November 2020 This report is made possible by the support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), under the terms of YouthPower2: Learning and Evaluation AID Contract #47QRAA19D0006K/7200AA19M00018. The authors’ views expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. YouthPower2: Learning and Evaluation Annual Report Contract Number: 47QRAA19D0006K/7200AA19M00018 Prime Contractor: Making Cents International Reporting Period: September 2019 – September 2020 Year 1 – Annual Report YouthPower2: Learning and Evaluation Annual Report 1 Acronyms APS Annual Program Statement CECA Center on Children in Adversity COR Contracting Officer Representative DREAMS Determined, Resilient, Empowered, AIDS-free, Mentored, and Safe EOI Expression of Interest ESC Eastern and Southern Caribbean GKI Global Knowledge Initiative ICRW International Center for Research on Women ITT Indicator Tracking System KII Key Informant Interview KM Knowledge Management LAAG Learning Agenda Advisory Group LN Learning Network LOE Level of Effort MEL Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning PA Peer Advisor PRH Population and Reproductive Health PSE Private-sector Engagement PYD Positive Youth Development REL Research, Evaluation, and Learning SEL Social and Emotional Learning SOW Scope of Work SRHR Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights UNC University of North Carolina USAID United States Agency for International Development WORQ Workforce Outcomes Reporting Questionnaire YAG Youth Advisory Group YE Youth Engagement YPL YouthPower Learning YP2LE YouthPower2: Learning and Evaluation YouthPower2: Learning and Evaluation Annual Report 2 Contents YouthPower2: Learning and Evaluation Annual Report...........................................................................................0 Acronyms........................................................................................................................................................................1 Contents..........................................................................................................................................................................2 I. Purpose ........................................................................................................................................................................3 II. Accomplishments......................................................................................................................................................3 Activity Management ...............................................................................................................................................4 Task 1: .........................................................................................................................................................................5 Task 2: ......................................................................................................................................................................12 Task 3: .......................................................................................................................................................................15 Task 4: .......................................................................................................................................................................24 III. Problems Encountered and Identified Solutions............................................................................................28 Lessons Learned .....................................................................................................................................................29 V. Indicator Measurement.........................................................................................................................................32 Annex 1: Accomplishments All Funding Sources................................................................................................35 Annex 2. Results of the Satisfaction Survey..........................................................................................................37 Annex 3: YP2LE Youth Advisory Group (YAG)..................................................................................................45 "Without support from the international community, we risk a massive reversal of gains made over the last two decades, and an entire generation lost, if not in lives then in rights, opportunities, and dignity," — Achim Steiner, UNDP Administrator, April 2020 (Guinea Youth Assessment) YouthPower2: Learning and Evaluation Annual Report 3 I. Purpose Making Cents International (Making Cents) was awarded YouthPower2: Learning and Evaluation (YP2LE) in September 2019. YP2LE is a three-year activity with two one-year option periods designed to build, expand, and disseminate Positive Youth Development (PYD) evidence and learning within and across multiple sectors and provide leadership in promoting PYD best practices. The activity will also provide rapid response and technical assistance support to USAID staff and partners to incorporate PYD evidence and best practices into the design, implementation, and evaluation of youth development programs. By the end of the activity, progress by performance areas can be summarized as follows: ✔ Activity Management: Making Cents will work closely with all partners to develop high-quality technical deliverables, while also managing all operations, contract, finance, reporting, and communications functions and creating internal team cohesion and transparency. ✔ Task 1: Advance the PYD Learning Agenda and other youth-related learning agendas: Task 1 activities will work to build more robust PYD data and evidence, while also packaging and disseminating this evidence in user-friendly, actionable tools, resources, and learning products for youth development practitioners. ✔ Task 2: Grow the PYD Learning Network: Task 2 activities will manage and expand a vibrant PYD Learning Network, increasing the number of traditional and non-traditional partners (including the private sector, universities, and youth-led organizations) collaborating, sharing, disseminating, and applying PYD best practices and lessons learned. This network will be leveraged to disseminate and improve the knowledge, skills, and practices of those working in global PYD. ✔ Task 3: Enhance the YouthPower.org and YouthLead.org Platforms: Task 3 activities will serve to increase the number of stakeholders informed by evidence, knowledge, and data on PYD, including young change-makers, so they can better apply PYD principles and practices. ✔ Task 4: Provide Rapid Response Technical Support Through Buy-ins: Task 4 activities will serve to increase the number of PYD-focused USAID-funded activities and policies, as well as the capacity and understanding of USAID staff, partners, and youth-led/youth-serving organizations on PYD best practices and youth systems. II. Accomplishments During Year 1, YP2LE made progress toward the Expected Results as outlined in the Request for Quotation (RFQ) USAID No. 7200AA19Q00024 for YP2LE. As outlined in the RFQ, YP2LE will design, conduct, and/or support research, analyses, and evaluations that respond to the priority questions listed in the PYD learning agenda and other youth-related learning agendas. This Year 1 Annual Report will demonstrate achievements made toward the Expected Results outlined in the RFQ and the Year 1 Annual Workplan. In Year 1, Making Cents achieved the following: YouthPower2: Learning and Evaluation Annual Report 4 Activity Management Accomplishments ✔ Monthly and Quarterly Financial Reports and Requested Pipeline Reports Submitted. All financial reports and pipeline requests have been submitted as required and requested. ✔ Bi-weekly COR Calls Conducted. Regular calls with the COR and other USAID representatives providing support and guidance for various YP2LE activities and buy-ins were held bi-weekly. An extensive Activity Tracker and dashboard was developed to track progress across the project and guide the agenda of the COR meetings. ✔ Indicator Tracking System (ITT) and Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning (MEL) Plan Designed and Disseminated. The first major activity completed in Year 1 was the ITT and MEL plan. Under Task 1, the YP2LE Research, Evaluation, and Learning Manager and the Lead Technical Advisor drafted the MEL plan and submitted it to USAID for approval in October 2019. Upon approval in February 2020, the team created an excel indicator tracking file to monitor key performance indicators each quarter. At the end of each quarter, the team met with each task lead to review the reporting process, discuss indicator data count, and revise the ITT as needed. ✔ ITT Training Session Conducted. To support quality and accurate reporting, the Lead Technical Advisor conducted a training workshop on the development of indicators. The training included refreshing the team members’ knowledge on development of strong indicators, understanding the differences between indicators and data, clarifying the team’s understanding on how to count and report for each of YP2LE’s main indicators and how to develop performance reference sheets. The training increased the team’s confidence in tracking and reporting for their tasks and further ensured the fidelity of the data being reported. ✔ Youth Advisory Group (YAG) Finalized. A term of reference was developed to define the roles of the YAG and to inform recruitment of the YAG members. Recruitment was initiated in April 2020. YP2LE launched, identified, recruited, and completed the onboarding process for seven YP2LE YAG members, selected from among 1,300 candidates. The seven-member YAG includes young changemakers from Bolivia, Kenya, Lesotho, Mauritius, Nepal, West Bank, and Uganda. A YAG Kick-Off Meeting was held to orient members to the project and their respective roles under Tasks 1 – 4. The YAG also participated in a group co-creation process to agree on the purpose, goals, and engagement of the YAG members. Additionally, YP2LE identified and on-boarded a YAG member to serve as the PYD Learning Network Liaison. ✔ YP2LE Kick-Off Meeting Held. YP2LE held its virtual kick-off meeting in December 2019. The task 1 team developed a short survey poll to gather data on research priorities and gaps. The findings were summarized, and an infographic was created to share at the YP2LE LAAG meeting. The summary was also shared with USAID for comment and input prior to the LAAG meeting. ✔ YP2LE Partner Meeting Held. YP2LE held a partner meeting in June 2020. The meeting served to introduce the new YP2LE Project Director and to provide an update on activities, priorities, and plans for the remainder of Year 1. ✔ Increased platform usage on YouthPower.org and YouthLead.org. Traffic on both platforms increased with 157,364 unique users and 802,195 page views on YouthLead.org and 124,526 unique users and 365,081 page views on YouthPower.org. YouthPower2: Learning and Evaluation Annual Report 5 Source: Google Analytics ✔ Communications, Branding, and Marking Plan Developed. The YP2LE Communications, Branding, and Marking Plan was developed, submitted, and approved in February 2020. ✔ YP2LE Factsheets Created. A YP2LE factsheet and a Buy-in factsheet were developed, submitted, and approved in March 2020. ✔ YP2LE Social Media Channels Followers Engaged. During FY20, 315 followers were gained, and 128 tweets were posted across the YouthPower and YouthLead Twitter channels. On Facebook across our channels and during the same time period, 1,455 Facebook fans were gained and we had 72 posts. These posts highlighted YP2LE and youth-related activities, events, products, and campaigns as well as pushed traffic to the YouthPower.org and YouthLead.org platforms. A draft plan for an Instagram account has been developed and will move forward in YR2 as a new communications member is hired. ✔ YP2LE Quarterly Newsletters Disseminated. The YouthLead Quarterly newsletter was disseminated in July 2020, and the YouthPower Quarterly newsletter was sent out in August 2020. These two newsletters feature a quarterly review of YP2LE activities, events, opportunities, and campaigns, as well as stories of our partners and network members. Task 1: During Year 1 YP2LE made progress toward achievement of the Expected Results in the RFQ. ● Expected Result 1: Increased and more robust data and evidence for what works and for whom in PYD and cross-sectoral youth programming. ● Expected Result 2: Improved dissemination of PYD evidence and learning products and uptake of information for design and implementation of PYD programming. In Year 1, the YP2LE Task 1 team began to build a robust evidence base for PYD and cross-sectoral youth programming. The following section details the specific activities and deliverables for Task 1, including the cross-cutting activities for youth engagement and communications. The section also highlights our plans for Year 2 fiscal year 2021 (FY21). Accomplishments ● Established and convened the Learning Agenda Advisory Group (LAAG) Twice to Gather Input on the PYD Learning Agenda and Ongoing Research Studies. ● Drafted the Literature Review Report, Review of What Works in Designing Systems and Scaling PYD Programs. The report resulted in a series of follow-up interviews with members of the Youth Systems Collaborative and other youth-focused YouthPower2: Learning and Evaluation Annual Report 6 organizations working on systems issues. The YP2LE team will use the results of the interviews and meetings to elaborate additional systems-related work in Year 2. ● Reviewed More Than 24,000 Citations and Interviewed a Dozen Key Stakeholders as Part of the Systematic Review of the Impact of PYD on Marginalized and Vulnerable Youth. The result is a comprehensive, 50-page report on the definitions of marginalized and vulnerable youth and a summary of the literature on the impact PYD-type programs have on these populations. ● Drafted a Concept Note for Designing a Youth Civic Engagement Index. The concept note led to several meetings with USAID/Washington and USAID/DRG about how a comprehensive index would contribute to USAID’s objectives around youth civic engagement. The YP2LE team is in the process of working with USAID to refine this activity. ● Held Two Roundtable Discussions Related to Cross-Sectoral Programming and Youth Engagement, Respectively. The purpose of these roundtables was to clarify the knowledge gaps around both of these topics and identify what types of products and research would be most relevant and responsive to the needs of the sector. The result of the meetings led to a refinement of the research questions that we will study in the remaining years of YP2LE. These questions include: a. Examining the link between PYD domains and cross-sector programming; b. The impact of cross-sector youth programming on poverty; c. The impact of cross-sector/integrated programming on food systems programming and policies; d. An outcomes analysis of the FP2020 results; e. How engaging early age youth (pre-15) could impact their future engagement in the community; f. The contribution of youth to improving the social and emotional environment of schools; and g. Research on best practices in engaging youth as data collectors in crisis and conflict settings. ● Held Initial Meetings with USAID Nigeria and USAID Washington to Begin Planning Cross-Sector Impact Evaluation in Collaboration with the PRH Office of USAID. Additional meetings will be necessary before we can determine the nature of the impact evaluation. ● Completed a WORQ Brief for USAID Washington to Support their WORQ Training Modules. The result of a brief that shows Missions and implementing partners how to use WORQ tools as part of the data management system. ● Developed and Implemented the Indicator Tracking System. The system allows our team to track results on a quarterly basis and report those results to USAID. ● Trained YP2LE Task Leads on Designing, Collecting Data, and Reporting Indicator Data. The result of the training led to more accurate reporting and a final refinement of indicator definitions and disaggregation. ● Conducted a Satisfaction Survey of the Learning Network, Youthpower.org and YouthLead.org. The result of the survey showed that 75 percent of the learning network are satisfied with the websites and 86 percent are satisfied with the network itself. Details of the survey findings are discussed later in the report. YouthPower2: Learning and Evaluation Annual Report 7 Satisfaction Survey Findings Activity and Findings Systematic Literature Review of Positive Youth Development Impacts on Marginalized and Vulnerable Youth There are few measures or tools for determining the vulnerability and marginalization of youth in LMICs. PYD approaches are rarely used to design youth programs. Youth-focused programs were comparably distributed across three development sectors—health; democracy and governance; and economic development and education. Of the 38 programs identified, 25 programs were single sector focused and 13 were multi-sector focused. Youth-friendly public policies, community involvement, compatibility with cultural and social norms, and creative use of media tend to be the main facilitators of success on youth programs. Multicomponent, cross-sectoral interventions tend to yield more positive outcomes than standalone or individual programs targeting a specific issue. The number of programs with high-quality evaluation design remains scarce, restricting our ability to assess program impacts. Review of what works in designing systems and scaling Positive Youth Development programs An effective innovation, even one with proven results, cannot be assumed to be immediately scalable. It requires a deliberate scale up strategy that considers all aspects of the scaling process, including organizational processes; costs and resource allocation; continuous monitoring and evaluation around scaling; and subsequent dissemination and advocacy for implementation at scale. The review not only emphasizes the importance of vertical scale-up, but also the difficulties associated with the complexity and difficulty of institutionalizing innovations, with shortfalls and subsequent threats to sustainability widely documented. NGO leadership has advantages but makes scaling and systematization more difficult. Actors throughout the system must be engaged from the beginning and engaged in the sustainability strategy for scale-up to be successful. Throughout Year 1, the team worked closely with the COR to discuss priorities for the Learning Agenda and convene meetings with the broader USAID youth network. The accomplishments highlight the integrated work completed with USAID and consortia research partners. ✔ Two LAAG Meetings Convened. The first LAAG meeting was held on March 12, 2020. The meeting included selected representatives from each research partner organization as well as members of USAID’s research team. LAAG members provided guidance on FY20 research activities and other knowledge capture and cross-country activities, including any suggestions for updates to the PYD Learning Agenda. Meeting notes and priority research themes identified during the meeting were shared with LAAG members for comment. LAAG members identified systems and scaling, cost-effectiveness, marginalized and vulnerable youth, and behavior change as the priority themes for research studies in Year 1. We held the second LAAG meeting on July 29, 2020. We reviewed the PYD research agenda and focus of activities for Year 1. FHI360 and UNC shared updates on their YouthPower2: Learning and Evaluation Annual Report 8 research activities and representatives provided input on the next year’s work plan and updates to the PYD Learning Agenda. YP2LE continues to work with USAID and our YP2LE partners to identify additional potential projects and studies that can serve as options for conducting short-, medium-, and long-term options for contributing to the global evidence base. ✔ Youth Researcher to the LAAG On-Boarded. YP2LE worked with Restless Development to successfully recruit and onboard a youth researcher to help advance the PYD Learning Agenda and other youth-related learning agendas. The youth researcher participated in both PYD LAAG meetings in March and July of 2020, as well as provided feedback on youth engagement research priorities for Year 2 project activities. The Youth Researcher, Hilda Namakula, is expected to participate in future discussions on youth engagement as well as research activities related to their area of expertise, particularly family planning and reproductive health (FP/RH). ✔ PYD Research Priorities Advanced. The Task 1 team completed a series of activities to move the PYD research agenda forward in Year 1. The following list highlights the main achievements. ● Drafted Scopes of Work. After reviewing the proposed research priorities with USAID, the team drafted two scopes of work to be commissioned with YP2LE partners. The scopes included, (1) A literature review of what works in designing Systems and Scaling PYD programs (which includes a component focused on cost and cost-effectiveness); (2) a systematic review of PYD impacts on Marginalized and Vulnerable Youth. Each team shared initial findings at the second LAAG meeting in July; and (3) cost and cost-effectiveness of PYD programs. ● Disseminated a Request for Expressions of Interest (EOI) to YP2LE Partners. Three YP2LE partner organizations responded to the systems and scaling study and four partners responded to the marginalized and vulnerable populations study. Partners’ responses to the EOI process were scored internally using a set of criteria. The YP2LE selected the team from FHI 360 to complete the systematic review on Systems and Scaling and the Global Social Development Innovations team at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC) to complete the systematic review on marginalized and vulnerable populations. The two teams began their respective research activities in June 2020. In September, Mathematica provided a SOW for completing the cost and cost-effectiveness review of PYD programs, which was reviewed by USAID and approved. At the time of this report, Mathematica began the study in November 2020 and is in the process of reviewing youth projects to document common interventions. ● Initiated a Systematic Literature Review of Positive Youth Development Impacts on Marginalized and Vulnerable Youth. The UNC team began research in June 2020. Biweekly meetings were held to assess progress, share updates, and address emerging questions. “There are a lot of (young) people wandering in the streets, some of them could be key resources for the country, but we are not taking care of them. In some countries, structures exist to take care of them, coach them and help them to grow.” — Donor, Morocco “Poor and weak education system creates weak and incompetent generations.” — Youth Consultative Body “because for them, marriage is an exit door and gateway to freedom. These are girls who have no freedom and who are deprived of dreams by being single, they cannot go out, they cannot travel. Those wanting to study cannot go far” — Female Youth Researcher, Mauritania YouthPower2: Learning and Evaluation Annual Report 9 The UNC Team identified more than 24,000 potential citations during their initial review of the literature. Based on exclusion criteria, the team eventually reduced the number of full text articles to approximately 600 references. We worked closely with UNC throughout the year to extend their timeline as a result of the unprecedented number of citations the team reviewed. UNC also completed a youth focus group discussion (FGDs) and approximately eight key informant interviews (KIIs) with youth development stakeholder and vulnerable and marginalized youth to supplement review findings. The draft report will be shared with internal YP2LE staff for review in late October 2020. Draft review deliverables will be peer-reviewed by two LAAG representatives for more in-depth feedback before finalizing and being shared with USAID in November of 2020. Findings from these studies will be used to inform updates to the PYD Learning Agenda and will be posted under the PYD Learning Agenda topics located on YouthPower.org. ● Completed Literature Review on Scaling-Up of PYD and Youth Programs. FHI360 began their literature review in June 2020. Bi-weekly check in meetings with the FHI360 team were held to assess progress and problem-solve challenges. Based on a series of challenges, the scope of the FHI360 literature review was substantively reduced to focus only on PYD programming. The cost-effectiveness analysis was eliminated from the review. FHI360 submitted their final report in September 2020. After the review of the report, a series of products were identified that will complement this initial review and will be completed in Year 2. The complementary products include a five to seven page brief with additional literature and case studies; a revised scope of work (SOW) with a structured outline to answer primary research questions, including key informant interviews (KIIs); a summary of findings from KIIs systems experts on the Youth Systems Collaborative, LAAG, and other stakeholders; content development for a “What Works” page; and a cost-effectiveness framework for PYD programming. These products are already underway as part of YP2LE’s approved Year 2 workplan. ● Made Headway on Additional Research. Topics research include cross-sectoral impacts of PYD on youth and on the effectiveness of youth engagement in PYD programming. The team held two roundtable discussions to clarify the knowledge gaps around cross-sectoral impacts of PYD on youth and the effectiveness of youth engagement in PYD programming and identify areas for further research. The discussion on youth engagement included key stakeholders from USAID and representatives from YP2LE partners: Voluntary Service Overseas (VSO), Restless Development, and the University of Melbourne. The discussion on cross-sectoral impacts also included USAID and representatives from YP2LE partners: the International Center for Research on Women (ICRW), NORC, UNC, and the University of Washington. The roundtable discussions generated numerous ideas for potential products and long-term studies, including approaches to build on previously completed and ongoing USAID studies. YP2LE finalized and shared the notes from the meetings with LAAG members prior to the second LAAG meeting. Key cross-sectoral topics identified in these discussions included: (1) examining the link between PYD domains and cross-sector programming; (2) the impact of cross-sector youth programming on poverty; (3) the impact of cross-sector/integrated programming on food systems programming and policies; and (4) an outcomes analysis of the FP2020 results. Youth engagement topics of interest included (1) engagement of early age youth “Youth that participated in our focus groups want to be engaged in their communities, but they don’t know how or where to engage. There is no system in place to help youth understand how they can help and where they can go to become more civically active.” — Donor Participant YouthPower2: Learning and Evaluation Annual Report 10 (pre-15) and their future engagement in communities; (2) the contribution of youth to improving social and emotional environment in schools, particularly in a COVID-19 context; (3) engaging youth as researchers and best practices to collect data in conflict and crisis-affected settings; (4) best practices for measuring youth engagement; and (5) program design related to youth engagement. YP2LE identified two main studies in partnership with USAID following these roundtable meetings. First, YP2LE plans to conduct a qualitative secondary analysis of the FP2020 results and, if appropriate, develop a policy brief that synthesizes the learnings around accountability and youth engagement for USAID. Second, we will partner with PRH, USAID/Nigeria, and DAI, to design an impact evaluation of the YPower for Adolescent Health Program that focuses on the cross-sector impacts on family planning and workforce development among urban youth. As part of this impact evaluation, we will explore whether we can also measure any impacts of youth engagement interventions. ● Youth Civic Engagement Index Concept Note Drafted. The REL Manager, Lead Technical Advisor, and YP2LE partner ICRW worked together to develop a concept note that explores the possible use of a Youth Civic Engagement Index to be displayed as a dashboard on Youthlead.org. The concept note is intended to define youth civic engagement and its key correlates, youth civic engagement in programming, and historical approaches to measuring youth civic engagement; in addition to outlining the purpose, foundational frameworks, and implementation process for the Youth Civic Engagement Index. The concept note has been drafted with 20 proposed indicators for measuring youth civic engagement from the perspective of youth, specifically regarding youth’s perceptions of community engagement, opinions on public institutions and related engagement, and beliefs and behaviors related to advocacy and activism. The draft note and indicators were shared with USAID in September of 2020, and initial feedback was provided to the YP2LE internal team. In the upcoming quarter, meetings will be held with other USAID stakeholders carrying out youth civic engagement activities to discuss areas of shared interest and potential collaboration. Based on these meetings, the Youth Civic Engagement Index will be finalized with a plan to pilot test the index in 2021. ● WORQ Tool Developed. At USAID’s request in April 2020, YP2LE developed a brief guidance document for Missions to implement the Workforce Outcomes Reporting Questionnaire (WORQ) tool, which provides background on the development of the WORQ tool and the measurement properties of the four WORQ assessments; recommendations for when to use each assessment and related decision points for implementing partners; guidance and a conceptual framework for data quality assurance and management; and links to related tools and points of contact. YP2LE drafted the brief and met with USAID for feedback to refine its focus. The guidance document is undergoing final edits and design before being publicly disseminated to Missions and other stakeholders in November 2020. ● Cost-effectiveness of PYD Programming Study Initiated. YP2LE research partner Mathematica drafted a proposed SOW to develop a framework for using PYD features to measure the cost-effectiveness of PYD programming. The activity will involve completion of the following tasks: 1) a review of USAID cost guidance, YouthPower, other youth programs, and studies on cost and cost-effectiveness; 2) analysis of data from reviewed documents and development of a framework to support doing cost-effectiveness research using the PYD- “Participants mentioned the fact that it was the first time that people went out to solicit them, collect their ideas and take them into account without any judgement. These people feel valued and so having discussion forums and opportunities for them to think and act within their communities is important.” — Youth Focus Groups, Mauritania YouthPower2: Learning and Evaluation Annual Report 11 specific features; and 3) development of a brief synthesizing review findings, the PYD cost effectiveness framework, and guidance for youth programs. The activity will complement on￾going USAID cost and cost-effectiveness activities but will be geared towards an external audience. The SOW was approved as part of the Year 2 workplan. ✔ ITT Priorities Advanced. Throughout the first year, the YP2LE research team developed, implemented, and guided the M&E reporting system. ● Indicator Training for YP2LE Task Leads Completed. The YP2LE Technical lead held a training workshop in September to help team members understand how to design indicators, collect accurate data, and report ITT results. The two-hour seminar used existing indicators and helped the team break down the indicator components, revise definitions to be clearer, and understand the differences between indicators and data. The objective of the training was to help all YP2LE members collect and report accurate information. ● Satisfaction Survey Related to the Learning Network, YouthPower.org and YouthLead.org Implemented. The YP2E M&E team designed and implemented a survey to collect information related to the satisfaction levels of learning network members. The survey consisted of 17 questions that gathered information on the newsletter, participation in the network, and recent changes to the configuration of the network. Of the 504 people who consented to take the survey, 290 respondents said they were engaged in the YouthPower Learning Network and up to 249 respondents answered questions from that section. The majority of survey respondents were male (64 percent) and 58 percent fell into the age bracket of 25-34 years. The overall satisfaction level of learning network members is 86 percent. The average satisfaction varies among different categories of participants. USAID Missions are the least satisfied (77 percent satisfaction level) while implementing partners, NGOs, and host country governments tended to have the highest satisfaction levels (87 percent). Male members were slightly more satisfied (87 percent) compared to female respondents (84 percent), but those percentages could easily change if more women had responded to the survey. When we looked at overall satisfaction by sector, learning network members in the agriculture, food security, and nutrition sector were the most satisfied (92 percent satisfaction levels) followed closely by members in the health sector (89 percent satisfaction level). Detailed results from the satisfaction survey are located in Annex II. Youth Engagement in Task 1 YP2LE worked with Restless Development to successfully recruit and onboard a youth researcher to advance the PYD Learning Agenda and other youth-related learning activities. The Youth Research Advisor participated in the PYD LAAG meetings held March 12 and July 20, which identified and set priority themes for research in FY20 and FY21. The Task 1 team connected with the Youth Research Advisor to ensure input was incorporated into the research agenda. Throughout FY20, the Youth Research Advisor was engaged in research activities, including a one-on-one meeting following the roundtable discussion with USAID and YP2LE partner organizations on youth engagement research priorities and opportunities. The Youth Research Advisor provided feedback on USAID’s shared priorities for youth engagement research (e.g., youth engagement, SEL in school environments, and the COVID-19 pandemic). Her input was incorporated into the research priorities summary table from the LAAG. Communications in Task I During FY20, the Communications team worked with the Task 1 team to develop and finalize products and documents to aid their Task 1 activities, such as the graphic for the LAAG meetings, PowerPoint YouthPower2: Learning and Evaluation Annual Report 12 editing, and publication editing and design. In addition, the communications team provided consultation, editing, graphic design, and dissemination of the YP2LE satisfaction survey across our varies platforms. Task 2: As outlined in the RFQ, under this task YP2LE shall manage a cross-sectoral PYD Learning Network in which YP and YP2 implementing partners, other youth development practitioners, donors, stakeholders (including youth), and USAID staff share evidence and best practices from cross-sectoral PYD. ● Expected Result 1: Improved knowledge, skills, practices, and partnerships around international, cross-sectoral PYD. ● Expected Result 2: Increased number of traditional and non-traditional partners collaborating, sharing, disseminating, and applying PYD lessons learned and best practices. The following accomplishments demonstrate the progress made in Year 1 to achieving the Expected Results in the RFQ and the goals and objectives outlined in the YP2LE Year 1 Annual Workplan. Accomplishments ● Completed Learning Network (LN) assessment report, resulting in a better understanding of community members’ needs. ● Completed LN strategy resulting in a more flexible LN structure to support different types of communities and groups sharing knowledge and learning ● Created and launched new LN, including the first three new Communities of Practice. ● Implemented Collaboration Group activities including webinars, meetings, and a video to showcase private-sector engagement and to ensure that learnings from implementation projects are captured before they are closed. During Year 1 (FY20), the YP2LE Task 2 team accomplished the following. Learning Network Activities ✔ Stakeholder Map Created. Through discussions with the Sr. KM Specialist and YouthPower Learning Team members, YP2LE partner, Global Knowledge Initiative (GKI), created an initial stakeholder map by sorting them into the following groups, which were used for interview and survey purposes: ● CoP co-champions (current and former) ● CoP members ● YouthPower Learning leadership ● YouthLead members (including mentors and ambassadors) ● Private-sector contacts ● USAID missions ● Newsletter subscribers (YouthPower or YouthLead) ● YouthPower.org or YouthLead.org website visitors YouthPower2: Learning and Evaluation Annual Report 13 The grouping guided the mapping process and were reflected in the invitations for the co-creation sessions. The mapping led to the creation of personae and informed the interviews during the testing phase for the strategy. The personae developed were: youth project practitioner (including YP2LE implementing partners as a subcategory), other sector project practitioner (with work intersecting with youth), youth leader, member or leader of locally led youth organization, member or leader of locally led other sector organization (with work intersecting with youth in some way), private-sector representative, and foundation representative. ✔ Learning Network Assessment Activities Conducted. During the second quarter of FY20, GKI led network assessment activities that included reviewing documents and conducting key informant interviews, administering a survey of community of practice members, and administering a survey of the broader learning network. ✔ Learning Network Listening Report Completed. The Learning Network Listening Report was completed based on input from the assessment. The report was completed in Q3 and submitted to USAID for review during the first co-creation session on June 2. The document provides an overview and analysis of feedback on experience of YouthPower Learning’s (YPL) Communities of Practice, youth networks, and other Learning Network activities, and recommendation to enhance the Learning Network. ✔ Learning Network Co-Creation Sessions Designed and Delivered. The YP2LE team designed, planned, and completed a virtual co-creation session with USAID and four virtual co￾creation sessions with a cross-section of network members to gather input for the membership, structure, format, and processes of the new Learning Network. The findings and materials from the Listening Report formed the basis of the co-creation meetings in June, which served to enhance the effectiveness of the Learning Network, including the Communities of Practice. ✔ Learning Network Strategy Finalized. The YP2LE team used the findings from the co-creation sessions to develop a Learning Network strategy and structure that provides more flexibility and agility to support different types of communities and groups sharing knowledge and learning. The strategy was shared and tested with a selection of co-creation session participants and USAID for testing. YouthPower2: Learning and Evaluation Annual Report 14 ✔ New Learning Network Launched. The new Learning Network was launched in Q4 of Year 1. A key activity was the introduction of three Communities of Practice (CoP). ● Business, Entrepreneurship, and Private-Sector Engagement: This CoP is focused on building skills in entrepreneurship and on collaboration with the private sector. Open to all sectors, the CoP will have an emphasis on agriculture initially, adding other sectors such as health, education, or transport based on member interest. ● Gender: Focused on integrated youth-centered and gender-transformative programming through positive youth development. o Additional groups are being evaluated either as CoPs, affinity groups, or targeted working/learning groups (e.g., WORQs, Passages, workforce development and higher education, collaboration with the Global Collaborative on Youth in Peace and Security). ● Youth Engagement: Focused on meaningful youth engagement in all aspects of youth programming. ✔ Learning Network Leaders and Facilitators Recruited. The Sr. KM Specialist is the Learning Network Leader. The Communities Manager for the Learning Network is filled by YP2LE partner, GKI. The CoP Champions for two of the new CoPs have been identified, and the process for selecting the third champion will be finalized in Quarter1 of Year 2. The YP2LE team launched a call for applications for CoP Youth Advisors, and the selection process is underway. We selected the new CoP champions and co-champion/youth advisors for each CoP: Heather Marlow (Gender CoP Champion), Shillah Salim (Gender CoP Youth Advisor), Lara Goldmark (Business, Entrepreneurship and PSE CoP Champion), Jack Omondi (Business, Entrepreneurship and PSE CoP Youth Advisor), Aapurv Jain (Youth Engagement CoP Champion), and Balkis Chaabane (Youth Engagement CoP Youth Advisor). Throughout the process we have engaged with the YAG member, Zwelithini Matsoso. In parallel with the launch of the new LN, we started planning the first LN-wide webinar series on systems mapping. This three-part webinar series is being offered to the broader LN as a skill￾building activity with the option to receive a certificate of participation after taking a quiz. Collaboration Group Activities ✔ Collaboration Group Meeting Held (In-Person) January 2020. 48 people attended the meeting held in Washington, D.C. on January 24, 2020. In attendance were representatives from USAID, currently funded YouthPower1 Task Orders (TOs), and other relevant stakeholders, including youth organizations that had received a grant under YPL. All YouthPower TOs had representation at the meeting. The theme for the meeting was How to Create a Successful Enabling Environment for Youth Projects with the main goal of sharing experiences and best practices. In small groups, participants shared best practices and challenges based on project experiences, as well as other learnings. Participants received the presentations and a meeting summary following the meeting to facilitate knowledge sharing. ✔ Collaboration Team Activities Designed. Individualized calls were conducted with YouthPower Task order recipients. Given field teams were unable to participate in the collaboration “It is biggest youth network for young people who are agents of change and being part will provide a wider platform/higher grounds for connection, sharing knowledge and as well a greater learning process as a leader in my communities.” — Male, aged 25-29 YouthPower2: Learning and Evaluation Annual Report 15 team meeting, follow-up calls were organized to identify interests in learning topics, gather information on resources for sharing amongst team members, and determine the preferred method for communication. Based on this information, a series of recommendations were developed which led to the regular webinars with the collaboration team. ✔ Collaboration Webinars Hosted. Based on feedback from the task order teams and the inability to have in-person meetings due to the COVID-19 epidemic, USAID approved to replace the April in-person meeting with regular webinars, quarterly topical meetings, and knowledge-sharing activities from implementation projects. ● K-YES and YouthPower Jordan shared in the first monthly webinar on July 22. The presentations focused project impact and ability to pivot due to COVID-19. ● Puentes para el Empleo from El Salvador shared their insights on how to engage with the private sector in a second webinar that was held on September 23. The project team was joined by one of their private-sector partners, the local IBM organization. In addition, representatives from the newly selected Addendum under APS, Youth Excel, which is led by IREX, also joined the webinar. ✔ Video Product Developed. To share good practices about private-sector engagement from El Salvador a video was produced in collaboration with YP2LE partner, Cloudburst, using the Puentes para el Empleo project to demonstrate the positive impact of collaboration with the private sector. The video has been completed and is under final review by USAID. Youth Engagement in Task 2 The Senior Youth Engagement Advisor worked with the YouthLead team to identify and onboard a YAG member to serve as the Learning Network Steering Committee liaison. In this role, the YAG member advises on youth engagement strategies and approaches for the Learning Network and its related activities. He participates in the LN Steering Committee meetings and, in FY21, will join the Group Leaders Cohort monthly meetings that consists of knowledge sharing, capacity strengthening, and idea generation and brainstorming about CoP Champions, CoP Youth Advisors, and Affinity Group needs. In FY20, the YAG member participated in the virtual co-creation sessions in June 2020 with USAID that informed the Learning Network strategy and design, and he also attended the Learning Network kick off meeting held in October 2020. In addition, he helped to test the Google groups form designed by GKI that will be used by Network members to propose CoPs, affinity groups, and small groups. Communications in Task 2 The Communications team worked with the Senior Knowledge Management Specialist and GKI on the editing, layout, and dissemination of the LN Listening Survey, invitations, and the corresponding reports. In addition, the team assisted in the launch of the Learning Network through the dissemination of the invitation to the CoP introductory webinar and assisted with the facilitation of the webinar. The team also collaborated with the Senior Knowledge Management Specialist and Cloudburst on the creation of the Puentes para Empleo video. The video will be disseminated in early FY21. Task 3: YP2LE made progress in Year 1 toward the achievement of the Expected Results as outlined in the RFQ and in the goals and objectives as outlined in the approved Year 1 YP2LE Annual Workplan. YouthPower2: Learning and Evaluation Annual Report 16 Expected Result 1: Increased number of stakeholders informed by evidence, knowledge, and data on international, cross-sectoral, positive youth development programming and able to apply evidence to programming. Expected Result 2: Increased engagement of youth-led and youth-serving organizations and young changemakers in USAID and other programs and networks. Expected Result 3: Increased application of PYD evidence and best practices within USAID and other programming as appropriate. Accomplishments: YouthPower.org and YouthLead.org received high visibility and usage Source: Google Analytics ● Curated, tagged, and posted content on YouthLead.org and YouthPower.org. ● Developed two new ‘what works’ pages on very young adolescents and first-time parents. ● Created new product pages/microsites. ● Maintained and developed Country pages. ● Grew YouthLead membership to over 10,000 registered members. ● Updated navigation and search capability. ● Established and onboarded the YAG and engaged members across YP2LE tasks. ● Supported and graduated second cohort of 19 YouthLead Ambassadors (YLA) and seven Peer Advisors. ● Initiated the YouthLead mentorship initiative. ● Finalized SOW for the development of the YP2LE Private-Sector Engagement (PSE) strategy. ● Developed concept for Youth Civic Engagement Index. ✔ YouthLead.org Enhanced. YP2LE reviewed, approved, and published a total of 1203 new resources, 718 events, 284 projects, and 487 funding opportunities in addition to monitoring 1662 discussion postings. YouthLead members were asking questions about volunteering opportunities, asked for advice on personality traits, or how to end a rape culture, just to name a few examples. ✔ YouthPower.org Enhanced. YP2LE created content for YouthPower.org, including the preparation of draft text for the Youth Center Toolkit as well as posting and tagging relevant new content. Efforts included posting 576 new resources, 182 events, and 28 news items. As the new discussion groups were launched on YouthPower.org, YP2LE also monitored 57 new discussions. YouthPower2: Learning and Evaluation Annual Report 17 ✔ YouthLead and YouthPower Membership/Networks Expanded. Over the course of the year, 5167 YouthLead.org applicants and 5012 new members were approved. The 10,000 members threshold was passed for a total reach of 10,889 YouthLead members by September 30, 2020. On YouthPower.org, YP2LE added the ability for users to join as members and join new discussion groups. This capability was promoted in September 2020 with the launch of the new Learning Network. By September 30, 2020, 398 new members were approved on YouthPower.org. YouthLead Membership grew from 4,800 to almost 10,900 Source: YouthLead.org membership YouthLead members are primarily interested in Education, Gender, Democracy, Human Rights and Governance, and Economic Growth and Entrepreneurship sectors “The site has many useful resources and a wealth of information.” — Female participant, 35+ “Given my work in capacity building and business support that I offer to the youth and corporate institutions, the content from the newsletters especially the links to the various resources offer me extra information to better support the different sets of people that I work with.” — Male, aged 25-29 “As an educator, sometimes you get stuck in trying to innovate lessons. The newsletter helps me create and envision new lessons from the ideas I read.” — Female, aged 25-29 YouthPower2: Learning and Evaluation Annual Report 18 Source: YouthLead.org member profiles ✔ New What Works Pages Created: YP2LE developed content for a new page on very young adolescents and another on first-time parents. The content is still under review by USAID. Several other pages have undergone minor updates. ✔ New Microsite Pages Created on YouthPower.org. The content for “Youth Center Toolkit: Creating Safe Spaces, Youth Centers, and After-School Programs” was drafted under YouthPower Learning (YPL). As the content was being finalized and edited, the team began creating the toolkit for the website. The PDF-version of the text has been designed, and final edits are being incorporated based on USAID feedback. Completion and publishing of the online version of the toolkit is expected in November 2020, with a launch to be held sometime in February. ✔ Site Navigation Updated. Developed and completed a YouthLead.org and YouthPower.org transition plan by early May. The communications team implemented the transition plan in conjunction with the Senior Knowledge Management Specialist that seamlessly transitioned both platforms as well as the social media channels from YPL to YP2LE. This transition included writing a news post, adjusting project descriptions throughout the website, changing the logos (rebranding), and updating the About sections on our social media platforms. The YouthPower.org rebrand consisted of an update of the About page, creation of project pages for YP2LE and YP2, Annual Program Statement, and a restructured navigation for the Projects menu to accommodate the YouthPower2 project pages. Several of the navigation items that were specific to YouthPower Learning or YouthPower1 implementation projects, were taken off the navigation but remain on the website. ✔ New Country and Initiatives Pages on YouthLead.org Created and Managed. Seven new country pages and two special initiatives pages were developed on YouthLead.org during FY20. The pages included Generation Unlimited, Youth-led Acts of Good, and country pages for: Cambodia, Colombia, Democratic Republic of Congo, Guatemala, Kenya, and República Dominicana. In collaboration with the Community, Family, and Youth Resilience Program (CFYR) project in the YouthPower2: Learning and Evaluation Annual Report 19 Caribbean, YP2LE participated in a webinar to promote YouthLead. These existing country pages added over 7,299 pageviews in FY20. ✔ Starter Kits pages created to provide young changemakers with easy access to key resources on topics of their interest. Example: Youthlead Cambodia page Example: Starter Kit page for Connecting Youth to Agriculture ✔ Traffic on YouthPower.org and YouthLead.org Increased. YouthLead.org had 802,195 pageviews from 157,364 unique users in FY20. Users from USA, Nigeria, Kenya, Myanmar, Nepal, India, and South Africa are the countries with the highest number of users. During FY20, 365,031 pages were viewed on YouthPower.org by 124,526 unique users, and the United States, Nigeria, Kenya, India, UK, Philippines, and South Africa accounted for the majority of the users. ✔ YouthLead.org and YouthPower.org Discussion Groups were Created and Maintained. The YP2LE team monitored 1662 discussion postings on YouthLead.org. The discussion groups are used to promote new YP2LE products or campaigns, engage youth in discussions during specific international days (e.g., International Youth Day) as well as enable peer-to-peer discussions among youth on topics of their interest. On YouthPower.org, this functionality was only recently enabled, and 57 postings have been monitored to date. The discussion group functionality on YouthPower.org will support the new CoPs; three new discussion groups have been created: Gender, Youth Engagement, and Business/Entrepreneurship and Private-Sector Engagement. ✔ Arabic- and French-Speaking YouthLead Sites Developed. After completing the technology enhancement on the YouthLead.org site for the navigation in French and Arabic, YP2LE hired YouthPower2: Learning and Evaluation Annual Report 20 content management consultants to post new content in Arabic and French, as well as maintain the Spanish-language site. The French and Arabic site are being tested, and once sufficient content has been posted, the sites will be launched in FY21. YouthLead Arabic Site YouthLead French Site ✔ Website Management Strengthened. Completed and submitted the required forms for YouthPower.org and YouthLead.org for the Privacy Impact Assessment and 508-compliance to the COR for USAID CIO approval. Several functionality changes on the platforms were implemented to reflect comments from CIO’s office staff (e.g., strengthening 508-compliance and slightly changing the collection of certain personally identifiable information (PII)). ✔ Continued YouthLead Sponsor Engagement. Continued to engage sponsors in YouthLead campaign activities: Stop-the-Spread and YouthLead Acts of Good campaigns. Sponsors leveraged the social media messages and broadened the reach of the campaigns through their own social media and newsletters. Sponsors also amplified the calls for new YouthLead Ambassadors and the YAG group. Several sponsors provided speakers and facilitators for the International Youth Day webinar. We have held discussions with potential new sponsors and are close to confirming agreements with two new sponsors. YouthPower2: Learning and Evaluation Annual Report 21 Youth-led Acts of Good Campaign graphic Youth Engagement in Task 3 In FY20, the YouthLead Youth Engagement team advanced the priority activities in the following ways: ✔ On-boarded Atlas Corps Fellow. To fully integrate a youth voice onto our YP2LE team, a Youth Atlas Corps Fellow was recruited and onboarded to support youth engagement activities under YP2LE as the Youth Engagement Fellow (YE Fellow). The new Fellow began in May 2020, supervised by the Senior Youth Engagement (YE) Advisor. The Senior YE Advisor also took over management of one of our existing YE Fellows, who worked on youth engagement activities until August 2020. The YE Fellows provide direct support to cross-cutting youth engagement activities with a particular focus on YouthLead. He also leads the YouthLead Ambassador program for Cohorts 3 and 4 in FY21, advises on capacity strengthening and communications activities as needed, and regularly communicates with YAG members, YouthLead Ambassadors, and Peer Advisors for outreach, consultations, and assistance with survey and resource dissemination to the YouthLead Network. In FY20, the YE Fellow helped support the graduation of the second cohort of 19 YouthLead Ambassadors and first cohort of seven Peer Advisors in July 2020 and has led the recruitment and selection process for YLA Cohort 3, launched in October 2020 (anticipated to be completed November 2020). In addition, the YE Fellow provided input on the development of a concept for capacity strengthening activities in FY21. “I hope to get skills such as communication, leadership and build more connections which will help me to increase the impact in my community.” — Male, aged 18-24 YouthPower2: Learning and Evaluation Annual Report 22 ✔ Plan for New Capacity Building Trainings for Youth Lead Members Developed. In September 2020, the Senior YE Advisor drafted a concept and timeline for at least four capacity building trainings in FY21. The purpose is to provide youth in the YouthLead network with hands-on sessions designed to deepen and build their skills in ways that can support their work as young changemakers. Capacity building trainings will run parallel to the campaigns led by YouthLead Ambassador cohorts during their six-month fellowships, and in addition to other knowledge sharing and informational events and webinars on YouthLead. Capacity Building trainings will offer YP2LE youth engagement partners and YouthLead sponsors a clear path for youth engagement with YouthLead members, bringing their expertise to young people in the network. The plan to incorporate new Capacity Building trainings was reviewed by the YE Fellow, YAG member Capacity Building Lead, and youth engagement partner Bojan Boskovic, who agreed on the overall approach and next steps. The plan includes a network-wide survey in early FY21 to identify priority topics for building skills (e.g., project management, communication, digital platforms, advocacy) among young people, and a call for proposals from YP2LE partners and YouthLead sponsors to lead capacity building sessions on these topics. ✔ PSE Concept Note for YP2LE Developed. The team developed a concept note for engaging multi-national, private-sector companies in PYD early in FY20. Based on further discussions with USAID, it was determined that more internal (USAID) discussion was needed to ensure alignment and coordination on next steps. Due to USAID missions being focused on COVID-response planning, USAID suggested we would put the concept on hold until USAID/W was able to better engage missions on this. Based on this feedback and coordination in support of PSE, a draft SOW for a Partnerships Advisor that will address PSE across the full YP2LE project was submitted at the beginning of Year 2 and at the time of this report, is currently under review. The main objectives of the SOW include the development of a 10-12 page strategy that includes: 1) the identification of one to two priority private-sector partners for collaboration in support of USAID’s PYD Learning Agenda or other research activities; and 2) recommendations for USAID Missions on how to integrate youth issues and priorities into their Private-Sector Engagement Action Plans. ✔ YAG Developed and Engaged. The Senior YE Advisor worked with the YE Fellow and its youth engagement partner, Restless Development, to develop an annually rotating, seven-member YAG to help advise on meaningful youth engagement and leadership across all YP2LE tasks. YAG members meet bi-monthly in all-YAG meetings and have one-to-one check-in calls with the Senior YE Advisor to track progress and provide support, structure, and guidance on their specific roles in research, communications, advocacy, collaboration with the LN, capacity strengthening of youth organizations, and the development of a YouthLead mentoring program. YAG members are asked to provide ‘end user’ feedback on learning products, technical reports, and webinar topics. Two seats on the YAG are dedicated to graduates of the YouthLead Ambassador program. ● In FY20, terms of reference were developed to define the roles of the YAG and to inform the recruitment of the YAG members. Recruitment was initiated in April 2020. YP2LE launched, identified, recruited, and completed the onboarding process for seven YAG members, selected from among 1,300 candidates. The seven-member YAG includes young changemakers from Bolivia, Kenya, Lesotho, Mauritius, Nepal, the West Bank, and Uganda. (See Annex 3) A YAG Kick-Off Meeting was held in May 2020 to orient members to the project and their respective roles and points of contact under Tasks 1 – 4. The YAG also participated in a group co-creation process to agree on the purpose, goals, and modes of engagement as members of the YAG. One-to-one check-ins with individual YAG members to track progress were held in July 2020 and follow on one-to-one calls were held in September 2020 to discuss anticipated activities under their respective roles and Tasks for FY21. In FY20, YAG members were engaged across task in activities that included the PYD LAAG meetings and research products; the review of the YouthPower2: Learning and Evaluation Annual Report 23 YouthLead Ambassador program; the co-creation and development of the LN; a review of the mentorship youth survey; and the concept for FY21 capacity strengthening activities. The team regularly communicates with YAG members between scheduled calls and meetings via WhatsApp to address questions and engage members in additional opportunities, including special YouthLead events (e.g., the International Youth Day webinar, “Youth in the Lead: Engagement for Global Action,” in August 2020, where YAG members served in session facilitation roles). ● In FY20, the second cohort of 19 YLAs and first ever cohort of Peer Advisors (PAs)successfully graduated in July 2020. Over the course of their fellowship, YLAs co￾hosted nine learning events and campaigns, many of which addressed the impacts of the COVID￾19 pandemic on their work and communities. YLAs and PAs helped to support our global campaign in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Youth-Led Acts of Good. Before the completion of their program, YLAs and PAs also participated in a call with USAID (i.e., Nancy Taggart, Mike McCabe, and Hillary Taft) to help the agency understand how YLAs have been responding to the pandemic and to gather feedback on how we can better connect and grow the YouthLead network to other global youth networks. ● In August and September 2020, our team planned the next cycle for the third cohort of YLAs and PAs. This planning included an after-action review with our team, and a youth consultation with past and recently graduated YLAs and PAs as well as two YAG members who serve as YLA Liaisons. Young changemakers were invited to share their experiences and make recommendations for how we can continue to grow and strengthen the program, which were incorporated into the FY21 workplan and Cohort 3 Call for Applications that was launched in September 2020. In round one, our team received 3,124 applications for 22 YLA openings. The Senior YE Advisor and YE Fellow screened applications based on completion and candidate qualifications, narrowing the pool of applications to 2,200. We also recruited reviewers from among our team, former YLAs and PAs, and our youth engagement partners and YouthLead sponsors. In round two, the top 200 candidates were selected and prepared for round three, which will narrow the finalists to the top 30 and include interviews with our team and assigned YAG members in November 2020. ✔ Mentorship Initiative on YouthLead.org Initiated. The mentorship activity for YouthLead.org will enhance the support provided to its 10,000 young changemakers by offering access to a vetted mentor network, as well as resources, tools, webinars, trainings, and other events that focus on mentorship as a way to enhance leadership skills. YP2LE will take a youth-centered approach to the activity by connecting directly with young changemakers to understand demand for resources and information about mentorship and coaching. YouthLead sponsors and YP2LE’s youth engagement partners will support mentorship activities by participating in mentoring, providing tools and resources, and hosting trainings and events. Finally, YP2LE will reach out to private-sector partners that support youth development activities to discuss opportunities for employer engagement and mentorship through the YouthLead mentor network. ● In FY20, the Senior YE Advisor developed and finalized a mentorship concept and SOW in collaboration with youth engagement partner Restless Development and YAG member, Edna Tukiko. The concept outlined an approach to gathering youth input through a mentorship survey designed by Restless Development, as well as outreach to YouthLead sponsors and YP2LE youth engagement partners to understand their current activities related to mentorship. The concept also identified mentorship objectives and deliverables that include: 1) a network of vetted mentors for the YouthLead.org platform who can provide career support and assistance; 2) a page on the platform that provides searchable material (e.g., resources, tools, and other information) on recruiting and cultivating mentors, engaging with mentors, and developing YouthPower2: Learning and Evaluation Annual Report 24 mentorship programs in your community; and 3) a schedule of trainings and events on mentorship-related topics hosted by YouthLead sponsors, YP2LE youth engagement partners, and potential private-sector partners. Communications in Task 3: The Communication team collaborated with the Task Leads on the achievements listed above. Other achievements during the year include: ✔ YP2LE and YouthLead Webinars, Meetings, and Events Supported. The communications team designed invitations, webpages, and collected RSVPs held during FY20. The team also provided technical support in the facilitation of the events. ✔ Youth-led Acts of Good Campaign Communications Strategy Designed and Supported. The Communications team developed a communications strategy that pivoted the YouthLead COVID-19 #StoptheSpread campaign, which launched on Global Youth Service Days, April 17-19, 2020, to the Youth-led Acts of Good campaign, which ended on July 15, 2020. The campaign targeted young changemakers and highlighted youth-led service efforts, particularly those linked to the COVID-19 pandemic. The communications strategy included creating a more engaging campaign page, creating “a look” for the campaign, social media graphics and posts that promoted the campaign, creating a social media frame for those who made pledges to include on their social media profile, gathering stories about the pledgers, sharing the plan with partners to encourage cooperation, and maintaining an active social media presence surrounding the campaign by retweeting and reposting content from our followers. The Youth-led Acts of Good call to action and pledge summaries generated nearly 2,000 pageviews. Using the social media hashtags #YLActsofGood and #YouthLedActsofGood, additional combined outcomes included a social media reach of 176,976; 4,210 interactions; 2,959 likes, and 1,130 shares. Youth-led Acts of Good Social Media Campaign Graphic Task 4: As outlined in the RFQ, under Task 4 YP2LE will provide rapid response technical support to USAID Missions and Washington-based operating units (OUs) for the design, implementation, and evaluation of cross-sectoral PYD programs/activities/strategies, as needed, through field support buy-ins. In Year 1, YP2LE made progress toward the achievement of this objective and of the Expected Results as outlined, and in achievement of the goals and objectives in the approved Year 1 YP2LE workplan. YouthPower2: Learning and Evaluation Annual Report 25 ● Expected Result 1: Increased number of USAID-funded activities and policies designed based on PYD approach and evidence. ● Expected Result 2: USAID staff and partners have increased knowledge of country- and sector￾specific youth systems. ● Expected Result 3: USAID staff and partners have increased capacity to design, manage, and evaluate PYD programs based on evidence and best practices. ● Expected Result 4: Increased inclusion of youth, youth-led organizations (YLOs), and youth￾serving organizations (YSOs) in the design, implementation, and evaluation of PYD activities and policies throughout the program cycle. Accomplishments: After receiving approval for our Rapid Response Technical Support Plan as part of our Year 1 workplan we focused on key research and implementation activities under Task 4 as noted below. Buy-in Process Managed ✔ YP2LE Buy-In Webinar for Missions and OUs Held. Our team invited Missions and OUs to learn about the YP2LE buy-in process via Adobe Connect in February 2020. The webinar was recorded, and a link was shared with the full invite list provided by USAID. ✔ YP2LE Buy-In Factsheet Developed. The YP2LE team created a short buy-in factsheet to share with Missions and OUs so they have a quick reference on our purpose, capabilities, and the process for engaging YP2LE for Rapid Response Technical Support. ✔ Protocol for Guiding and Managing the Buy-In Process Developed. The YP2LE team created a process for managing buy-ins to ensure high-quality results, including the: ● development and finalization of buy-in activity SOWs and methodologies in partnership with USAID that align with a PYD framework, best practices, and lessons learned; ● drafting and finalizing of buy-in budgets and budget narratives for approval; ● instituting an expression of interest process for engagement of YP2LE partners on buy-ins based on relevant expertise, experience, networks, and capacity to mobilize teams quickly; ● forming buy-in teams, including assignment of internal staff and identification of Team Leads, Deputy Team Leads, and other subject matter experts and in-country support, operational and technical oversight, project management, research management, and PYD-aligned capacity￾strengthening, as needed; ● scheduling kick-off and closeout meetings; ● scheduling meetings around key milestones and deliverables with USAID, including workplan and report development; and ● developing PYD-aligned accessible activity deliverables for diverse multidisciplinary audiences with actionable strategic priorities, lessons learned, and recommendations. ✔ Layout Design for Buy-in Deliverables Created. Created a YP2LE branded and 508-compliant layout design for buy-in deliverables to promote efficiency and to ensure consistency and quality on deliverables submitted. YouthPower2: Learning and Evaluation Annual Report 26 ✔ Guidance Documents Developed. To provide additional support to assessment team members, YP2LE developed guidance documents to streamline remote completion of buy-in activities, including drafting of deliverables and data collection. ● Consolidated a Folder of Project Personnel Guidance Documents from Past Assessments. This folder includes manuals on branding and marking, editing, and style requirements; examples of workplans, strategic priorities, literature reviews, assessment reports, and briefs; consent, survey, interview, and focus group protocols; PowerPoint Templates; and the YP2LE factsheets. ● Developed a “How to and Security” Manual for Zoom. The manual addresses best practices for scheduling and facilitating meetings, recording, and transcribing discussions for qualitative data collection purposes, collecting quantitative data via polls, using breakout rooms, de-identifying research data from Zoom, and managing data storage and security. ● Developed a “How to and Security” Manual for Survey Monkey. The manual addresses best practices for managing users, permissions, creating, previewing, sending out, scoring, and closing surveys, as well as downloading, storing, and protecting survey participant data. ✔ Requests for Rapid Response Technical Support Engaged with the YouthLead Network. In August 2020 the Senior YE Advisor and the YE Fellow supported youth engagement in the Center on Children in Adversity (CECA) buy-in, with the dissemination of a survey on youth care levers. ✔ Rapid Response Technical Support Requests Addressed. Below is an update on the status of each request. 1. Guinea Youth Assessment ● The buy-in was split under YouthPower Learning and transitioned to YP2LE in April 2020. ● Research activities and the USAID outbrief were completed May 2020. The Situational Analysis and Youth Strategic Priorities Report were approved in September of 2020. The Summary Brief was submitted in September 2020 and is pending approval. 2. Mauritania Youth Assessment ● The buy-in was split under YouthPower Learning and transitioned to YP2LE in April 2020. ● Research activities and the USAID outbrief were completed April 2020. The Program Description and Assessment report deliverables were approved in August of 2020 and the Summary Brief was approved in September 2020. All deliverables have been publicly posted. 3. Madagascar Youth Assessment ● In-country research activities were completed in February 2020. ● The final version of the Assessment Report was reviewed, approved, and shared publicly in May 2020 and the Summary Brief was approved and disseminated in July of 2020. 4. W-GDP DREAMS Collaboration (GenDev/OHA/DREAMS) ● Activity consultants were approved and engaged in buy-in activities in April 2020. The Phase One workplan was approved June 2020. The final Literature Review Report was submitted to USAID in September 2020 and is under final review. ● The phase two workplan for virtual assessment activities is currently being drafted, pending USAID approval of workplan focus. YouthPower2: Learning and Evaluation Annual Report 27 ● Upon request of the USAID/Mozambique Mission, youth engagement training modules created under YouthPower Action will be translated into Mozambican Portuguese and adapted for a Mozambique context. Price estimates for translation and adaptation are currently under review by USAID. 5. Eastern and Southern Caribbean (ESC) Youth Assessment ● Desk review activities were completed and presented to USAID May 2020 and data collection activities completed June 2020. The Strategic Priorities and Situational Analysis Reports were approved, and the Strategic Priorities Report posted, in September 2020. The Summary Brief was submitted in September 2020 and is pending approval. 6. Dominican Republic Youth Assessment ● The key informant interviews were completed, and the Desk Review was approved in September 2020. 7. Youth in Agri-food Systems Learning Activity (Resilience and Food Security) ● Component 1 activities in final stages of completion. Inventory database was approved in September 2020. The Inventory Report, Metrics Report, Reference Group Terms of Reference, and proposed Reference Group Members are under review by USAID. ● The budget and SOW for Component 2 was approved in October 2020. 8. Protecting Children and Youth within USAID Education Programming (Africa Bureau) ● Data collection activities were completed and the survey and KII data analyses are underway. Development of the Design Document and Training Assets e-Learning Modules are in progress. ● The Training Needs Assessment presentation was held in September 2020. 9. Ghana Youth Assessment ● The budget and SOW were approved in October 2020 and the assessment team members are being finalized. 10. Morocco Youth Assessment ● The data collection activities were completed and outbrief presentation was held in September of 2020. An updated Assessment Report was sent for final approval in October 2020. 11. GenDev – Unleashing the Economic Leadership Power of Young Women: Strengthening the Evidence Base (“GenDev 2”) ● The Literature Review and KIIs for the Discovery Phase Report were completed in August 2020 and the report was submitted to USAID in September 2020. The updated report and Phase 2 SOW were submitted for review in October 2020. 12. Nicaragua Focused Youth Assessment ● The SOW and budget approval were received in October 2020. The recruitment of team members for assessment activities is ongoing. ● A meeting with Mission and USAID implementing partners on the current operating environment was attended in October 2020. 13. Integrating Youth and Mental Health and Psychosocial Support (MHPSS) Programming Toolkit (Mental Health) YouthPower2: Learning and Evaluation Annual Report 28 ● The budget and SOW were approved in July 2020. ● The activity start is confirmed with Mental Health team for mid-November 2020. The Team Lead was submitted for USAID concurrence in October 2020. 14. Center on Children in Adversity (CECA) ● Discussions were held on SOW and budget between July 2020 and October 2020. A revised budget and SOW were submitted in October 2020 and are under USAID’s review. ✔ Draft for a Youth Assessments 101 Brief Developed. The YP2LE team collected input via phone interviews and written feedback from the Missions in Armenia and Somalia, four previous YouthPower Learning assessment Team Leads, and the YouthPower Learning and YouthPower Action Project Directors for the brief. The data analysis and brief development were completed, and the brief was submitted and approved in September 2020. The brief is currently in the final design and layout stage and will be available in early December 2020. Communications in Task 4: The Communications Team worked closely with the Rapid Response Technical Support Team to provide support in the editing, design, layout, and 508-compliance for the Buy-in Deliverables. In addition, the team created resources pages, microsites, and URLs for each of the publicly facing deliverables as they were approved. III. Problems Encountered and Identified Solutions Key problems identified in this report reflect issues also identified in our prior report and will continue due to the geographic spread of our Rapid Response Technical Support teams and the ongoing COVID￾19 situation. They include the following: Time Management Scheduling Meetings with Partners and Buy-in Teams 1. Problem: Engagement of YP2LE partners across time zones. Solution: Identifying meeting times that accommodate the schedules of all partners has been a continuing challenge since there are partners in Australia and Uganda involved in the LAAG. YP2LE took several steps to ensure engagement from all partners, particularly in cases where meetings do not allow specific groups to attend in person. We developed and shared materials ahead of meetings and provided partners an opportunity to contribute thoughts and ideas prior to the actual meeting. Following meetings, notes for review and input are distributed to make sure that final meeting notes reflect the contributions of all relevant YP2LE partners. Additionally, we scheduled a separate follow-up meeting to collect in-person information from any partner who is unable to attend a meeting. Given the breadth of time zones, it is unlikely that we will be able to include all partners in every meeting. We will continue to prioritize engaging all partners in Task 1 activities by rotating meeting times, providing materials prior to meetings, and following up with notes and small group discussions after meetings. All partners have engaged remotely in meetings since mid-March 2020 due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and related travel and safety restrictions. We will continue to adhere to local and national guidance to ensure the safety of our partners and collaborating youth development researchers, practitioners, and other stakeholders. YouthPower2: Learning and Evaluation Annual Report 29 Scheduling Meetings and Technology Support 1. Problem: We found it hard to get field-based project teams to participate in the January 2020 collaboration team meeting. Solution: We conducted individual follow-up calls with field-based projects and decided they will be presenting on their program/accomplishments during a regular webinar series. 2. Problem: Due to buy-in team members being headquartered in multiple time zones, several with ongoing internet connectivity issues, finding a time and appropriate technology options for connecting all team members was a challenge. Solution: To ensure inclusion and participation of all team members, several technology platforms were often used simultaneously (e.g., calling into a conference call line through Skype while adding others into the meeting through individual or group calls on WhatsApp). The COVID-19 Pandemic 1. Problem: Because of the continuously changing COVID-19 situation, at the beginning of the reporting period, two buy-in activities (Guinea and Mauritania) had to discontinue in-person in￾country activities; especially activities that involved research with youth participants and youth development stakeholders. Solution: Team members worked together to revise activity workplans and research activities, which were rescheduled and completed virtually over the reporting period using remote technology platforms. This strategy safeguarded and prioritized participants’ health and safety and ensured the acquisition of crucial research data and input from participants. 2. Problem: Due to COVID-19 travel restrictions that went into effect in March 2020, we are unable to plan international travel for buy-in activities. Solution: As determined by the needs of the Missions/Operating Units and USAID Washington, we have developed different approaches to completing assessment activities that include virtual and local data collection and/or a two-phased approach. In the two-phased approach, the first phase focuses on activities that can be completed remotely (e.g., desk review and virtual key informant interviews), and the second phase includes possible field work at a future date as international travel is deemed permissible. 3. Problem: Due to COVID-19 restrictions, we were not able to organize the quarterly Collaboration Group meetings. Solution: We replaced the in-person meetings with webinars held in July and September 2020, which also made it easier for field project staff to participate. Lessons Learned Throughout the year, our team garnered a series of lessons learned, which are highlighted in the next section. Meetings and Stakeholder Engagement We learned several lessons throughout the year that helped us improve how to manage and steer our partner meetings. These learnings include: ● Ensure Sufficient Time for Partners to Have Meaningful Discussions. For the first and second LAAG meetings held in March and July 2020, we shared with LAAG members the background documents on research priorities and research activity updates ahead of time. The YouthPower2: Learning and Evaluation Annual Report 30 sharing of documents allowed us to have a deeper discussion during the meeting and gather their insights and recommendations for key research priorities, ongoing research activities, and inputs on the Year 2 workplan. ● Team Different Organizations with Each Other During Small Group Activities. For the LAAG meeting, we worked to ensure that small groups included people from various organizations and perspectives. This strategy resulted in greater participation and engagement, richer discussion, and clearer conclusions. ● Ensure that Small Group Discussions Have a Clear Facilitator Assigned Ahead of Time. Combined in-person and virtual meetings work well when you break attendees up into small discussion groups that include a facilitator. During our LAAG meetings, participants were assigned to small groups of attendees. This step resulted in more active engagement throughout the meeting. ● Promotion of Collaboration and Agreement on Priorities is Essential. Research and donor organizations have different foci and priorities. It takes time to work together and agree on priorities. USAID and the donor community need research to drive evidence-based decision￾making and program design. Research organizations often conduct research to fill gaps in knowledge and contribute to the broader theoretical literature of international development. ● Research moved slower than anticipated. We have learned that it can take time to bring stakeholders together and identify research priorities that meet the immediate needs of the donor community while also contributing to research writ large. ● Agreeing on the scope of activities took longer than anticipated Working closely with YP2LE partner organizations to manage timelines, LOE, and expectations for completing research activities, while ensuring completion of agreed-upon SOW and quality assurance and utility of final deliverables took longer than anticipated. We will be building in more time to have these discussions during our LAAG meetings to help accelerate work for the coming year. We will continue to value the partnership brings to increasing our knowledge base around what works in youth development. ● Short, Graphically Driven, and Easily Digestible Products are a Must. USAID needs products that can be easily used in a quick manner, rather than longer research reports. We have shifted our focus in Year 2 to create these shorter, easier to use products to meet USAID needs. ● Need to Identify New Youth Programs to Implement Impact Evaluations. There are new USAID-funded youth activities in procurement but there are only a few which are ready for designing an evaluation; this timing disconnect has made it difficult to organize an impact evaluation as desired. We will continue to work with USAID to identify a program to implement an impact evaluation that can be successfully accomplished with the YP2LE three-year timeline, and potential two additional option years. Technology/Data Collection ● Virtual Technology Platforms Can Be Used Separately or Simultaneously When In￾Person Data Collection Cannot Be Completed. The team used this strategy as a mechanism to carry out data collection activities and promote collection of data and key recommendations. YouthPower2: Learning and Evaluation Annual Report 31 ● Local Experts Can Be Engaged to Conduct Assessment Activities In-Country When International Travel Cannot Be Completed Safely. As permissible, the team partnered with an international expert to provide direction and guidance virtually. ● Conducting Internal Training on Collection of Monitoring Data for Non-Research Staff Can Build Capacity for Data Tracking and Reporting Processes. Developing and finalizing the YP2LE monitoring and evaluation tracking tool was more challenging than anticipated. We learned that several of the YP2LE activities were not collecting the indicator data in the needed disaggregation for reporting. To streamline our monitoring processes, we met with each task lead to understand how the data were previously collected and identify ways that we could change data collection processes to enable us to obtain data in the disaggregated forms requested by our ITT. We also held an indicator training workshop (highlighted above) to build the team’s understanding of indicators, data, and data collection. YouthLead Campaigns ● Large Social Media Campaigns Require Time to Plan. We did not have the luxury of that time for the #StoptheSpread Campaign and pivoted halfway through with the Youth-led Acts of Good Campaign. To launch a successful, social media campaign, 3-4 weeks of planning and set-up are required to develop a campaign plan, a message that resonates with the audience, and realistic call to action. ● Involving Champions/Influencers is Key to Campaign Success. If the call to action comes only from the organization, it is less likely to have a significant impact. Having YouthLead Ambassadors be part of the planning and implementation of the campaign helped to energize the campaign. Asking the Ambassadors to develop content before the launch, allowed us to give the campaign some immediate momentum. ● There Must be Incentive for Followers to Participate. For the campaign to get traction, young people need to understand what is in it for them to participate. Usually it will be visibility and increased likes and followers, but occasionally it will need to be something more significant. A key planning theme for future campaigns will be what will be the draw to get followers to participate (e.g., offering awards, mentoring services from partners, opportunities to present, etc.) The COVID-19 Pandemic ● Flexibility is Key to Responding to Crisis. We pivoted rapidly from in-person data collection during buy-in assessments to the use of remote tools (such as phone and Skype calls) that helped us to continue to facilitate research activities and promote acquisition of rich data and insights. Similarly, we have matched local in-country personnel with remote international advisors to be able to continue buy-in activities. ● Recognizing that Strategies Vary in Mitigating COVID-19 Globally. When preparing the workplan for 2021 (including regional or global meetings), YP2LE will need to take into account the fact that different countries will be at different stages of the COVID-19 pandemic and may not allow in-person activities. ● Assessments Can Be Completed in Two Phases. In order to respond to Missions’ needs in a comprehensive and timely fashion, the two-phased approach allows for accommodations for international travel and in-country data collection to occur at a later time, as deemed safe and permissible, to supplement the first phase of activities. YouthPower2: Learning and Evaluation Annual Report 32 Buy-in Management ● Having the Staff to Meet the Demand is Critical. To maintain effectiveness and quality with the large number of complex buy-in activities, YP2LE brought on a new Project Director, added a Senior Technical Advisor to the buy-ins and brought on two new Project Managers/Project Officers to help manage buy-ins and subcontractors. Additionally, to support the high level of buy-ins and expansive Task 1-3 activities, YP2LE is adding two new staff in Year 2 to support the work and to maintain high-quality deliverables. The two staff being added are a Youth Development Specialist and a Knowledge Management and Online Communities Manager. ● Agreeing on SOW and Budget takes longer than anticipated. As outlined above with Task 1 research and products, YP2LE will build in additional time to reflect challenges faced in Year 1 to negotiate the final SOW, budget, staffing, and subsequent deliverables with Operating Units and Missions. V. Indicator Measurement The YP2LE indicator tracking table is below and includes year-to-date information. Indicator Target # Baseline # FY to Date # Number of research and learning products developed by the YP2LE contract. 3 0 1 Number of knowledge products and tools disseminated through the YouthPower and YouthLead platforms produced by the YP2LE contract and other awards under the YP2 umbrella. 11 0 55 Number of Learning Network members. 5,000 4,719 6,557 Number of Learning Network members who participated in events, discussions, trainings, and forums. 350 0 1,093 A count of the number of knowledge products and tools developed by YP2LE or YP2 partners that are posted on the YouthPower and YouthLead websites. N/A 0 11 Number of website views. 100,000 0 681,675 Number of USAID staff and YP IPs who designed, implemented, adapted, or measured an activity/CDCS/PAD using evidence and tools from the PYD trainings and/or the PYD Learning Network, and/or the YouthPower and YouthLead websites. 15 0 11 Number of Learning Network Members who designed, implemented, adapted, or measured an activity/CDCS/PAD using evidence and tools from the PYD trainings, the PYD Learning Network, and/or the YouthPower and YouthLead websites. 30 0 Annual survey YouthPower2: Learning and Evaluation Annual Report 33 Number of youth engaged in YP2LE activities. 40 0 1,113 Number of studies, tools, or products developed that relate to learning agenda gaps. 1 0 2 Member satisfaction with the overall PYD Learning Network. 85% satisfied 0 86% satisfied Member satisfaction with the YouthPower and YouthLead websites. 85% satisfied 0 75% satisfied Number of events organized or co-hosted by the YP2LE contract. 15 0 56 Number of YP2LE-sponsored webinars. 6 0 21 Number of events attended by YP2LE subcontractors to disseminate project information. 20 0 12 Number of buy-ins completed by YP2LE staff 5 0 3 Number of eNewsletter subscribers. 5,000 4,719 38,502 Number of new web pages developed or updated.1 6 0 25 Number of social media posts. 300 0 906 Number of youth programs that include PYD concepts and features that are influenced by YP2LE activities. 10 0 Annual survey Amount of web content reviewed, approved and published on YouthPower.org and YouthLead.org 1,900 0 2,645 Events Organized or Co-Hosted by YP2LE2 Name Count YouthPower2: Learning and Evaluation Virtual Kick-off Meeting, 2020 1 YLA All Member Webinars 2 Peer Advisor (PA) Webinar 2 YLA and PA Graduation Ceremony 1 YouthLead Kenya Meetup 1 Youth in the Lead: Engagement for Global Action: (International Youth Day Webinar) 1 1 This indicator refers to the number of “What Works” and country web pages only. The final content for the two “What Works” pages included in this total were submitted for USAID review in September and are pending approval. 2 Events reported under Year 1 of YP2LE include any events that occurred after awarding of the YP2LE contract in September 2019. This includes activities that were cited during this time period in the YouthPower Learning Final Report that were YP2LE-related. YouthPower2: Learning and Evaluation Annual Report 34 Name Count Youth Advisory Group Kick-Off Meeting 1 Youth Advisory Group One-to-One Check Ins 14 2020 YouthPower Annual Learning Network Meeting 1 YouthPower2: Learning and Evaluation Virtual Kick-off Meeting 1 Youth-Led Acts of Good Campaign 1 Fighting the Unseen Impacts of COVID-19 Webinar 1 How Youth Leverage Tech to Advocate for SRHR and Gender Equality Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic Webinar 1 What Can Cooperatives Do for Youth? YouthLead Webinar 1 Supporting Children’s Mental Health and Well-Being in Conflict and Crisis, A Case Study of No Limit Gen Webinar 1 Leveraging Social Media to Advocate for Transparency and Accountability Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic Webinar 1 Education and Voluntary Reproductive Health Care: A Panacea for Positive Youth and Community Development Webinar 1 Cost Measurement in USAID Youth Development Programs Webinar 1 Cost Measurement in USAID Youth Development Programs – Asia/Pacific Webinar 1 Youth Action in Fighting Misinformation: An Infodemic in a Pandemic Webinar 1 Youth Engagement during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case for Youth Leadership Webinar 1 What Youth Can Learn about the Environment Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic Webinar 1 Collaboration: Collaboration Group meeting – The Enabling Environment (YP2LE Collaboration Group Kick-off Meeting) 1 Collaboration: Webinar on Pivoting Youth Projects Due to COVID-19 1 Collaboration: Webinar on Successful Private-Sector Engagement 1 Collaboration: Check-ins with YPL implementation projects’ chiefs of party/field teams 6 YouthLead Webinar: How to Use Youth Voice to Advocate for Change 1 Webinar: YP2LE: An Introductory Meeting for USAID Missions and OUs 1 What Youth Can Learn about the Environment Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic 1 Las redes sociales como herramienta para mejorar la convivencia 1 Learning Network: Co-creation meetings 5 Webinar: How do I Join a CoP? (Learning Network Kick-off) 1 Total 56 YouthPower2: Learning and Evaluation Annual Report 35 Annex 1: Accomplishments All Funding Sources Task Activity BFS DRG PRH E3/ED 1 Advanced Research Priorities Identified by the YouthPower Community through LAAG and facilitation of two meetings with LAAG representatives. x x x x 1 Drafted scopes of work for a systematic review of what works in designing Systems and Scaling Positive Youth Development (PYD) programs, including a component focused on cost and cost-effectiveness, a systematic review of PYD impacts on Marginalized and Vulnerable Youth, and document review and development of a youth framework for cost and cost effectiveness. x x x x 1 Held a series of meetings to identify additional research on understanding cross-sectoral impacts of PYD on youth and their communities and on the effectiveness of youth engagement in PYD programming. x x x x 1 Drafted article for the Journal of Youth Development on learnings from YPL and YP2LE CSYAs: Learning from Youth Perspectives: Implications from 17 Cross-Sectoral Youth Assessments. x x x x 2 Task Order Collaboration Activities that include YP task order projects and USAID Missions/OUs, including quarterly meetings. x x x x 2 Completed Learning Network Listening Report x x x x 2 Designed and Delivered Learning Network Co-Creation Sessions. x x x x 2 Managed the creation of a new Learning Network (LN), including three CoPs: Youth Engagement, Gender, and Business, Entrepreneurship and PSE. x x x x 2 Completed the first Collaboration Group meeting under YP2LE and pivoted Collaboration Group activities to adjust to COVID-19 reality and travel constraints. (Focus on Enabling Environment) x x x x 2 Organized two Collaboration Group webinars (i.e., July 2020 and September 2020) to replace the quarterly in￾person meetings. (COVID-19 pivot; Private-Sector Engagement) x x x x 3 Designed and supported the Youth-led Acts of Good Campaign Communications Strategy. x x x x YouthPower2: Learning and Evaluation Annual Report 36 Task Activity BFS DRG PRH E3/ED 3 Recruited, identified, and on-boarded the Atlas Corps Fellow, YLAs, and PAs to support youth engagement activities. x x x x 3 Country pages maintained and developed. x x x x 3 Curated, tagged, and posted content on YouthLead and YouthPower.org. x x x x 3 New product pages/microsites created (i.e., Youth Center Toolkit). x x x x 3 Grew YouthLead membership to over 10,000 registered members. x x x x 3 Developed and completed a transition from YPL to YP2LE for YouthLead.org and YouthPower.org by mid-May. Updated navigation and search capability. x x x x 3 Contributed to questions for the annual survey led by the MEL team. x x x x 4 Prepared statements of work and budgets for buy-ins. x x x x 4 Managed the buy-in process. x x x x 4 Provided Rapid Response Technical Support and produced deliverables. x x x x Accomplishments Individual Funding Source Task Activity BFS DRG PRH E3/ED 1 Develop concept note on use of Youth Engagement Index dashboard. x 1 Developed Mission-guidance Document on WORQ tool. x 2 Completed a video in collaboration with the Puentes/Bridges team in El Salvador, to showcase successful private-sector engagement. x x x 3 Developed content for two new What Works pages for YouthPower.org on very young adolescents and first-time parents. x YouthPower2: Learning and Evaluation Annual Report 37 Annex 2. Results of the Satisfaction Survey This annex summarizes the results from the YP2LE Satisfaction Survey that was conducted with YP2LE Learning Network members and youth as part of the end of the year reporting process. The survey was implemented using the SurveyMonkey platform. The survey was distributed in three ways: 1. Sent via email to Learning Network members who are on the newsletter distribution list. 2. Placed on the YouthPower.org and YouthLead.org websites. 3. Distributed to our youth ambassadors with a request that they share the survey among their networks. The following sections provide the detailed findings from the survey. Demographics of Respondents Approximately 504 respondents consented to take the survey, of which 473-479 respondents provided demographic and organization/sector data. Of the 504 people who consented to take the survey, 320 respondents said they were familiar with the YouthPower or YouthPower2 Learning and Evaluation projects. The majority of respondents were ages 25 to 34 (58 percent) with a third (34 percent) of respondents in the age segment of 18 to 24 years of age (figure 1). The majority of respondents were also male (64 percent) while 36 percent were female. Figure 1 captures the demographics of the survey takers. When asked how participants identified vis a vis an organization, the majority of respondents identified their organization affiliation as a member of YouthLead (40 percent), student (16 percent) or Youth Entrepreneur (13 percent). Figure 2 shows the breakdown of organizational affiliation. Figure SEQ Figure \* ARABIC 1. Demographics of respondents YouthPower2: Learning and Evaluation Annual Report 38 Participants indicated that economic growth, trade, and entrepreneurship along with education and health were the primary sectors of interest among respondents. Democracy, human rights, and governance followed closely behind these primary sectors (Figure 3). Experience with YouthPower.org The purpose of this section of the survey was to gather information to support improvements related to the use and functionality of the YouthPower.org website. The questions focused on the ability of users to access and download information, the speed with which information could be accessed and downloaded and the look and feel of the website. We also asked participants about the ease with which they could locate the information they wanted to access and if there were any gaps of information. Figure 2. Organization affiliation of respondents Figure 3. Primary sector of interest of respondents YouthPower2: Learning and Evaluation Annual Report 39 Of the 504 people who consented to take the survey, 285 respondents said they were familiar with YouthPower.org website but only three respondents answered questions related to the use and utility of the website. We believe that the survey had problems with the skip logic, which caused many participants to accidentally skip to the section related to Learning Network member satisfaction. We are currently looking into the problems with this section of the survey and will resend the website user satisfaction survey to Learning Network members again later this year through the newsletter to see if we can gather additional data. For the three responses that we received in this round of the survey, respondents indicated that they visited the website one to two times or three to four times. The reasons to visit the website included learning about positive youth development, looking for new publications, and perusing content. The three respondents largely agreed with the provided statements about the functionality of the YouthPower.org website (figure 4). The one suggestion to improve the functionality of the website was to have bigger headers. When asked about the gaps that exist in terms of the resources provided, one respondent suggested to “make it easier to find the rigorous studies.” When asked about how frequently the content should be updated on the website, all three respondents said “monthly.” When it comes to use of resources, the three respondents listed the following resources as the most useful ones they have used from the website: ● PYD Systematic Review ● event posting ● research studies ● PYD framework Respondents also noted that they have used those resources to support report writing and research papers. Respondents were asked to rate the website on a scale of 1 (poor) to 4 (excellent). All three respondents rated it as 3 (above average). “The site has many useful resources and a wealth of information.” (Female aged, 35+) YouthPower2: Learning and Evaluation Annual Report 40 Experience with YouthLead.org Of the 504 people who consented to take the survey, 293 respondents said they were familiar with the YouthLead website but only 1 respondent answered questions from that section and provided website ratings. This respondent indicated that they had not visited the website in the last three months but said that when they had visited in the past, it was “to learn about youth-led projects.” The respondent agreed with all provided statements about the functionality of the YouthPower.org website, except for the one where asked about being able to share content from the website on social media (they answered “don’t know”) (Figure 5). The respondent also agreed that there are gaps in the current resources provided on the website but did not specify which ones. When asked about how frequently the content should be updated on the website, the respondent said “monthly.” When asked about what topics or issues they would be most interested in learning about on the website, the responded said Figure 4. Experience with the YouthPower.org website YouthPower2: Learning and Evaluation Annual Report 41 “workforce.” The one respondent rated the website as 3 (above average). No explanation was provided for the rating. Experience with the YouthPower Learning Network The third section of the YP2LE survey focused on the satisfaction level of the Learning Network members. The survey probed their experience within the network, the use and utility of the information that members receive from the newsletter, and their interactions within the network. This section summarizes the findings related to the Learning Network satisfaction. Of the 504 people who consented to take the survey, 290 respondents said they were engaged in the YouthPower Learning Network. Of that group, 123 to 249 respondents answered questions from that section. The variation in the number of respondents who answered each question is related to the fact that not all 249 respondents answered all of the questions in the section. Figure 6 shows the results that respondents selected related to the awareness, participation, and usefulness of the YP2LE Learning Network and YP2LE newsletters. The “N” for responses ranged from 239 to 249. Most of the respondents either strongly agreed or agreed with the statements. Respondents were asked how they use the information from the YouthPower2 and YouthLead newsletters. Respondents mentioned that they share the newsletters in their networks after reading it; they use the newsletter to expand their knowledge; they apply the knowledge to their daily activities, projects, discussion groups; for awareness on what is going on around the topics of interest and around the world; to check for new opportunities; to lead youth in their communities and to empower youth to make informed decisions; to get new skills and opportunities (Figure 7). A few respondents said they became aware of the newsletters through this survey. Table 1. Provides a summary of participants’ open-ended question responses. Figure 5. Experience with the YouthLead.org website YouthPower2: Learning and Evaluation Annual Report 42 Table 1. Open-ended participant responses “Given my work in capacity strengthening and business support that I offer to the youth and corporate institutions, the content from the newsletters especially the links to the various resources offer me extra information to better support the different sets of people that I work with.” (Male, aged 25-29) “In these times where there’s so much information everywhere, the information there is very well integrated and helps better understand and apply it in everyday life. And remain knowledgeable.” (Female, aged 18-24) “The information I get from the newsletter helps me to increase my knowledge and gain new things, which helps me to do a better job every day, as well as to continue to work with young people to continue our development and the country through innovation.” (Male, aged 25-29) “As an educator, sometimes you get stuck in trying to innovate lessons. The newsletter helps me create and envision new lessons from the ideas I read.” (Female, aged 25-29) Respondents were also asked what they most hoped to get out of the YP2LE Learning Network. The top responses included: ● increase their knowledge, ● further their experience, ● increase their skills, ● serve their communities, ● gain and share knowledge and ideas in their networks, ● strengthen work expertise and performance, ● networking and career opportunities, and ● exposure to various organizations and sharing best practices and challenges (Figure 8). Table 2. Expectations of the Learning Network. “I hope to network with other young minds across the globe to achieve a common goal.” (Male, aged 25-29) “It is biggest youth network for young people who are agents of change, and being part will provide a wider platform/higher grounds for connection, sharing knowledge, and a greater learning process as a leader in my communities.” (Male, aged 25-29) YouthPower2: Learning and Evaluation Annual Report 43 “My goal is to share knowledge and opportunities that will benefit my community. By acquiring and implementing more human development skills and project management monitoring skills, I will be able to put idealistic concepts into realistic practice.” (Female, aged 25-29) “I hope to get skills such as communication, leadership, and build more connections, which will help me to increase the impact in my community.” (Male, aged 18-24) Of the total number of survey respondents, 162 people said that they joined at least one of the Communities of Practice. When asked about the reason for joining a Community of Practice, the following reasons were included: ● to improve their skills and knowledge, ● to better serve their communities, ● as part of community work, ● to be of service and have an impact, ● to inspire youth to realize their potentials, ● found it beneficial, ● to widen their network, ● to gain more experience and provide support to those who need it, and ● to help in the work of being a youth leader. Fifty-five respondents said they did not join at least one of the CoP. When asked why, many said they were not aware, did not have access to it, or did not know where to find the communities. A few respondents noted technical issues. In the final section that asked respondents for additional comments, many expressed their gratitude for the YouthPower and Learning Network resources with a few suggestions for improving the overall learning network. The suggestions included things such as: ● to modify the format of the distribution emails, ● seek feedback, ● add YouTube tutorials regarding CoP, ● create ways on how youth with limited access to the internet can reach these resources, ● free online training in youth leadership and relationships, and ● to consider translating the website into other languages (such as French, for example). Several respondents noted that they wanted to become a member but didn’t know how or applied and have not heard back. Respondents also made suggestions for improving the network including ensuring that resources are available to participants in the network; modifying the format of emails; and increasing the number of topics discussed on a daily basis. The two quotes below capture these suggestions from members of the network. “I appreciate the resources available for us. My suggestion would be to modify the format in which the emails are sent. There are many amazing resources and pages available but sometimes, they can get lost or the description is not available within the title or content of the email in order to open the full content.” (Female, aged 25-29) YouthPower2: Learning and Evaluation Annual Report 44 “I like the project very much and I suggest that there should be increase of topic in each day and in weekend there should be at least two hours of hot discussion and in ending of at least quarter there should be a day to make evaluation of what every member has done.”(Male, aged 18-24) YouthPower2: Learning and Evaluation Annual Report 45 Annex 3: YP2LE Youth Advisory Group (YAG) Name and Role Biography Zwelithini Matsoso Learning Network Steering Committee Liaison Zwelithini Matsoso serves as the advisor to the United Nations Youth Advisory Panel hosted under United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) Lesotho country office, and the International Youth Alliance for Family Planning Country Coordinator for Lesotho. He also serves the Global Hope Mobilization as the Project Officer on COVID-19, and the Women Deliver Young Leader for Lesotho. He has worked with the Ministry of Gender, Youth, Sports and Recreation to build the Lesotho National Youth Policy and facilitate consultations of the National Youth Development Bill, and has further advocated for meaning engagement of Youth in the national reforms processes; constitution, judiciary, public service, security, media and economic reforms. He is the founder of the Lesotho-based human rights organization, Economic and Social Justice Project. Zwelithini has also coordinated over 57 Youth organizations to form the Youth Alliance on COVID-19 which mandate is to promote Youth engagement in COVID19 response and to bring relief to Youth affected by COVID-19. Edna Tukiko Mentorship Liaison Kenya Edna is an international development professional with multicultural experience in youth programs across Eastern and Southern Africa, and South Asia, including at UNICEF and at UNFPA. She holds over seven years of mentoring experience and is currently an advisory council member at the Global Give Back Circle—a program that empowers and connects at-risk adolescent girls with local and international mentors. Edna leveraged her expertise in mentorship program design and management as a consultant in the design and implementation of the mentorship program for the Young African Leadership Initiative (YALI) Regional Leadership Center East Africa. She helped design the strategy and recruited and trained mentors from the private and public sector to work with the first two cohorts of YALI participants. She is an alumnus of YALI East Africa (2016), a mentor at the MasterCard Foundation Scholars program, and at the Kakenya Centre of Excellence in Kenya. Edna is passionate about leadership, innovation, and in ensuring that youth fulfil their potential. Nandini Tanya Lallmon Advocacy and Communications Liaison Mauritius Nandini Tanya Lallmon is a lawyer by profession and humanitarian by passion. She is the legal lead of the #Reform53 campaign of the Commonwealth Youth, Gender, and Equality Network. She is also an advisor to the Steering for Greatness Foundation, Global Peace Chain, International Human Rights Advisory Council, Agents of Peace Kenya, and CIVICUS. YouthPower2: Learning and Evaluation Annual Report 46 Name and Role Biography Additionally, she is the founder of the Mauritius Chapters of the International Youth Council, International Youth Society, Youth Advocacy Council and African Network of Youth Policy Experts. Moreover, she is a fellow of the Young African Leaders Initiative, African Changemakers, African Women Entrepreneurship Cooperative and TEDx 100Ideas100Millennials. Besides, she volunteers as career coach for Opportunity Desk, ambassador for the My Body is My Body Program, community leader for internet health at Digital Grassroots, pro-bono consultant for The African Gusto Hub and business mentor for the Mentoring Women in Business Program of the Cherie Blair Foundation for Women. She has won multiple awards for her philanthropic work at local, regional, and international levels. In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, Nandini Tanya Lallmon endeavors to amplify the voices of marginalized groups through digital activism on social media. Firas Bali Capacity Building Liaison West Bank Firas Bali is a founding member of Ibtikar for empowerment and social entrepreneurship with a professional background in the field of social entrepreneurship and innovation. Previously, he has worked with international and local organizations in project management and monitoring and evaluation of Humanitarian and development projects. With over six years of experience working with nonprofits and social enterprises working to promote education and youth empowerment in Palestine, he feels passionate about social enterprise development and education innovation. Wendy Meruvia YouthLead Ambassador Liaison Bolivia Wendy Meruvia is a social entrepreneur who is passionate about youth, innovation, development and Experiential Learning. She is founder and director of Ciudad Mundo. A social enterprise that promotes the comprehensive development of youth through high-impact learning experiences, that involve international traveling and local training. She has a bachelor's degree in graphic design, a diploma in higher education, a master's degree in social project management, and another in business administration. She works every day to pursue the transformation of the younger generations. Kushal Naharki YouthLead Ambassador Liaison Nepal Kushal Naharki is a passionate environment activist and young changemaker from Nepal. He is highly dedicated towards empowering youth and communities through knowledge sharing, training, events, webinars, and campaigns in the field of Environment, Agriculture, and Youth Empowerment. He is the winner of Eco Hero Award 2018. He has worked as Regional Ambassador to Asia for EcoGeneration, Local Representative of YPARD Nepal, Project Member of Climateducate South Asia and YouthLead Ambassador. He believes that we are our own leader of positive changes and innovations in our community. YouthPower2: Learning and Evaluation Annual Report 47 Name and Role Biography He is interested in Entrepreneurship, Capacity Building, Climate Change, Plant Health and Agriculture Biotechnology. Hilda Namakula Youth Research Advisor Uganda Hilda is a passionate youth-led research, youth engagement, policy, and development practitioner with more than seven years of practical experience in conducting research, developing policy publications and supporting the implementation of public health and development projects in Uganda and South Africa. She currently works as a Co-Principle investigator on the ALERTs (Adherence, Lived Experiences and Resilient Transformation among “slum dwellers”) study focusing on documenting the impact of COVID-19 on slum dwellers to inform the national COVID 19 task force response and projects’ design. She has previously worked with Makerere University School of Public Health as a Research Fellow in the Kampala Slum Maternal & Newborn Project (MANE). Hilda’s experience in youth-led research and policy has included the Youth4Policy fellowship with Konrad Adenuer Stiftung (KAS) and Youth Think Tank (YTT) fellowship with the MasterCard Foundation. She’s also an alumna of the Young Africa Leaders Initiative (YALI), and a Co-Founder of Mwamba Imara Foundation—an initiative that supports young adults in livelihoods and health.