Development Partner Profile

United Nations Childrens Fund Download PDF

Summary

This development partner profile showcases different dimensions of performance and the distribution of development finance of the United Nations Childrens Fund. The information below was compiled from two sources: AidData's 2014 Reform Efforts Survey and 2004-2013 Core Database. The 2014 Reform Efforts Survey asked public, private, and civil society leaders in 126 low- and middle-income countries questions about the most pressing problems they face, their top policy priorities, and how aid agencies can partner with them most effectively. Leaders evaluated the degree to which the United Nations Childrens Fund's influenced the policy agenda (n=1041), provided useful advice (n=621), and how helpful this development partner was in implementation (n=361). The 2004-2013 Core Database represents the most comprehensive dataset tracking international development finance.

Where does the United Nations Childrens Fund's Development Finance go?

Top Partner Countries
(in millions USD by % of development finance)

  1. DRC (5%, 476.9)
  2. Nigeria (4%, 462.9)
  3. India (4%, 416.7)
  4. Ethiopia (4%, 393.5)
  5. Afghanistan (3%, 313.9)
  6. Pakistan (2%, 197.7)
  7. Uganda (2%, 194.8)
  8. Bangladesh (2%, 192.7)
  9. Tanzania (2%, 178.5)
  10. Niger (2%, 178.2)

Source: AidData's 2004-2013 Core Database

Distribution of the United Nations Childrens Fund's Development Finance, 2004-2013
(millions of USD)

Source: AidData's 2004-2013 Core Database

In which countries is the United Nations Childrens Fund performing the best?

0 = not at all influential
5 = extremely influential

1 = not at all useful
5 = extremely useful

* The usefulness of advice scale ranged from 1 to 5.

0 = not at all helpful
5 = extremely helpful

Source: AidData's 2014 Reform Efforts Survey, Q14, Q21, Q25

How do in-country stakeholders perceive the United Nations Childrens Fund's performance?

2.4

Survey respondents gave an average score of 2.4 to the United Nations Childrens Fund's agenda-setting influence, 0.4 above the average country.

3.6

Survey respondents gave a score of 3.6 to the United Nations Childrens Fund's usefulness of advice.

*The usefulness of advice scale ranged from 1 to 5.

3.4

Survey respondents gave a score of 3.4 to the United Nations Childrens Fund's helpfulness in policy reform implementation.

Source: AidData's 2014 Reform Efforts Survey, Q14, Q21, Q25

The United Nations Childrens Fund's Useful Advice, Amount of Development Finance, and Influence by Policy Area

Policy Domain

Economic policy


Social and environmental policy


Governance policy



Agenda-setting influence


0= no influence at all
5= maximum influence

Governance: land, decentralization, anti-corruption & transparency, democracy, public administration, justice & security, tax, customs, and public expenditure management
Economic: macroeconomic management, trade, business regulatory environment, investment, labor, energy & mining, infrastructure, and finance, credit & banking
Environment & Social: health, education, family & gender, social protection & welfare, environmental protection, and agriculture & rural development

** The amount of development finance is log-transformed to account for skewed distribution of aid across sectors.

Source: AidData's 2004-2013 Core Database and 2014 Reform Efforts Survey, Q14, Q21

Citation
Samantha Custer, Zachary Rice, Takaaki Masaki, Rebecca Latourell and Bradley Parks. 2015. Listening to Leaders: Which Development Partners Do They Prefer and Why? Williamsburg, VA: AidData. http://aiddata.org/listening-to-leaders.