through reform electoral ,legislative ,elections of face the in findings groundbreaking What? .etc ,proposals ?highlight you would terms electoral and political is think you that hypothesis particular a there Is ,people young to relation in And? confirmed ?populations vulnerable ,women in Participants and events dissemination the of recipients analysis results electoral panel ,documents of analysis and surveys system electoral the 4C3,C2,C1,C have activities what ,estimation your In designated that organization the strengthened in intervene can it that so ,participant a as you ?monitoring do and process electoral the 2C OLS have activities what ,estimation your In designated that organization the strengthened in intervene can it that so ,participant a as you ?monitoring do and process electoral the that CSOs from People -2C participated 2C of result a as better do to you allow it will What your To? you To? strengthening that ?organization that CSOs from People -2C participated 2C 4 Question recipients do How 4.Q the of makers-decision and the where institutions the value work recipients Public and Government for Program Policy ?Leaders Emergent of usefulness the value you do degree what To Public and Government the of Diploma the Richter (leaders emerging for Program Policy your of members or / and you which ,)scale ?took organization 3C -3C OLS and government the in acquired knowledge The by ,leaders emerging for program policy public ways what in ,organization your of members your of work the to useful been they have ?organization society Civil 3-C KII institutions and leaders staff designated that other and participants participants 3C been has provided content the of aspects What ?organization your of work the to relevant most society Civil 3-C KII institutions and leaders staff designated that other and participants participants 3C your in work of areas new been there Have knowledge the of result a as ,organization ?Program the from obtained society Civil 3-C KII institutions and leaders staff designated that other and participants participants 3C ?continue should Program the think you Do ?Why society Civil 3-C KII institutions and leaders staff designated that other and participants participants 3C be program the of content the could How ?it strengthen to evolved or improved society Civil 3-C KII institutions and leaders staff designated that 3C 53 other and participants participants the are What 4.1 that barriers and hindrances applying in face recipients gained knowledge new the Government the through Program Policy Public and ?Leader Emergent for satisfaction of level the is what ,estimate your In Government the of content the with feel you ?Leaders Emerging for Program Policy Public and ?Why .)presented scale Likert( group focus a and ,OLS women of sample a with different the of men and who leadership of types mostly ,participated have .people young 4.C3.C2.C1.C most been have to consider you do issues What main the list? (leadership political your in useful (curriculum the from topics group focus a and ,OLS women of sample a with different the of men and who leadership of types mostly ,participated have .people young 4.C3.C2.C1.C to suggest you do improvements What useful more it make and program the strengthen ?leaders emerging to group focus a and ,OLS women of sample a with different the of men and who leadership of types mostly ,participated have .people young 4.C3.C2.C1.C knowledge new the apply to able been you Have ?when How? Program the in acquired group focus a and ,OLS women of sample a with different the of men and who leadership of types mostly ,participated have .people young 4.C3.C2.C1.C from you prevent that barriers felt you Have Which? acquired knowledge new the applying .describe ,ones group focus a and ,OLS women of sample a with different the of men and who leadership of types mostly ,participated have .people young 4.C3.C2.C1.C be can barriers these think you do How ?overcome group focus a and ,OLS women of sample a with different the of men and who leadership of types mostly ,participated have .people young 4.C3.C2.C1.C be could challenges these that consider you Do help to Program the of content the in included be could it think you do How? them overcome ?done group focus a and ,OLS women of sample a with different the of men and who leadership of types mostly ,participated have .people young 4.C3.C2.C1.C 54 INTERVIEWED INFORMANTS KEY OF LIST :III ANNEX Time and Date Position Person Organization Opinion Public ,Coordinator Delgado Manuel FUNDAUNGO Studies am11:00 - 2021 April 12 Public ,Coordinator Ex Argueta Carlos FUNDAUNGO Studies Opinion pm4:15: - 2021 April 12 Component Coordinator Urquilla Eduardo FUNDAUNGO ,Monitoring Electoral 2.C FUNDAUNGO am10:00 2021- April 14 Social of Director Ex Morales Oscar FUNDAUNGO (3 Component (Dialogue Policies Public of Director Ex (4 Component( pm4:00 2021- April 14 ,Monitoring ,Coordinator Zepeda Katia FUNDAUNGO Learning & Evaluation am11:30 - 2021 April 15 1,C component Coordinator Rodríguez Mauricio Carlos FUNDAUNGO FUNDAUNGO pm2:00 - 2021 April 15 am11:00 2021- April 19 Congress of Member Cuadra Portillo René Arena pm2:00 2021- April 19 Director Escobar Eduardo Ciudadana Acción pm-4:00 2021 April 19 Magistrate Ex Cardoza Miguel TSE am8:.00 - 2021 April 20 Salvador El in Representative Molina Rafael NDI am8:.00 - 2021 April 20 Director Meléndez Juan NIMD am10:30 - 2021 April 20 Coordinator Rivera Laura/Cuellar Eduardo PNUD pm2:30 - 2021 April 20 defined Not Monterrosa Carlos UCA am8:00 - 2021 April 21 Director Sub Lupu Noam Vandelrvilt LAPOP pm2:30 - 2021 April 21 Director Resident Núñez Eduardo NDI pm2:30 - 2021 April 21 Officer Program Palma Diego IRI am8:00 - 2021 April 21 Congress of Member Belloso Anabel FMLN pm2:00 - 2021 April 22 Director Baños Saul FESPAD am8:00 - 2021 April 23 Officer Program Solano Luisa NDI Mora Roberto ,García Meléndez Atilio Rubén TSE Daboub Carlos Juan ,Ruiz am10:30 - 2021 April 23 Magistrates Agendas Citizen Citizen on Course( Public for Lobbying Local at Policies (Level Community LGTBI - Guzmán Camilo of Association s´Women - Munguía Margarita AMUDECUS Cuscatancingo del ,Forum Health - Montano Carmen del Alicia the & Zaragoza of Committee Oversight Social Protection Civil for Commission Community on Course (Agendas Citizen Public for Lobbying Citizen (Level Local at Policies am9:00 - 2021 April 26 Agendas Citizen Citizen on Course( Public for Lobbying Local at Policies (Level Community Julia Santa García Matilde ADERTUSA of & Association Development on Course (Agendas Citizen Public for Lobbying Citizen (Level Local at Policies am10:00 - 2021 April 26 and Government 3. Diploma Policy Public Course Strategy :Magazine – Alfaro Guadalupe Wendy Business and and Youth - Cortez Ramirez Adrián Víctor Salvador El of Association Students Cristosal - Acosta Montano Manuel Carlos Articulation and Coordination (Foundation (Facilitator Public and Government Course Diploma Policy am8:30 - 2021 April 27 of area the of Coordinator Rodríguez Rommel FUNDE and Macroeconomics am10:00 - 2021 April 27 55 ,professor /Development UCA am8:30 2021 28 April Historian Roberto Turcios El of Ambassador Ex Rivas Zamora Ruben the and India in Salvador USA am9:00 - 2021 April 29 Collective National Diversity Sexual FMLN Alejandra p/c) (era (Menjívar Manuel José transgénero - Guadrón Menjívar pm2:00 - 2021 April 29 Coordinator National for Department of Chief Cristancho Andrea UCA and Communications Culture pm4:00 - 2021 April 29 the of Coordinator Technical Peña Michelle Claudia Agendas Citizen (courses am9:00 - 2021 April 28 Fraction Legislative FMLN am10:00 - 2021 April 30 Advisor Tobar Serrano Alexander Shafik Citizen - Advisor Technical Rivas Ernesto Carlos FUNDAUNGO on Course (Agendas and policies public Municipal (participation citizen pm2:00 - 2021 April 30 of Municipality Ayutuxtepeque on Course (Agendas Citizen Reyes Mauricio René and policies public Municipal (participation citizen am9:00 2021 May 3 of Municipality/CSO Miguel San on Course (Agendas Citizen Pérez Villatoro Alexander and policies public Municipal (participation citizen am10:30 2021 May 3 the of Office ,Economist Rivera Elena María NATIONS UNITED Coordinator Resident am8.00 April de 27 Martes the of Presidency-Vice Republic am11.00 2021 April 29 Advisor Legal Muñoz Adolfo of Representation Luxembourg International Cooperation am8.30 2021 April 27 Coordinator Pigot Denis am10.00 2021 April 27 Specialist Policies Social Vásquez Jimmy UNICEF am8:00 2021 May 11 AOR Miranda Guillermo USAID ,Projection Social dean-Vice Serrano Omar UCA .UCA am10:00 2021 May 11 pm4:00 - 2021 May 11 Party of Chief Córdova Ricardo FUNDAUNGO am9:00 - 2021 May 12 Party of Chief Deputy Quiñónez Leslie FUNDAUNGO 2021 May 13 Director Programs Master Orellana Iván Carlos UDB 56 BIBLIOGRAPHY :IV ANNEX Bibliography las en electoral comportamiento del Análisis 2019. .FUNDAUNGO-Ungo Manuel Guillermo .Dr Fundación 2020. de Noviembre 04-2020. Técnico Estudio 2009-2018. municipales elecciones .ND .Salvador El ,Salvador San .Strategy Branding 2018. de Noviembre .Exterior el desde Voto 1. .No Informativo Boletín 2018. de Diciembre .DS y ,PDC ,PCN ,ARENA :Coalición de Pacto 2. .No Informativo Boletín 2018. de Diciembre .Candidaturas de Inscripción 3. .No Informativo Boletín 2020. de Noviembre 202. electoral proceso del preparatorias Condiciones .1:No Electoral Monitoreo de Boletín 2020. de Noviembre 2021. Coalición de Pactos .2:No Electoral Monitoreo de Boletín 2020 de Diciembre 2021. Electoral Registro .3:No Electoral Monitoreo de Boletín 2021. de Enero 2021. electoral proceso el para candidaturas de Inscripción .4:No Electoral Monitoreo de Boletín 2017. de Septiembre .Modificaciones y Cooperación de Convenio 2019. de Junio 2018-2021. Municipal Directorio 2019. de Abril .Social Protección :Pública Política de Propuesta de Documento 2019. de Abril .Social Protección :Pública Política de Propuesta de Base Técnico Documento y Productiva Transformación la Impulsar para Estatales Capacidades :Pública Política de Propuesta de Documento 2019. de Abril .Territorial Económico Desarrollo el Transformación la Impulsar para Estatales Capacidades :Pública Política de Propuesta de Base Técnico Documento 2019. de Abril .Territorial Económico Desarrollo el y Productiva de Enero .Salvador El ,Salvador San 2019. de Enero .Social Seguridad :Pública Política de Propuesta de Documento 2019. 2019. de Enero .Social Seguridad :Pública Política de Propuesta de Base Técnico Documento 2019. de Enero .Educativo Entorno el en Violencia la de Prevención :Pública Política de Propuesta de Documento .Educativo Entorno el en Violencia la de Prevención :Pública Política de Propuesta de Base Técnico Documento 2019. de Enero 2019. de Enero .Violencia la de Comunitaria Prevención :Pública Política de Propuesta de Documento 2019. de Enero .Violencia la de Comunitaria Prevención :Pública Política de Propuesta de Base Técnico Documento del Concertación y Gobernanza de Territorial Marco :Pública Política de Propuesta de Base Técnico Documento 2019. de Febrero .Hídrico Recurso Recurso del Concertación y Gobernanza de Territorial Marco :Pública Política de Propuesta de Documento 2019 de Febrero .Hídrico 2019. de Marzo .Retorno y Migración :Pública Política de Propuesta de Documento 2019. de Marzo .Retorno y Migración :Pública Política de Propuesta de Base Técnico Documento 2018. de Abril 2018. Municipales y Legislativas Elecciones .Electoral Observación de Final Informe 2019 de Abril 2019. Presidenciales Elecciones .Electoral Observación de Final Informe 2020. de Noviembre 2021. elecciones las sobre básica Información 2018 marzo 2017- octubre Semestral Informe 2018 junio-abril Trimestral Informe 2018 septiembre 2017- octubre 1 año Anual Informe 2018 diciembre-octubre Trimestral Informe 2019 marzo-enero Trimestral Informe 2019 junio-abril Trimestral Informe 2019 septiembre - 2018 octubre 2 año Anual Informe 2019 diciembre-octubre Trimestral Informe 2020 septiembre - 2019 octubre 3 año Anual Informe Julio 02-2020. Trabajo de Documento 2018. de municipales y legislativas elecciones las a frente adultos y Jóvenes 2020. de 02-2019. Técnico Estudio .electorales resultados los de Análisis 2018: de municipales y legislativas elecciones Las 2019. de Agosto de Agosto 03-2019. Técnico Estudio .electorales resultados los de Análisis 2019: de presidenciales elecciones Las 2019. 57 Panel un mediante voto de intención la de Análisis 2019: presidenciales elecciones las en salvadoreña población La 2019. de Noviembre 01-2019. Trabajo de Documento .Electoral un mediante partidista identificación la de Análisis 2019: presidenciales elecciones las en salvadoreña población La 2020. de Noviembre 04-2020. Trabajo de Documento .Electoral Panel (2021 versión 2019, versión (Elecciones las para Supervisores y Observadores de Capacitación de Manual y legislativas elecciones para exterior el desde Voto .1.No electoral reforma de propuesta de Memorándum 2019. de Septiembre .Salvador El en municipales de Diciembre .Temporales Electorales Organismos Los .2.No electoral reforma de propuesta de Memorándum 2019. de Enero .políticos partidos los de interna Democracia .3.No electoral reforma de propuesta de Memorándum 2020. 2020. de Febrero .electoral Financiamiento .4.No electoral reforma de propuesta de Memorándum 2020. de Marzo .mujeres las de política Participación .5.No electoral reforma de propuesta de Memorándum 2018 septiembre - 2017 octubre 1 año Trabajo de Plan 2020 septiembre - 2019 octubre 3 año Trabajo de Plan 2021 junio - 2020 octubre 4 año Trabajo de Plan 2021 junio - 2020 octubre 4 año Trabajo de Plan .Aprendizaje y Evaluación ,Monitoreo de Plan 2019 septiembre - 2018 octubre 2 año Trabajo de Plan 2018. de Enero .)2017 diciembre – octubre (2018 Electoral Monitoreo de Reporte Primer 2019. de Enero .)2018 diciembre – octubre (2019 Electoral Monitoreo de Reporte Primer 2019. de Julio 01-2019. Técnico Estudio .)2010-2017 (Salvadoreño Electoral Sistema del Rediseño 2018. de Marzo .)2018 febrero – enero (2018 Electoral Monitoreo de Reporte Segundo consultoría de Informe .Públicas Políticas y Gobierno en Diplomado del Sistematización de Informe 2021. .Claudia ,Solís 2021. de marzo de 19 ,Salvador San .Ungo Manuel Guillermo .Dr Fundación la para elaborado USAID the of Evaluation Performance Final Salvador El/USAID 2021. .)SOW (Work of Statement .USAID .Salvador El ,Salvador San ,Mission USAID .Salvador El in Policy Public in Participation Citizen Promoting .Salvador El ,Salvador San ,Mission USAID .FUNDAUNGO -17-00004A519- AID Description Program .USAID 58 TEAM EVALUATION :V ANNEX and disclosure-non for agreements Their described briefly individuals three of composed was ET The .annex this in included are conflict and overseeing for responsible expert governance senior a is ,Leader Team the ,Jessup .S Francesca of completion and production the ensuring for and evaluation the to related activities all coordinating in participated She .SOW evaluation the with compliance in ,manner professional a in deliverables quality With .documents all of drafting and ,analysis and collection data ,methodology evaluation the of design citizen (1 Component on primarily focused she ,components principal four s’program the to respect .(Course Leadership Emerging (3 Component and ,)agendas work analytical extensive out carried has ,Specialist Governance and Democracy the ,Fontán Pablo Juan electoral comparative and historical of analysis qualitative and quantitative in ,reforms electoral on and coalitions of formation and platforms legislative including ,processes electoral on and ,behavior 4 Component and) proposals and reforms electoral (2 Component on focused While .candidacies ,fieldwork ,preparation ,design evaluation the of aspects all to contributed also he ,)Agenda Presidential( .expertise of sphere his within reporting and analysis data with expert development senior a is ,Specialist Inclusion Social and Gender the ,Sánchez Margarita of range wide a in inclusion and gender on studies qualitative and quantitative with experience extensive the of aspects to contributing as well as ,evaluation the of dimension this analyzed She .issues policy public .reporting and ,analysis data ,fieldwork ,preparation ,design evaluation 59 AGREEMENTS CONFLICTS AND DISCLOSURE-NON :VI ANNEX JESSUP FRANCESCA Name Promoting USAID the of Evaluation Performance Midterm Title Salvador El in Policy Public in Participation Citizen Initiative Learning and Evaluation ,Monitoring USAID Organization member Team Leader Team? Position Evaluation Number Award Evaluation (instrument other or contract( 16-00002TO-519-AID-15-00024/I-OAA-AID Evaluated) s(Project USAID implementer ,)s(name project Include( if ,)s(number award and) s(name (applicable Public in Participation Citizen Promoting USAID :Evaluated Project Salvador El in Policy of conflicts potential or real have I .disclose to interest No Yes disclose I ,above answered yes If :facts following the may interest of conflicts potential or Real :to limited not are but ,include an is who member family Close1. USAID the of employee the managing unit operating the or evaluated being) s(project (s(organization implementing being are) s(project whose .evaluated or ,direct is that interest Financial2. in ,indirect though significant is (s(organization implementing the being are projects whose of outcome the in or evaluated .evaluation the or direct previous or Current3. indirect though significant (s(project the with experience including ,evaluated being design project the in involvement the of iterations previous or .project work previous or Current4. seeking or experience USAID the with employment the managing unit operating implementing the or evaluation 60 (s(project whose) s(organization .evaluated being are work previous or Current5. organization an with experience industry an as seen be may that implementing the with competitor (s(project whose) s(organization .evaluated being are toward ideas Preconceived6. ,groups ,individuals of objectives or ,organizations and projects particular the evaluated being organizations .evaluation the bias could that (2) and ability my of best the to and fully form disclosure this completed have I that) 1 (certify I access gain I If .change circumstances relevant if promptly form disclosure this update will I that from information their protect to agree I then ,companies other of information proprietary to the using from refrain and proprietary remains it as long as for disclosure or use unauthorized .furnished was it which for that than other purpose any for information Signature 2021 August 15 Date 61 Initiative) L&E&M (Learning and Evaluation ,Monitoring -16-00002TO-519-AID-15-00024/I-OAA-AID AGREEMENT CONFLICT AND DISCLOSURE-NON USAID JESSUP FRANCESCA OF El in Policy Public in Participation Citizen Promoting USAID the of Evaluation Performance Midterm Salvador but sensitive ",form other any in or written ,oral ,unmarked or marked is Data Sensitive ,Agreement this in used As ,medical as such information and ,information selection source and sensitive procurement” ,information unclassified kind any of information other or ,enforcement law ,visa ,investigatory ,financial ,programmatic ,data beneficiary ,personnel negative a have could or ,group or individual an to treatment unfair or harm in result could ,released if ,which .mission s’USAID or ,relations or policy foreign ,privacy individual upon impact being my of consideration in Agreement this in contained obligations the accept hereby I ,bound legally be to Intending :that acknowledge and understand I specifically and ,Data Sensitive to access granted in Participation Citizen Promoting USAID the of Evaluation Performance Midterm to access given been have I 1. ,compensation for me to assigned duties of performance the facilitate to Data Sensitive Salvador El in Policy Public been has trust and confidence special ,Data Sensitive such to access granted being By .otherwise or monetary Data Sensitive safeguard to responsibility my is it such as and ,Government States United the by me in placed of performance for access requiring not persons to Data Sensitive disclosing from refrain to and ,me to disclosed .duties USAID official Sensitive" access to need "or" know to need "s'recipient the determine must I ,Data Sensitive disclosing Before 2. .purposes USAID for Data agree specifically and ,Act Integrity Procurement The 2107, - 2101 .C.S.U 41, by respects all in abide to agree I 3. not entity or person any to information proposal bid contractor or information selection source disclose to not .information such receive to regulations agency by authorized those as well as ,interests financial and) consideration under and present ,past (employment my reviewed have I 4. or actual no have I ,belief and knowledge my of best the to ,that certify and ,members family household my of and impartial an in duties assigned my perform to capacity my diminish could that interest of conflict potential .manner objective such if ,which ,Data Sensitive to access my of termination the in result may Agreement this of breach Any 5. my of termination the to lead may ,duties assigned my perform to ability my negates effectively termination .access my granted that Agencies or Departments the with relationships other or employment Performance Midterm Salvador El/USAID the for evaluation conducting while ,Data Sensitive use not will I 6. or gain personal for ,Salvador El in Policy Public in Participation Citizen Promoting USAID the of Evaluation ,firm ,person any to Data Sensitive the of part any or all available make or disclose or ,USAID to detrimentally except ,indirectly or directly ,whatsoever purpose or reason any for entity other any or ,association ,corporation .USAID of benefit the for required be may as .me against action adverse for grounds be may data sensitive of mishandling or release unauthorized aware am I 7. of misuse or Act Privacy the by protected data of disclosure unauthorized advised been have I ,addition In and ,law criminal States United of ,violations or ,violation a constitute could Data Sensitive government subject be may safeguards privacy violate who) employees contract some including (workers affiliated-Federally (1905 § USC 18 (law criminal .S.U ,particular In .both or $5,000, to up of fine a ,actions disciplinary to an also is There .employees government by disclosure unauthorized from information confidential protects the to disclosure from information such protecting) FOIA (Act Information of Freedom the from exemption disclosure unauthorized prohibit also employee government each bind that standards ethical the ,Finally .public .(2635.703 CFR 5( 62 States United the of representative authorized an by writing in released am I until and Unless 8. by access obtain may or access have I which to Data Sensitive all that understand I ,Government States United the ,of control the under or ,of property the remain will and now is Agreement this signing upon) a (possession my into come may or has which Data Sensitive all return must I that agree I .Government my of conclusion the upon) b; (Government States United the of representative authorized an by demand ;Data Sensitive to access me granted last that Agency or Department the with relationship other or employment .Data Sensitive to access requires that relationship other or employment my of conclusion the upon) c (or :that Data Sensitive using or disclosing from restricted be not shall I ,foregoing the Notwithstanding 9. (ii; (me by disclosure unauthorized an of result a as than other public the to available generally becomes or is) i( disclosed be to required is) iii (or; law applicable of contravention in not is that manner a in me to available becomes .process legal other or ,order court ,law by ACCEPTANCE .Agreement this of conditions and terms the accepts undersigned The 2021 July th8 Date Signature LEADER TEAM EVALUATION JESSUP FRANCESCA :Title Name 63 FONTAN PABLO JUAN Name Promoting USAID the of Evaluation Performance Midterm Title Salvador El in Policy Public in Participation Citizen Initiative Learning and Evaluation ,Monitoring USAID Organization member Team Leader Team? Position Evaluation Number Award Evaluation (instrument other or contract( 16-00002TO-519-AID-15-00024/I-OAA-AID Evaluated) s(Project USAID implementer ,)s(name project Include( if ,)s(number award and) s(name (applicable Public in Participation Citizen Promoting USAID :Evaluated Project Salvador El in Policy of conflicts potential or real have I .disclose to interest No Yes disclose I ,above answered yes If :facts following the may interest of conflicts potential or Real :to limited not are but ,include an is who member family Close 1. USAID the of employee the managing unit operating the or evaluated being) s(project (s(organization implementing being are) s(project whose .evaluated or ,direct is that interest Financial2. in ,indirect though significant is (s(organization implementing the being are projects whose of outcome the in or evaluated .evaluation the or direct previous or Current3. indirect though significant (s(project the with experience including ,evaluated being design project the in involvement the of iterations previous or .project work previous or Current4. seeking or experience USAID the with employment the managing unit operating implementing the or evaluation 64 (s(project whose) s(organization .evaluated being are work previous or Current5. organization an with experience industry an as seen be may that implementing the with competitor (s(project whose) s(organization .evaluated being are toward ideas Preconceived6. ,groups ,individuals of objectives or ,organizations and projects particular the evaluated being organizations .evaluation the bias could that (2) and ability my of best the to and fully form disclosure this completed have I that) 1 (certify I access gain I If .change circumstances relevant if promptly form disclosure this update will I that from information their protect to agree I then ,companies other of information proprietary to the using from refrain and proprietary remains it as long as for disclosure or use unauthorized .furnished was it which for that than other purpose any for information Signature 2021 August 15 Date 65 Initiative) L&E&M (Learning and Evaluation ,Monitoring -16-00002TO-519-AID-15-00024/I-OAA-AID AGREEMENT CONFLICT AND DISCLOSURE-NON USAID FONTAN PABLO JUAN OF El in Policy Public in Participation Citizen Promoting USAID the of Evaluation Performance Midterm Salvador but sensitive ",form other any in or written ,oral ,unmarked or marked is Data Sensitive ,Agreement this in used As ,medical as such information and ,information selection source and sensitive procurement” ,information unclassified any of information other or ,enforcement law ,visa ,investigatory ,financial ,programmatic ,data beneficiary ,personnel a have could or ,group or individual an to treatment unfair or harm in result could ,released if ,which kind .mission s’USAID or ,relations or policy foreign ,privacy individual upon impact negative being my of consideration in Agreement this in contained obligations the accept hereby I ,bound legally be to Intending :that acknowledge and understand I specifically and ,Data Sensitive to access granted in Participation Citizen Promoting USAID the of Evaluation Performance Midterm to access given been have I 1. for me to assigned duties of performance the facilitate to Data Sensitive Salvador El in Policy Public and confidence special ,Data Sensitive such to access granted being By .otherwise or monetary ,compensation safeguard to responsibility my is it such as and ,Government States United the by me in placed been has trust access requiring not persons to Data Sensitive disclosing from refrain to and ,me to disclosed Data Sensitive .duties USAID official of performance for Sensitive" access to need "or" know to need "s'recipient the determine must I ,Data Sensitive disclosing Before 2. .purposes USAID for Data agree specifically and ,Act Integrity Procurement The 2107, - 2101 .C.S.U 41, by respects all in abide to agree I 3. entity or person any to information proposal bid contractor or information selection source disclose to not .information such receive to regulations agency by authorized not those as well as ,interests financial and) consideration under and present ,past (employment my reviewed have I 4. or actual no have I ,belief and knowledge my of best the to ,that certify and ,members family household my of and impartial an in duties assigned my perform to capacity my diminish could that interest of conflict potential .manner objective such if ,which ,Data Sensitive to access my of termination the in result may Agreement this of breach Any 5. my of termination the to lead may ,duties assigned my perform to ability my negates effectively termination .access my granted that Agencies or Departments the with relationships other or employment Performance Midterm Salvador El/USAID the for evaluation conducting while ,Data Sensitive use not will I 6. or gain personal for ,Salvador El in Policy Public in Participation Citizen Promoting USAID the of Evaluation ,firm ,person any to Data Sensitive the of part any or all available make or disclose or ,USAID to detrimentally ,indirectly or directly ,whatsoever purpose or reason any for entity other any or ,association ,corporation .USAID of benefit the for required be may as except against action adverse for grounds be may data sensitive of mishandling or release unauthorized aware am I 7. misuse or Act Privacy the by protected data of disclosure unauthorized advised been have I ,addition In .me and ,law criminal States United of ,violations or ,violation a constitute could Data Sensitive government of be may safeguards privacy violate who) employees contract some including (workers affiliated-Federally USC 18 (law criminal .S.U ,particular In .both or $5,000, to up of fine a ,actions disciplinary to subject is There .employees government by disclosure unauthorized from information confidential protects) 1905§ disclosure from information such protecting) FOIA (Act Information of Freedom the from exemption an also unauthorized prohibit also employee government each bind that standards ethical the ,Finally .public the to .(2635.703 CFR 5 (disclosure States United the of representative authorized an by writing in released am I until and Unless 8. 66 by access obtain may or access have I which to Data Sensitive all that understand I ,Government States United the ,of control the under or ,of property the remain will and now is Agreement this signing upon) a (possession my into come may or has which Data Sensitive all return must I that agree I .Government my of conclusion the upon) b; (Government States United the of representative authorized an by demand ;Data Sensitive to access me granted last that Agency or Department the with relationship other or employment .Data Sensitive to access requires that relationship other or employment my of conclusion the upon) c (or :that Data Sensitive using or disclosing from restricted be not shall I ,foregoing the Notwithstanding 9. (ii; (me by disclosure unauthorized an of result a as than other public the to available generally becomes or is be to required is) iii (or; law applicable of contravention in not is that manner a in me to available becomes .process legal other or ,order court ,law by disclosed ACCEPTANCE .Agreement this of conditions and terms the accepts undersigned The Date Signature 2021 ,July 8 NUILA FONTÁN PABLO JUAN :Name SPECIALIST DEMOCRACY AND GOVERNMENT :Title 67 VALENCIA SANCHEZ MARGARITA Name Promoting USAID the of Evaluation Performance Midterm Title Salvador El in Policy Public in Participation Citizen Initiative Learning and Evaluation ,Monitoring USAID Organization member Team Leader Team? Position Evaluation Number Award Evaluation (instrument other or contract( 16-00002TO-519-AID-15-00024/I-OAA-AID Evaluated) s(Project USAID implementer ,)s(name project Include( if ,)s(number award and) s(name (applicable Public in Participation Citizen Promoting USAID :Evaluated Project Salvador El in Policy of conflicts potential or real have I .disclose to interest No Yes disclose I ,above answered yes If :facts following the may interest of conflicts potential or Real :to limited not are but ,include an is who member family Close 1. USAID the of employee the managing unit operating the or evaluated being) s(project (s(organization implementing being are) s(project whose .evaluated or ,direct is that interest Financial2. in ,indirect though significant is (s(organization implementing the being are projects whose of outcome the in or evaluated .evaluation the or direct previous or Current3. indirect though significant (s(project the with experience including ,evaluated being design project the in involvement the of iterations previous or .project work previous or Current4. seeking or experience USAID the with employment the managing unit operating implementing the or evaluation 68 (s(project whose) s(organization .evaluated being are work previous or Current5. organization an with experience industry an as seen be may that implementing the with competitor (s(project whose) s(organization .evaluated being are toward ideas Preconceived6. ,groups ,individuals of objectives or ,organizations and projects particular the evaluated being organizations .evaluation the bias could that (2) and ability my of best the to and fully form disclosure this completed have I that) 1 (certify I access gain I If .change circumstances relevant if promptly form disclosure this update will I that from information their protect to agree I then ,companies other of information proprietary to the using from refrain and proprietary remains it as long as for disclosure or use unauthorized .furnished was it which for that than other purpose any for information Signature 2021 15, August Date 69 Initiative) L&E&M (Learning and Evaluation ,Monitoring -16-00002TO-519-AID-15-00024/I-OAA-AID AGREEMENT CONFLICT AND DISCLOSURE-NON USAID SANCHEZ MARGARITA OF El in Policy Public in Participation Citizen Promoting USAID the of Evaluation Performance Midterm Salvador but sensitive ",form other any in or written ,oral ,unmarked or marked is Data Sensitive ,Agreement this in used As ,medical as such information and ,information selection source and sensitive procurement” ,information unclassified any of information other or ,enforcement law ,visa ,investigatory ,financial ,programmatic ,data beneficiary ,personnel a have could or ,group or individual an to treatment unfair or harm in result could ,released if ,which kind .mission s’USAID or ,relations or policy foreign ,privacy individual upon impact negative being my of consideration in Agreement this in contained obligations the accept hereby I ,bound legally be to Intending :that acknowledge and understand I specifically and ,Data Sensitive to access granted Participation Citizen Promoting USAID the of Evaluation Performance Midterm to access given been have I 1. for me to assigned duties of performance the facilitate to Data Sensitive Salvador El in Policy Public in confidence special ,Data Sensitive such to access granted being By .otherwise or monetary ,compensation to responsibility my is it such as and ,Government States United the by me in placed been has trust and not persons to Data Sensitive disclosing from refrain to and ,me to disclosed Data Sensitive safeguard .duties USAID official of performance for access requiring Sensitive" access to need "or" know to need "s'recipient the determine must I ,Data Sensitive disclosing Before 2. .purposes USAID for Data specifically and ,Act Integrity Procurement The 2107, - 2101 .C.S.U 41, by respects all in abide to agree I 3. or person any to information proposal bid contractor or information selection source disclose to not agree .information such receive to regulations agency by authorized not entity as well as ,interests financial and) consideration under and present ,past (employment my reviewed have I 4. no have I ,belief and knowledge my of best the to ,that certify and ,members family household my of those an in duties assigned my perform to capacity my diminish could that interest of conflict potential or actual .manner objective and impartial such if ,which ,Data Sensitive to access my of termination the in result may Agreement this of breach Any 5. my of termination the to lead may ,duties assigned my perform to ability my negates effectively termination .access my granted that Agencies or Departments the with relationships other or employment Performance Midterm Salvador El/USAID the for evaluation conducting while ,Data Sensitive use not will I 6. or gain personal for ,Salvador El in Policy Public in Participation Citizen Promoting USAID the of Evaluation ,person any to Data Sensitive the of part any or all available make or disclose or ,USAID to detrimentally or directly ,whatsoever purpose or reason any for entity other any or ,association ,corporation ,firm .USAID of benefit the for required be may as except ,indirectly against action adverse for grounds be may data sensitive of mishandling or release unauthorized aware am I 7. or Act Privacy the by protected data of disclosure unauthorized advised been have I ,addition In .me criminal States United of ,violations or ,violation a constitute could Data Sensitive government of misuse safeguards privacy violate who) employees contract some including (workers affiliated-Federally and ,law criminal .S.U ,particular In .both or $5,000, to up of fine a ,actions disciplinary to subject be may government by disclosure unauthorized from information confidential protects) 1905 § USC 18 (law such protecting) FOIA (Act Information of Freedom the from exemption an also is There .employees government each bind that standards ethical the ,Finally .public the to disclosure from information .(2635.703 CFR 5 (disclosure unauthorized prohibit also employee States United the of representative authorized an by writing in released am I until and Unless 8. by access obtain may or access have I which to Data Sensitive all that understand I ,Government 70 States United the ,of control the under or ,of property the remain will and now is Agreement this signing upon) a (possession my into come may or has which Data Sensitive all return must I that agree I .Government my of conclusion the upon) b; (Government States United the of representative authorized an by demand ;Data Sensitive to access me granted last that Agency or Department the with relationship other or employment .Data Sensitive to access requires that relationship other or employment my of conclusion the upon) c (or :that Data Sensitive using or disclosing from restricted be not shall I ,foregoing the Notwithstanding 9. (ii; (me by disclosure unauthorized an of result a as than other public the to available generally becomes or is) i( be to required is) iii (or; law applicable of contravention in not is that manner a in me to available becomes .process legal other or ,order court ,law by disclosed ACCEPTANCE .Agreement this of conditions and terms the accepts undersigned The 2021 July th8 Date Signature Specialist Inclusion and Gender Sánchez Margarita :Title Name 71 DIFFERENCES OF STATEMENT :VII ANNEX ACTION COMMENT COMMENT NAME with (FUNDAUNGO 3.4.2, 25, .p to reference in stated was what that believe We “.)text the in 4 point bullet be should paragraph previous the were efforts ,Indeed .relativized political with meet to made TSE Some) i (:makers-decision the in participated Magistrates (ii; (presentations / lectures public participation the of advantage taking four ,lecturers international of organized were meetings private (iii; (TSE the of Magistrates the with the 2019, 28, January on first the presented Consortium Presidential the of documents the for candidates the to Agenda VAMOS ,GANA of presidency-vice DS-PDC-PCN-ARENA the and the for candidate the and ,coalition presidency-vice the and presidency closed two) iv; (FMLN the of international the of meetings the of deputies the and lecturers Electoral the in fractions different the of Commission Reform of delivery) v; Assembly Legislative proposals Agenda Presidential the the of President-Vice the to the) vi; (2020 10, March on Republic to related proposals the of delivery of Minister the with ,portfolio their the 2019, 28, October on Labor abroad Salvadorans of minister-Vice the and 2019, 11, December on 11, February on INJUVE of director " .(2020 :TEAM EVALUATION in listed activities the While comment s’FUNDUNGO to respect with useful are they ,results expected the an constitute not do the ,strategy advocacy which of absence generalized a constitutes is which ET the of concern and broadly more reflected other the in noted The .well as components noted events/activities six s’FUNDAUNGO in the to refer comment completed of presentation different to documents political and policymakers the outside events off￾one are these but ,figures and dynamic a of context process advocacy cohesive up-follow planned any with This .activities or measures again reflected is concern final the in the of Recommendations point bullet 5.3, (evaluation more outline which ,)3 meant is what specifically :strategy advocacy an by employ should USAID“ to manuals advocacy standard establish public for procedures document policy Such .formulation help may documents a design FUNDAUNGO advocacy structured more clearly with ,process :as such ,steps defined mapping stakeholder the of analysis ,phases and campaigns of needs of analysis ,actors political ,spaces making-decision 25, .p (Added bullet 3.4.2, the in 4 point Although) “text FUNDAUNGO organized and events discussion some with groups policymakers a presenting their of number ,publications not did this a constitute advocacy formal “.strategy 72 influence of analysis the of definition ,channels and strategy influence among ,plan activity “.others